Use of clinical simulation for assessment in EHR-procurement: Design of method

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 192, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 576-580

  Jensen, Sanne ^a,b   Rasmussen, Stine L ^b   Lyng, Karen M ^b,c  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b IT   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biomedical Technology Assessment; Clinical Simulation; Healthcare Informatics; Human Factors

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; HEALTH; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES; CLINICAL SIMULATION; DESIGN PROCESS; HEALTH CARE INFORMATICS; HEALTH INFORMATICS; LARGE REGIONS; PUBLIC INTERVENTIONS; WORK PRACTICES;

DESIGN;

BIOENGINEERING; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DENMARK; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HOSPITAL PURCHASING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DENMARK; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PURCHASING, HOSPITAL; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84894382645     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-576     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rall M, Gaba DM, Howard SK. Human performance and patient safety. 93-149. 2010. Anaesthesia, Elsevier.
2. ISO 9241-210, Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210:Human-centered design for interac systems 2010.
3. Jensen S, Kanstrup AM et al. User driven development and high fidelity testing. 2011. Proc 11 Danish HCI Res Symp.
4. Rinkus S, Walji M, Johnson-Throop KA, et al. Humancentered design of a distributed knowledge management system. J Biomed Inform 2005 Feb;38(1):4-17.
5. Koppel R, Wettemeck T, Telles J, Karsh B. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes and threats to patient safety. 2008.
6. Kushniruk A, Borycki E et al. Predicting changes in workflow resulting from healthcare information systems: ensuring the safety of healthcare77. HealthcQ2006;9:114-8.
7. Patterson ES, Cook RI, et al. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9(5):540-53.
8. Maguire M, Bewan N. User requirement analysis A review of supporting methods. 133-148. 2002. Proceedings of IFIP 17th World Computer Congress, Montreal, Canada.
9. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems 86. J Biomed Inform 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76.
10. http://www.regionh.dk/topmenu/omRegionH/Interne+servi cevirksomheder/It+Medico+og+Telefoni/Projekter/It-Sundhedsplatformen/ (last accessed December 9th 2012).
11. ISO 9241-11, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT's). Part 11: Guidance on usability. 1998.
12. Ammenwerth E, Hackl WO et al. Simulation studies for the evaluation of health information techn.: experiences and results.41(2),14-21.2012.Health Inform Man Journal.
13. Jensen S, Vingtoft S, Nøhr C. Benefits of a Clinical Planning and Coordination Module: A Simulation Study. 2013.
14. Nøhr C, Jensen S. Virtual Centre for Health Informatics at Aalborg Universityr and IT Experimentarium, Capital Region, Denmark. 2011. 15th Human Factors Engineering in Health Informatics Symposium, Trondheim, Norway.
15. Pedersen BS, Jeberg KA, et al. IT for advanced life support in hospitals. Stud Health Tech Infor.2009;143:429-34.
16. Rasmussen SL, Lyng KM, Jensen S. Achieving itsupported standardized nursing documentation through participated design. 2012. The 24th Med Info in Europe.
17. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology . 13(3), 319-340. 1989. MIS Quarterly, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota.
18. Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W, Seffah A. Consolidating the ISO Usability Models. . 2003. Proceedings at 11th annual International Software Quality Management Conference.
19. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Updata. 19(4), 9-30. 2003. Journ of Mangement Infor Systems.
20. Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW, et al. Use of simulation in the study of clinician workflow 76. AMIA Proc 2006;61-5.
21. Jensen S, Lyng KM, Nøhr C. The role of simulation in clinical information systems development. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;180:373-7.
22. De Keizer N, Hyppönen H, Ammenwerth E. Developing Quality Indicators for IT Interventions in Health Care. 2012. 24th International Conf of the European Informatics Quality of Life through Quality of Information MIE 2012.
23. Kushniruk A, Turner P. A Framework for User Involvement and Context in the Design of Safe e-Health Systems. 353-357. 2012. European Fed for Medicial Informatics: Quality of Life through Quality of Information, IOS Press.
24. Carrol JM. Five reasons for scenario-based design. 13[Interacting with Computers], 43-60. 2000. Elsevier.
25. Ammenwerth E, Kaiser F, et al. Evaluation of user acceptance of information systems in health care-the value of questionnaires. Stud Health Technol Inform2003; 95:643-8