Clinical simulation: A method for development and evaluation of clinical information systems

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 54, Issue , 2015, Pages 65-76

  Jensen, Sanne ^a   Kushniruk, Andre W ^b   Nøhr, Christian ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical information systems; Clinical practice guidelines; Clinical simulation; EHealth; Evaluation; Human factors

Indexed keywords

EHEALTH; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION USE; QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CLINICAL SIMULATION; DESIGN AND EVALUATIONS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES;

MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PLANNING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TELEHEALTH; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENMARK; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; TELEMEDICINE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DENMARK; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84927927855     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Rall M., Gaba D.M., Howard S.K. Human performance and patient safety. Anaesthesia 2010, 93-149. Elsevier Churchill Livingston. R.D. Miller (Ed.).
2. Kushniruk A.W., Patel V.L. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004, 37(1):56-76.
3. ISO 9241-210. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: human-centered design for interactive systems; 2010.
4. Borycki E, Kushniruk A, Anderson J, Anderson M. Designing and integrating clinical and computer-based simulations in health informatics: from real-world to virtual reality. In: Modeling, simulation and optimization: focus on applications; 2010. p. 31-52.
5. Jensen S., Lyng K.M., Nøhr C. The role of simulation in clinical information systems development. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012, 180:373-377.
6. Beaubien J.M., Baker D.P. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go?. BMJ Qual Saf 2004, 13:51-56.
7. Grenvik A., Schaefer J. From Resusci-Anne to Sim-Man: the evolution of simulators in medicine. Crit Care Med 2004, 32(2 Suppl.):S56-S57.
8. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Petrusa E.R., Scalese R.J. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 2010, 44(1):50-63.
9. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Cohen E.R., Barsuk J.H., Wayne D.B. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011, 86(6):706-711.
10. Struys M.M., De S.T., Mortier E.P. Simulated drug administration: an emerging tool for teaching clinical pharmacology during anesthesiology training. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008, 84(1):170-174.
11. Lippert A., Dieckmann P.G., Oestergaard D. Simulation in medicine. Notfall Rettungsmed 2009, 12:49-52.
12. Stefan M.S., Belforti R.K., Langlois G., Rothberg M.B. A simulation-based program to train medical residents to lead and perform advanced cardiovascular life support. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 2011, 39(4):63-69.
13. Wright S.W., Lindsell C.J., Hinckley W.R., Williams A., Holland C., Lewis C.H., et al. High fidelity medical simulation in the difficult environment of a helicopter: feasibility, self-efficacy and cost. BMC Med Educ 2006, 6:49.
14. Müller G., Rannenberg K. Multilateral security in communications. Technology, infrastructure, economy 1999, vol. 3. Addison-Wesley.
15. Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Comput Biol Med 2002, 32(3):141-149.
16. Anderson J.G. Evaluation in health informatics: computer simulation. Comput Biol Med 2002, 32(3):151-164.
17. Kushniruk A., Nohr C., Jensen S., Borycki E.M. From usability testing to clinical simulations: bringing context into the design and evaluation of usable and safe health information technologies. Contribution of the IMIA human factors engineering for healthcare informatics working group. Yearb Med Inform 2013, 8(1):78-85.
18. Sithole E, McClean S, Scotney B, Parr G, Moore B, Awson S. Simulation model driven performance evaluation for enterprise applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international ICST conference on simulation tools and technique. ICST, Brussels, Belgium; 2010.
19. ; 2012 [accessed 08.06.14]. http://www.regionh.dk/cgi-bin/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=0%26page_id=124099%26query=itx%20%26hiword=itx%20.
20. ; 2012 [accessed 08.06.14]. http://www.regionh.dk/dims-eng/menu/About+DIMS/About+DIMS.htm.
21. Ammenwerth E., Hackl W.O., Jensen S., Lawton K., Riedmann D., Jung M. Impact evaluation of innovative technology: estimating the impact of the PSIP solutions. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 166:227-233.
22. Lawton K., Binzer K., Skjoet P., Jensen S. Lessons learnt from conducting a high fidelity simulation test in health IT. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 166:217-226.
23. Rasmussen S.L., Lyng K.M., Jensen S. Achieving IT-supported standardized nursing documentation through participatory design. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012, 180:1055-1059.
24. Jensen S, Meyer J, Krarup AL, Dahl J. AXHIS - Metode til vurdering af it-systemer inden implementering; 2007. [in Danish, last accessed 08.06.14]. http://www.regionh.dk/NR/rdonlyres/73D38407-10EF-4CC2-A8B7-65BA4392C7D7/0/MasetrfraITUAXHIS.pdf.
25. Jensen S., Vingtoft S., Nohr C. Benefits of a clinical planning and coordination module: a simulation study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013, 183:220-224.
26. Ammenwerth E., Hackl W.O., Binzer K., Christoffersen T.E., Jensen S., Lawton K., et al. Simulation studies for the evaluation of health information technologies: experiences and results. HIM J 2012, 41(2):14-21.
27. Rasmussen S.L., Jensen S., Lyng K.M. Clinical simulation as a boundary object in design of health IT-systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013, 194:173-178.
28. Jensen S., Rasmussen S.L., Lyng K.M. Use of clinical simulation for assessment in EHR-procurement: design of method. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013, 192:576-580.
29. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT's). Part 11: Guidance on usability; 1998.
30. Dahl Y., Alsos O.A., Svanæs D. Fidelity considerations for simulation-based usability assessments of mobile ICT for hospitals. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 2010, 26(5):445-476.
31. Hanson D., Hoss B.L., Wesorick B. Evaluating the evidence: guidelines. AORN J 2008, 16:388-393.
32. National Board of Health in Denmark. Clinical Practice Guidelines concerning patients with chronicle diseases; recommendations from the Danish National Board of Health in Denmark; 2014 [in Danish, last accessed 08.06.14].
33. Program for projects concerning chronicle patients in the Capital Region of Denmark 2011; 2012. [accessed 08.06.14]. http://www.regionh.dk/NR/rdonlyres/F783D082-5E74-469D-87A9-88755A39A9A3/0/%20Kronikerprogrammets_projektkatalog_sep_2011.
34. Hogan T.P., Wakefield B., Nazi K.M., Houston T.K., Weaver F.M. Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: recommendations for VA's Home Telehealth and personal health record programs. J Gen Int Med 2011, 26(Suppl. 2):628-635.
35. Jackson G.L., Krein S.L., Darkins A.W., Gunnar W., Harada N.D., et al. Defining core issues in utilizing information technology to improve access: evaluation and research agenda. J Gen Intern Med: Soc Gen Intern Med 2011, 26(Suppl. 2):623-627.
36. Vingtoft S, Christensen AS. Demonstrationsprojekt af it understøttelse it understøttelse af forløbsprogrammedr. Chronic 5 pre-analysis centept report. Capital Region of Denmark; 2011 [in danish].
37. Peute L.W., Spithoven R., Bakker R., Jaspers M.W. Usability studies on interactive health information systems; where do we stand? [User interfaces, assessment-evaluation, health professional workstation]. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 327-332.
38. Rossnagel H, Zibuschaka J. Using mobile media for emergency management - a design approach. In: Proceedings of the 8th international ISCRAM conference 2011.
39. Borycki E.M., Kushniruk A.W., Kuwata S., Kannry J. Use of simulation approaches in the study of clinician workflow. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006, 61-65.
40. Jensen S, Rasmussen SL, Lyng KM. Evaluation of a clinical simulation-based assessment method for EHR-platforms; 2014.
41. Carroll J.M. Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interact Comput 2000, 13(1):43-60.
42. Kushniruk A.W., Turner P. Who's users? Participation and empowerment in socio-technical approaches to health IT developments. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 164:280-285.
43. Jensen S., Nohr C., Rasmussen S.L. Fidelity in clinical simulation: how low can you go?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013, 194:147-153.
44. Dahlbäck N., Jönsson A., Ahrenberg L. Wizard of Oz - why and how. Knowledge-Based Syst 1993, 6:258-266. [Intelligent User Interfaces].
45. Molin L. Wizard-of-Oz prototyping for cooperative interaction design of graphical user interfaces. Nordic conference on human-computer interaction 2004, 425-428. ACM.
46. Jaspers M.W.M., Steen T., Bos C.v.d., Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform 2004, 77(11):781-795.
47. Kragelund L. Obser-view seen as a data generating method and a learning space; 2009. [accessed 08.06.14]. http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Om_SDU/Institutter/Ifpr/Konferencer/Adult_Learning/Abstracts/3%20LindaKragelund.pdf.
48. Ammenwerth E., Iller C., Mansmann U. Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. Int J Med Inform 2003, 70(2-3):237-248.
49. Kvale S. The qualitative research interview: a phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. J Phenomenol Psychol 1983, 14:171-196.
50. Kjeldskov J., Skov M.B., Stage J. Instant data analysis: conducting usability evaluations in a day. NordiCHI '04 proceedings of the third Nordic conference on human-computer interaction 2004, ACM.
51. Nvivo. ; 2012 [accessed 08.06.14]. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx.