Public involvement in research: Making sense of the diversity

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 45-51

  Oliver, Sandy ^a   Liabo, Kristin ^a   Stewart, Ruth ^a,b   Rees, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Consumer involvement in research; Patient involvement in research; Public involvement in research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONSULTATION; EMPOWERMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ATTITUDE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN RELATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES;

ATTITUDE; COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84927734223     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: 17581060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1355819614551848     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, et al. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 21–33.
2. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 89.
3. Oliver S. Public and consumer participation in policy and research. In: Heggenhougen K and Quah S (eds) International encyclopedia of public health 6. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008, pp.408–415.
4. Collins HM and Evans R. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci 2002; 32: 235–285.
5. O’Connell D and Mosconi P. An active role for patients in clinical research? Drug Dev Res 2006; 67: 188.
6. Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR, et al. Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect 2009; 12: 209–220.
7. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. The PIRICOM study: a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care reearch. Coventry: University of Warwick, 2010.
8. Staley K and Hanley B. Scoping research priority setting (and the presence of PPI in priority setting) with UK clinical research organisations and funders. Oxford: The James Lind Alliance, 2008.
9. Telford R, Boote JD and Cooper CL. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect 2004; 7: 220.
10. Shippee N, Domecq JP, Prutsky G, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2013; Early View 3 June.
11. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, et al. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5: iii–157.
12. Smith G and Wales C. Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy. Polit Stud 2002; 48: 51–65.
13. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1–148.
14. Mullen P and Spurgeon P. Priority setting and the public. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliff Medical Press Ltd, 2000.
15. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 1969; 35: 216–224.
16. Tritter JQ and McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 2006; 76: 156–168.
17. Stewart R and Liabo K. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17: 248–251.
18. Stewart R. Expertise and multi-disciplinary training for evidence-informed decision making. PhD Thesis, London: Institute of Education, University of London, 2007.
19. Renn O, Webler T and Wiedemann P. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. London: Kluwer Academic, 1995.
20. O’Donnell M and Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of funders. Health Policy 2004; 69: 229–238.
21. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 2012; Early View 19 July.
22. The Royal Society. Public understanding of science. London: The Royal Society, 1985.
23. Brown P and Zavestoski S. Social movements in health: an introduction. Soc Health Illness 2004; 26: 679–694.
24. Irwin A. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge, 1995. 25. Governance arrangements for research ethics committees: a harmonised edition [press release], https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213753/dh_133993.pdf (2011, accessed September 2014).
25. Caron-Flinterman FJ, Broerse JEW and Bunders JFG. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 2575–2584.
26. Oliver S, Armes DG and Gyte G. Public involvement influences a national research agenda. Patient 2009; 2: 179–190.
27. Harvey M. Drama, talk, and emotion: omitted aspects of public participation. Sci Technol Human Values 2009; 34: 139–161.
28. Davies C, Whetherall M and Barnett E. Citizens at the centre: deliberative participation in health care decisions. Bristol: Policy Press, 2006.
29. Liabo K. Service user involvement in research: collaborating on a systematic review with young people who have experience of being in care. PhD Thesis, London: Institute of Education, University of London, 2013.
30. de Wit MPT, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, et al. European League against rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patent representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 722–726.
31. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27: 391–399.
32. Stewart R, Caird J, Oliver K, et al. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. Health Expect 2011; 14: 439–448.\