Five reasons for scenario-based design

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 43-60

  Carroll, J M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONSTRAINT THEORY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

SCENARIO BASED DESIGN; TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE; WORK ORIENTED COMMUNICATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0343826827     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ackoff R.L. Resurrecting the future of operations research. Journal of the Operations Research Society. 30:(3):1979a;189-199.
2. Ackoff R.L. The future of operations research is past. Journal of the Operations Research Society. 30:(2):1979b;93-104.
3. Brooks F. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Anniversary Edition :1995;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. (originally 1975).
4. Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B. Usability specifications as a tool in iterative development. Hartson H.R. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. 1985;Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
5. Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., 1990. Human-computer interaction scenarios as a design representation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (Kailua-Kona, HI, 2-5 January, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 555-561.
6. Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B. Deliberated evolution: stalking the view matcher in design space. Human-Computer Interaction. 6:1991;281-318.
7. Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B. Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 10:1992;181-212.
8. Carroll J.M. The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Carroll J.M. Making use a design representation. Communications of the ACM. 37:(12):1994;29-35.
10. Carroll J.M. Scenario-based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;Wiley, New York.
11. Checkland P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. 1981;Wiley, New York.
12. Chin G., Rosson M.B., Carroll J.M. Participatory analysis: shared development of requirements from scenarios. Pemberton S. Proceedings of CHI'97: Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, 22-27 March). 1997;162-169 ACM Press/Addition-Wesley, New York.
13. Churchman W. Operations research as a profession. Management Science. 17:(2):1970;37-53.
14. Duval S., Wicklund R.A. A Theory of Objective Self-Awareness. 1972;Academic Press, New York.
15. Erikson E.H. Identity and the Life Cycle. 1980;Norton, New York.
16. Festinger L., Riecken H.W., Schachter S. When Prophecy Fails. 1956;University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
17. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. 1957;Harper and Row, New York.
18. Gagne R.M., Briggs L.J. Principles of instructional design. 1979;Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
19. Hutchins C.M. The acoustics of violin plates. Scientific American. 245:(4):1981;170-186.
20. Jacobson I. The use-case construct in object-oriented software engineering. Carroll J.M. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;309-336 Wiley, New York.
21. Karat J., Bennett J.B. Using scenarios in design meetings - a case study example. Karat J. Taking Design Seriously: Practical Techniques for Human-Computer Interaction Design. 1991;63-94 Academic Press, Boston, MA.
22. Kyng M. Creating context for design. Carroll J.M. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;85-107 Wiley, New York.
23. McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. 1994;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (original edition, 1964).
24. Muller M.J., Tudor L.G., Wildman D.M., White E.A., Root R.A., Dayton T., Carr R., Diekmann B., Dystra-Erickson E. Bifocal tools for scenarios and representations in participatory activities with users. Carroll J.M. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;135-163 Wiley, New York.
25. Nisbett R.E., Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental process. Psychological Review. 84:1997;231-259.
26. Potts, C., 1995. Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. In: DIS'95: ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, Ann Arbor, MI,. ACM Press, New York, pp. 247-256.
27. Schön D.A. Technology and Change: The New Heraclitus. 1967;Pergamon Press, New York.
28. Schön D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. 1983;Basic Books, New York.
29. Schön D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. 1987;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
30. Schriver K. Dynamics in Document Design. 1997;Wiley, New York.
31. Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. Tyler R., Gagne R., Scriven M. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. 1967;39-83 Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
32. Wirfs-Brock R. Designing objects and their interactions: a brief look at responsibility-driven design. Carroll J.M. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. 1995;337-360 Wiley, New York.