In-feed supplementation of trans-cinnamaldehyde reduces layer- chicken egg-borne transmission of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 2985-2994

  Upadhyaya, Indu ^a   Upadhyay, Abhinav ^a   Kollanoor Johny, Anup ^a,c   Mooyottu, Shankumar ^a   Baskaran, Sangeetha A ^a,d   Yin, Hsin Bai ^a   Schreiber, David T ^a   Khan, Mazhar I ^a   Darre, Michael J ^a   Curtis, Patricia A ^b   Venkitanarayanan, Kumar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BIRDS; CELL CULTURE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES; MACROPHAGES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FOOD-BORNE PATHOGENS; GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; PLANT COMPOUNDS; REAL-TIME QUANTITATIVE PCR; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; VIRULENCE FACTORS;

SALMONELLA;

ALDEHYDE; BACTERIAL DISEASE; DISEASE SPREAD; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; EGG; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; POULTRY; SURVIVAL;

UNITED STATES;

AVES; CINNAMOMUM VERUM; GALLUS GALLUS; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

ACROLEIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CINNAMALDEHYDE; VIRULENCE FACTOR;

ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CECUM; CHICKEN; DRUG EFFECTS; EGG; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LIVER; MACROPHAGE; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROBIOLOGY; OVIDUCT; PHYSIOLOGY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; UNITED STATES;

ACROLEIN; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CECUM; CHICKENS; EGGS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LIVER; MACROPHAGES; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; OVIDUCTS; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; UNITED STATES; VIRULENCE FACTORS;

EID: 84927800891     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03809-14     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. CDC. 2010. CDC report on Salmonella serotype Enteritidis infection. CDC, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/nczved/divisions/dfbmd/diseases/salmonella_enteritidis.
2. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 5:607-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0505.990502.
3. USDA. 2012. Poultry and eggs: background. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/poultry-eggs/background.aspx. Accessed 28 September 2012.
4. Guard-Petter J. 2001. The chicken, the egg and Salmonella Enteritidis. Environ Microbiol 3:421-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00213.x.
5. Braden CR. 2006. Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: a national epidemic in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 43:512-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505973.
6. CDC. 2012. Salmonella. CDC, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/enteritidis/. Accessed March 2012.
7. FDA. 2009. FDA improves egg safety. http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm170640.htm. Accessed 30 September 2012.
8. Allen-Vercoe E, Woodward MJ. 1999. Colonization of the chicken cecum by afimbriate and aflagellate derivatives of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. Vet Microbiol 69:265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00114-5.
9. Stern NJ. 2008. Salmonella species and Campylobacter jejuni cecal colonization model in broilers. Poult Sci 87:2399-2403. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00140.
10. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Gast R, Humphrey TJ, Van Immerseel F. 2009. Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:718-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00161.x.
11. Miyamoto T, Baba E, Tanaka T, Sasai K, Fukata T, Arakawa A. 1997. Salmonella Enteritidis contamination of eggs from hens inoculated by vaginal, cloacal, and intravenous routes. Avian Dis 41:296-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1592181.
12. Okamura M, Kamijima Y, Miyamoto T, Tani H, Sasai K, Baba E. 2001. Differences among six Salmonella serovars in abilities to colonize reproductive organs and to contaminate eggs in laying hens. Avian Dis 45:61-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593012.
13. Gast RK, Guraya R, Guard-Bouldin J, Holt PS, Moore RW. 2007. Colonization of specific regions of the reproductive tract and deposition at different locations inside eggs laid by hens infected with Salmonella Enteritidis or Salmonella Heidelberg. Avian Dis 51:40-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2007)051[0040:COSROT]2.0.CO;2.
14. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Van Immerseel F. 2008. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genes induced during oviduct colonization and egg contamination in laying hens. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6616-6622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01087-08.
15. Thiagarajan D, Saeed AM, Asem EK. 1994. Mechanism of transovarian transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis in laying hens. Poult Sci 73:89-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730089.
16. Thiagarajan D, Saeed M, Turek J, Asem E. 1996. In vitro attachment and invasion of chicken ovarian granulosa cells by Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 8. Infect Immun 64:5015-5021.
17. Altekruse S, Koehler J, Hickman-Brenner F, Tauxe RV, Ferris K. 1993. A comparison of Salmonella Enteritidis phage types from egg-associated outbreaks and implicated laying flocks. Epidemiol Infect 110:17-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800050639.
18. Namata H, Méroc E, Aerts M, Faes C, Abrahantes JC, Imberechts H, Mintiens K. 2008. Salmonella in Belgian laying hens: an identification of risk factors. Prev Vet Med 83:323-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.002.
19. Keller LH, Benson CE, Krotec K, Eckroade RJ. 1995. Salmonella Enteritidis colonization of the reproductive tract and forming and freshly laid eggs of chickens. Infect Immun 63:2443-2449.
20. Clavijo RI, Loui C, Andersen GL, Riley LW, Lu S. 2006. Identification of genes associated with survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken egg albumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1055-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.2.1055-1064.2006.
21. Stern NJ, Cox NA, Bailey JS, Berrang ME, Musgrove MT. 2001. Comparison of mucosal competitive exclusion and competitive exclusion treatment to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 80:156-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.2.156.
22. Higgins SE, Erf GF, Higgins JP, Henderson SN, Wolfenden AD, Gaona-Ramirez G, Hargis BM. 2007. Effect of probiotic treatment in broiler chicks on intestinal macrophage numbers and phagocytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis by abdominal exudate cells. Poult Sci 86:2315-2321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00123.
23. Fiorentin L, Vieira ND, Barioni W, Jr. 2005. Oral treatment with bacteriophages reduces the concentration of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 in caecal contents of broilers. Avian Pathol 34:258-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340500112157.
24. Byrd JA, Hargis BM, Caldwell DJ, Bailey RH, Herron KL, McReynolds JL, Brewer RL, Anderson RC, Bischoff KM, Callaway TR, Kubena LF. 2001. Effect of lactic acid administration in the drinking water during preslaughter feed withdrawal on Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of broilers. Poult Sci 80:278-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.3.278.
25. Heres L, Engel B, Urlings HAP, Wagner JA, van Knapen F. 2004. Effect of acidified feed on susceptibility of broiler chickens to intestinal infection by Campylobacter and Salmonella. Vet Microbiol 99:259-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.12.008.
26. Fernandez F, Hinton M, Van Gils B. 2002. Dietary mannanoligosaccharides and their effect on chicken caecal microflora in relation to Salmonella Enteritidis colonization. Avian Pathol 31:49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450120106000.
27. Spring P, Wenk C, Dawson KA, Newman KA. 2000. The effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the caeca of Salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poult Sci 79:205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.2.205.
28. Chadfield MS, Hinton MH. 2004. Effects of furazolidone pretreatment of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 at sub-and supra-inhibitory concentrations on phagocytosis and intracellular survival in chicken macrophages. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 100:81-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.03.004.
29. Inoue AY, Berchieri A, Jr, Bernardino A, Paiva JB, Sterzo EV. 2008. Passive immunity of progeny from broiler breeders vaccinated with oilemulsion bacterin against Salmonella Enteritidis. Avian Dis 52:567-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1637/8096-082707-Reg.1.
30. Abee T, Krockel L, Hill C. 1995. Bacteriocins: modes of action and potentials in food preservation and control of food poisoning. Int J Food Microbiol 28:169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(95)00055-0.
31. Salamci E, Kordali S, Kotan R, Cakir A, Kaya Y. 2007. Chemical compositions, antimicrobial and herbicidal effects of essential oils isolated from Turkish Tanacetum aucheranum and Tanacetum chiliophyllum var. chiliophyllum. Biochem Syst Ecol 35:569-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2007.03.012.
32. Wollenweber E. 1988. Occurrence of flavonoid aglycones in medicinal plants. Prog Clin Biol Res 180:45-55.
33. Burt S. 2004. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods-a review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:223-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022.
34. Holley RA, Patel D. 2005. Improvement of shelf life and safety of perishable foods by plant essential oils and smoke antimicrobials. Food Microbiol 22:273-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2004.08.006.
35. Dixon RA. 2001. Natural products and plant disease. Nature 411:843-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35081178.
36. Reichling J. 2010. Plant-microbe interactions and secondary metabolites with antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. Annu Plant Rev 39:214-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444318876.ch4.
37. Williams JE. 2001. Review of antiviral and immunomodulating properties of plants of the Peruvian rainforest with a particular emphasis on Una de Gato and Sangre de Grado. Altern Med Rev 6:567-579. http://www.altmedrev.com/publications/6/6/567.pdf.
38. Kollanoor-Johny A, Mattson T, Baskaran SA, Amalaradjou MA, Babapoor S, March B, Valipe S, Darre M, Hoagland T, Schreiber D, Khan MI, Donoghue A, Donoghue D, Venkitanarayanan K. 2012. Reduction of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization in 20-day-old broiler chickens by the plant-derived compounds trans-cinnamaldehyde and eugenol. Appl Environ Microbiol 8:2981-2987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07643-11.
39. Amalaradjou MAR, Venkitanarayanan K. 2011. Effect of transcinnamaldehyde on inhibition and inactivation of Cronobacter sakazakii biofilm on abiotic surfaces. J Food Prot 74:200-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-296.
40. Amalaradjou MAR, Narayanan A, Baskaran SA, Venkitanarayanan K. 2010. Antibiofilm effect of trans-cinnamaldehyde on uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Urol 184:358-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.006.
41. Ebers KL, Zhang CY, Zhang MZ, Bailey RH, Zhang S. 2009. Transcriptional profiling avian beta-defensins in chicken oviduct epithelial cells before and after infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. BMC Microbiol 9:153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-153.
42. Upadhyaya I, Upadhyay A, Kollanoor-Johny A, Darre M, Venkitanarayanan K. 2013. Effect of plant derived antimicrobials on Salmonella Enteritidis adhesion to and invasion of primary chicken oviduct epithelial cells in vitro and virulence gene expression. Int J Mol Sci 14:10608-10625. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms140510608.
43. Kannan L, Rath NC, Liyanage R, Lay JO, Jr. 2007. Identification and characterization of thymosin beta-4 in chicken macrophages using whole cell MALDI-TOF. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1112:425-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1415.028.
44. Roessler EB, Pangborn RM, Sidel JL, Stone H. 1978. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired-preference, paired difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. J Food Sci 43:940-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02458.x.
45. Erturk HN. 1999. Ph.D. thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
46. Retamal P, Castillo-Ruiz M, Mora GC. 2009. Characterization of MgtC, a virulence factor of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. PLoS One 4:e5551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005551.
47. Cerquetti MC, Gherardi MM. 2000. Orally administered attenuated Salmonella Enteritidis reduces chicken cecal carriage of virulent Salmonella challenge organisms. Vet Microbiol 76:185-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00235-2.
48. Van Immerseel F, Buck JD, Smet ID, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. 2004. Interactions of butyric acid-and acetic acid-treated Salmonella with chicken primary cecal epithelial cells in vitro. Avian Dis 48:384-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1637/7094.
49. Tiihonen K, Kettunen H, Bento MHL, Saarinen M, Lahtinen S, Ouwehand AC, Schulze H, Rautonen N. 2010. The effect of feeding essential oils on broiler performance and gut microbiota. Br Poult Sci 51:381-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.496446.
50. Jamroz D, Wiliczkiewicz A, Wertelecki T, Orda J, Skorupiska J. 2005. Use of active substances of plant origin in chicken diets based on maize and locally grown cereals. Br Poult Sci 46:485-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660500191056.
51. Goh EB, Yim G, Tsui W, McClure J, Surette MG, Davies J. 2002. Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:17025-17030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252607699.
52. Fonseca AP, Extremina C, Fonseca AF, Sousa JC. 2004. Effect of subinhibitory concentration of piperacillin/tazobactam on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 53:903-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.45637-0.
53. De Buck J, van Immerseel F, Meulemans G, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. 2003. Adhesion of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates to chicken isthmal glandular secretions. Vet Microbiol 93:223-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00038-5.
54. De Buck J, van Immerseel F, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. 2004. Effect of type 1 fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis on bacteremia and reproductive tract infection in laying hens. Avian Pathol 33:314-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0307945042000220561.
55. Li S, Zhang Z, Pace L, Lillehoj H, Zhang S. 2009. Functions exerted by the virulence-associated type-three secretion systems during Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis invasion into and survival within chicken oviduct epithelial cells and macrophages. Avian Pathol 38:97-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079450902737771.
56. Porter SB, Curtiss R. 1997. Effect of Inv mutations on Salmonella virulence and colonization in 1-day-old White Leghorn chicks. Avian Dis 41:45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1592442.
57. Lu S, Killoran PB, Riley LW. 2003. Association of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis yafD with resistance to chicken egg albumen. Infect Immun 71:6734-6741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.71.12.6734-6741.2003.
58. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, van Immerseel F. 2009. The Salmonella Enteritidis lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene rfbH is required for survival in egg albumen. Zoonoses Public Health 56:145-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01195.x.
59. Shah DH, Casavant C, Hawley Q, Addwebi T, Call DR, Guard-Petter J. 2012. Salmonella Enteritidis strains from poultry exhibit differential responses to acid stress, oxidative stress, and survival in the egg albumen. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:258-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1009.
60. Bohez L, Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Dewulf J, Haesebrouck F, van Immerseel F. 2008. The Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 regulator ssrA promotes reproductive tract but not intestinal colonization in chickens. Vet Microbiol 126:216-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.06.025.
61. De Groote MA, Ochsner UA, Shiloh MU, Nathan C, McCord JM, Dinauer MC, Libby SJ, Vazquez-Torres A, Xu Y, Fang FC. 1997. Periplasmic superoxide dismutase protects Salmonella from products of phagocyte NADPH-oxidase and nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:13997-14001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.25.13997.
62. Lesnick ML, Reiner NE, Fierer J, Guiney DG. 2001. The Salmonella spvB virulence gene encodes an enzyme that ADP-ribosylates actin and destabilizes the cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol 39:1464-1470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02360.x.
63. Otto H, Tezcan-Merdol D, Girisch R, Haag F, Rhen M, Koch-Nolte F. 2000. The spvB gene-product of the Salmonella enterica virulence plasmid is a mono(ADP-ribosyl) transferase. Mol Microbiol 37:1106-1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02064.x.
64. Kollanoor-Johny A. 2011. Investigating the potential of natural antimicrobial molecules for reducing Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization in chickens. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
65. Niu C, Gilbert ES. 2004. Colorimetric method for identifying plant essential oil components that affect biofilm formation and structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6951-6956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.12.6951-6956.2004.
66. Brackman G, Defoirdt T, Miyamoto C, Bossier P, Van Calenbergh S, Nelis H, Coenye T. 2008. Cinnamaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde derivatives reduce virulence in Vibrio spp. by decreasing the DNA-binding activity of the quorum sensing response regulator LuxR. BMC Microbiol 8:149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-149.