Salmonella enteritidis strains from poultry exhibit differential responses to acid stress, oxidative stress, and survival in the egg albumen

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 258-264

  Shah, Devendra H ^a   Casavant, Carol ^a   Hawley, Quincy ^b   Addwebi, Tarek ^a   Call, Douglas R ^a   Guard, Jean ^c  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OVALBUMIN;

ACIDITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; BACTERIAL VIRULENCE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FOOD CONTAMINATION; GENE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; POULTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLOSIS;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CHICKENS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; EGG WHITE; ENTERITIS; HOT TEMPERATURE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEAT; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS; SIGMA FACTOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VIRULENCE;

GALLUS GALLUS; MUS; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

EID: 84857881103     PISSN: 15353141     EISSN: 15567125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2011.1009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Betancor L, Yim L, Fookes M, et al. Genomic and phenotypic variation in epidemic-spanning Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates. BMC Microbiol 2009;9:237.
2. Call DR, Borucki MK, Besser TE. Mixed-genome microarrays reveal multiple serotype and lineage-specific differences among strains of Listeria monocytogenes. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:632-639.
3. Carter PB, Collins FM. The route of enteric infection in normal mice. J Exp Med 1974;139:1189-203.
4. Chappell L, Kaiser P, Barrow P, et al. The immunobiology of avian systemic salmonellosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009;128:53-59.
5. Clavijo RI, Loui C, Andersen GL, et al. Identification of genes associated with survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken egg albumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:1055-1064.
6. Desmidt M, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis phage type four after experimental infection of young chickens. Vet Microbiol 1997;56:99-109.
7. Dhillon AS, Alisantosa B, Shivaprasad HL, et al. Pathogenicity of Salmonella enteritidis phage types 4, 8, and 23 in broiler chicks. Avian Dis 1999;43:506-515.
8. [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks in the European Union in 2006. EFSA J 2007;130: 34-117.
9. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, et al. Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009;33:718-738.
10. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis genes induced during oviduct colonization and egg contamination in laying hens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:6616-2662.
11. Gast RK, Beard CW. Isolation of Salmonella Enteritidis from internal organs of experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis 1990; 34:991-993.
12. Gast RK, Benson ST. Intestinal colonization and organ invasion in chicks experimentally infected with Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 and other phage types isolated from poultry in the United States. Avian Dis 1996;40:853-857.
13. Gast RK, Benson ST. The comparative virulence for chicks of Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 isolates and isolates of phage types commonly found in poultry in the United States. Avian Dis 1995;39:567-774.
14. Gast RK. Understanding Salmonella Enteritidis in laying chickens: The contributions of experimental infections. Int J Food Microbiol 1994;21:107-116.
15. Guard-Bouldin J, Gast RK, Humphrey TJ, et al. Subpopulation characteristics of egg-contaminating Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis as defined by the lipopolysaccharide O chain. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:2756-2763.
16. Henderson SC, Bounous DI, Lee MD. Early events in the pathogenesis of avian salmonellosis. Infect Immun 1999;67:3580-3586.
17. Hengge-Aronis R. Recent insights into the general stress response regulatory network in Escherichia coli. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;4:341-346.
18. Hengge-Aronis R. Stationary phase gene regulation: What makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigmaS-selective? Curr Opin Microbiol 2002;5:591-595.
19. Humphrey TJ, Richardson NP, Statton KM, et al. Effects of temperature shift on acid and heat tolerance in Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59: 3120-3122.
20. Humphrey TJ, Slater E, McAlpine K, et al. Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 isolates more tolerant of heat, acid, or hydrogen peroxide also survive longer on surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61:3161-3164.
21. Humphrey TJ, Williams A, McAlpine K, et al. Isolates of Salmonella enterica Enteritidis PT4 with enhanced heat and acidtolerance are more virulent in mice and more invasive in chickens. Epidemiol Infect 1996;117:79-88.
22. Jorgensen F, Leach S, Wilde SJ, et al. Invasiveness in chickens, stress resistance and RpoS status of wild-type Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive type 104 and serovar Enteritidis phage type 4 strains. Microbiology 2000;146:3227-3235.
23. Joyner WL, Kokas E. Action of serotonin on gastric (proventriculus) secretion in chickens. Comp Gen Pharmacol 1971; 2:145-150.
24. Kang H, Loui C, Clavijo RI, et al. Survival characteristics of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken egg albumen. Epidemiol Infect 2006;134:967-976.
25. Kim CC, Joyce EA, Chan K, et al. Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis. Genome Biol 2002;3:RESEARCH0065.
26. Kimura AC, Reddy V, Marcus R, et al. Chicken consumption is a newly identified risk factor for sporadic Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis infections in the United States: A case-control study in FoodNet sites. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:S244-S252.
27. Kogut M, Rothwell L, Kaiser P. Differential effects of age on chicken heterophil functional activation by recombinant chicken interleukin-2. Dev Comp Immunol 2002;26:817-830.
28. Lu S, Killoran PB, Riley LW. Association of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis yafD with resistance to chicken egg albumen. Infect Immun 2003;71:6734-6741.
29. Morales CA, Musgrove M, Humphrey TJ, et al. Pathotyping of Salmonella enterica by analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in cyaA and flanking 23S ribosomal sequences. Environ Microbiol 2007;9:1047-1059.
30. Morales CA, Porwollik S, Frye JG, et al. Correlation of phenotype with the genotype of egg-contaminating Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:4388-4399.
31. Nickerson CA, Curtiss R, 3rd. Role of sigma factor RpoS in initial stages of Salmonella typhimurium infection. Infect Immun 1997;65:1814-1823.
32. Okamura M, Lillehoj HS, Raybourne RB, et al. Differential responses of macrophages to Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2005;107:327-335.
33. Olsen JE, Tiainen T, Brown DJ. Levels of virulence are not determined by genomic lineage of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains. Epidemiol Infect 1999;123:423-430.
34. Olson AB, Andrysiak AK, Tracz DM, et al. Limited genetic diversity in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis PT13. BMC Microbiol 2007;7:87.
35. Patrick ME, Adcock PM, Gomez TM, et al. Salmonella Enteritidis infections, United States, 1985-1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1-7.
36. Petter JG. Detection of two smooth colony phenotypes in a Salmonella Enteritidis isolate which vary in their ability to contaminate eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:2884-2890.
37. Poppe C, Demczuk W, McFadden K, et al. Virulence of Salmonella Enteritidis phagetypes 4, 8 and 13 and other Salmonella spp. for day-old chicks, hens and mice. Can J Vet Res 1993;57:281-287.
38. Porwollik S, Santiviago CA, Cheng P, et al. Differences in gene content between Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates and comparison to closely related serovars Gallinarum and Dublin. J Bacteriol 2005;187:6545-6555.
39. Qureshi MA, Heggen CL, Hussain I. Avian macrophage: Effector functions in health and disease. Dev Comp Immunol 2000;24:103-119.
40. Robbe-Saule V, Algorta G, Rouilhac I, et al. Characterization of the RpoS status of clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:4352-4358.
41. Robbe-Saule V, Coynault C, Ibanez-Ruiz M, Hermant D, Norel F. Identification of a non-haem catalase in Salmonella and its regulation by RpoS (sigmaS). Mol Microbiol 2001;39: 1533-1545.
42. Shah DH, Zhou X, Addwebi T, et al. Cell invasion of poultryassociated Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates is associated with pathogenicity, motility and proteins secreted by the type III secretion system. Microbiology 2011;157: 1428-1445.
43. Stabler JG, McCormick TW, Powell KC, et al. Avian heterophils and monocytes: Phagocytic and bactericidal activities against Salmonella enteritidis. Vet Microbiol 1994;38:293-305.
44. Taylor WI, Achanzar D. Catalase test as an aid to the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol 1972;24:58-61.
45. Thomson NR, Clayton DJ, Windhorst D, et al. Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways. Genome Res 2008;18:1624-1637.
46. Van Immerseel F. Stress-induced survival strategies enable Salmonella Enteritidis to persistently colonize the chicken oviduct tissue and cope with antimicrobial factors in egg white: A hypothesis to explain a pandemic. Gut Pathog 2010;2:23.
47. [WHO] World Health Organization. 2008. Available at http://www.who.int/ gfn/activities/CDB-poster-Sept09.pdf, accessed December 15,2011.
48. Williams A, Davies AC, Wilson J, et al. Contamination of the contents of intact eggs by Salmonella Typhimurium DT104. Vet Rec 1998;143:562-563.
49. Withanage GS, Mastroeni P, Brooks HJ, et al. Oxidative and nitrosative responses of the chicken macrophage cell line MQNCSU to experimental Salmonella infection. Br Poult Sci 2005;46:261-267.
50. Yim L, Betancor L, Martinez A, et al. Differential phenotypic diversity among epidemic-spanning Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates from humans or animals. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010;76:6812-6820.