Practice explains abolished behavioural adaptation after human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex lesions

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Van Steenbergen, H ^a   Haasnoot, E ^a   Bocanegra, B R ^a   Berretty, E W ^b   Hommel, B ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Outpatient Clinic for Anxiety Disorders PsyQ   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CINGULATE GYRUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927944466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09721     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Shackman, A. J. et al. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 154-167 (2011).
2. Fellows, L. K. & Farah, M. J. Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain 128, 788-796 (2005).
3. Di Pellegrino, G., Ciaramelli, E. & Ladavas, E. The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 275-286 (2007).
4. Maier, M. E. & di Pellegrino, G. Impaired conflict adaptation in an emotional task context following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesions in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 2070-2079 (2012).
5. Sheth, S. A. et al. Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation. Nature 488, 218-21 (2012).
6. Botvinick, M. M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402, 179-181 (1999).
7. Bush, G. & Shin, L. M. The Multi-Source Interference Task: an fMRI task that reliably activates the cingulo-frontal-parietal cognitive/attention network. Nat. Protoc. 1, 308-13 (2006).
8. Bush, G., Shin, L. M., Holmes, J., Rosen, B. R. & Vogt, B. A. The Multi-Source Interference Task: validation study with fMRI in individual subjects. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 60-70 (2003).
9. Egner, T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 380-390 (2007).
10. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H. & Donchin, E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 480-506 (1992).
11. Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S. & Notebaert, W. Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay. Psychol. Res. 78, 483-93 (2014).
12. Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N. & Notebaert, W. The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update. Front. Psychol. 5, 1-9 (2014).
13. Egner, T., Ely, S. & Grinband, J. Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Front. Psychol. 1, 154 (2010).
14. Mayr, U. & Awh, E. The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol. Res. Forsch. 73, 794-802 (2009).
15. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W. & Vu, K. P. L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol. Res. 68, 1-17 (2004).
16. Mayr, U., Awh, E. & Laurey, P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 450-452 (2003).
17. Schmidt, J. R. Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 615-30 (2013).
18. Egner, T. Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Front. Psychol. 5, 1-11 (2014).
19. Verguts, T. & Notebaert, W. Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 252-257 (2009).
20. Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N. & Notebaert, W. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation. PLoS One 9, e110462 (2014).
21. Freitas, A. L. & Clark, S. L. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks. Psychol. Res. 79, 143-62 (2015).
22. Kim, S. & Cho, Y. S. Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 149, 60-8 (2014).
23. Schmidt, J. & Weissman, D. Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. PLoS One 9, e102337 (2014).
24. Weissman, D., Jiang, J. & Egner, T. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 2022-2037 (2014).
25. Cavanagh, J. F. & Shackman, A. J. Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence. J. Physiol. in press (2014).
26. Horga, G. et al. Adaptation to conflict via context-driven anticipatory signals in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 16208-16216 (2011).
27. Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 79, 217-240 (2013).
28. Shenhav, A., Straccia, M., Cohen, J. D. & Botvinick, M. M. Anterior cingulate engagement in a foraging context reflects choice difficulty, not foraging value. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1249-1254 (2014).