A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 21-33

  Hubbard, Gill ^a   Kidd, Lisa ^a   Donaghy, Edward ^a   McDonald, Charlotte ^a   Kearney, Nora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Community based research and or services; Decision making; Involvement; Self care

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RARE DISEASE; REVIEW; SELF CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BENCHMARKING; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PLANNING; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 37849185500     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Department of Health. Strengthening accountability. Involving patients and the public. Policy guidance-section 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001. London; 2003. pp. 1-16.
2. Department of Health. Health and Social Care Act (2001). London: HMSO; 2001.
3. Department of Health. NHS Reform and Health Care Professionals Act (2002). London: HMSO; 2001.
4. Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century; 2002.
5. Department of Health. Self care - a real choice. Self care support - a practical option. London; 2005.
6. Scottish Executive. Cancer in Scotland: Action for Change. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Health Department; 2001.
7. Scottish Executive. Patient Focus and Public Involvement. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Health Department; 2003.
8. National Institute for Health. http://www.nih.gov/about. Internet 2006; 2005.
9. United States Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/oashi/patrep/pindex.html. Internet 2006; 2005.
10. Health Canada. http://wwww.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/public-consult/index_e.html. Internet 2006; 2005.
11. Department of Health and Ageing. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/content/health-pg- consumer-index.htm. Internet 2006; 2005.
12. National Health and Medical Research Council. http://www.7.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/files/r33.pdf. Internet 2006; 2005.
13. Dixon-Woods M, Kirk D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur T, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton A. Vulnerable groups and access, to health care: a critical interpretive review. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R and D (NCCSDO); 2005.
14. Noblit G., and Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies (1988), Sage, Newbury Park
15. Miles M., and Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (1994), Sage, London
16. Baum M. Who truly represents the needs of the consumer diagnosed with breast cancer? Who are these patients' advocates? How are they informed? What, if any, are their secret agendas?. Eur J Cancer 33 (1997) 807-808
17. Baum M., Buchanan M., Baselga J., Cataliotti L., Jassem J., and Piccart M. The future of breast cancer research in danger. Eur J Cancer 38 (2002) 2210-2213
18. Davis C., Salo L., and Redman S. Evaluating the effectiveness of advocacy training for breast cancer advocates in Australia. Eur J Cancer Care 10 (2001) 82-86
19. Hinestrosa M.C., and Fuentes A. Consumer advocacy. Latina leadership: putting together a national advocacy network. MAMM: Women Cancer Comm 3 (2001) 26
20. Lymphoma Today Advocacy 101: demystifying the world of advocacy. Lymph Today 2 (2003) 10
21. McNeil C. Cancer advocacy evolves as it gains seats on research panels. J Natl Cancer Inst 93 (2001) 257-259
22. Norton L. Breast cancer advocates in clinical research: a trialist's perspective. Breast Dis 10 (1998) 51-59
23. Redmond K. Collaboration with patient advocates: unleashing a potent force. Brit J Urol Int 91 (2003) 590-591
24. Steimle S. Germany needs advocacy, centres, interdisciplinary approach, experts say. J Natl Cancer Inst 90 (1998) 1124
25. Zakarian B. Toward a new agenda for advocacy. Cancer Invest 16 (1998) 203-210
26. Zebrack B. An advocate's perspective on cancer survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs 17 (2001) 284-287
27. Baum M., and Thornton H. Women's advocacy groups and research in breast cancer. Breast 10 (2001) 19-22
28. Hunt J., Stevens T., Mitchell N., Wilde D., and Ahmedzai S. How cancer service users can influence research and practice. Nurs Times 98 (2002) 32-33
29. NCRI, NCRN. NCRI/NCRN Think-Tank on Consumer Involvement in Cancer Research; 2002.
30. NCRI-National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI). Consumer bursary; 2004.
31. NTCRN CRP (The North Trent Cancer Research Network Consumer Research Panel). Patient and public involvement; 2004.
32. Oliver J.W., Kravitz R.L., Kaplan S.H., and Meyers F.J. Individualized patient education and coaching to improve pain control among cancer outpatients. J Clin Oncol 19 (2001) 2206-2212
33. Stevens T., Wilde D., Hunt J., and Ahmedzai S.H. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expect 6 (2003) 81-88
34. Stevens T., and Oliver A. Development and evaluation of a collaborative model for consumer research panels in cancer research networks. Proceedings of the Involve Conference. November 11 (2004)
35. Thornton H. Patient perspectives on involvement in cancer research in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care 11 (2002) 205-209
36. Davenport-Ennis N., Cover M., Ades T.B., and Stovall E. An analysis of advocacy: a collaborative essay. Semi Oncol Nurs 18 (2002) 290-296
37. Lancet. How consumers can and should improve clinical trials. Lancet 357 (2001) 1721
38. Langer A.S. The role of advocacy in cancer research: not a monster. Cancer Invest 15 (1997) 500-502
39. McCormick S., Brody J., Brown P., and Polk R. Public involvement in breast cancer research: an analysis and model for future research. Int J Health Serv 34 (2004) 625-646
40. PAC Patient advocacy committee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (2001) 120-121
41. Platner J.H., Bennett L.M., Millikan R., and Barker M.D. The partnership between breast cancer advocates and scientists. Environ Mol Mutagen 39 (2002) 102-107
42. Vanchieri C. Patient advocates help researchers avoid "bumps in the road". J Natl Cancer Inst 90 (1998) 1193-1195
43. Gray R.E., Fitch M., Davis C., and Phillips C. Challenges of participatory research: reflections on a study with breast cancer self-help groups. Health Expect 3 (2000) 243-252
44. Parboosingh J., Stachenko S., and Inhaber S. A model of consumer participation: The Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative. Can J Aging 16 (1997) 177-186
45. Bourke L. Participatory research in breast cancer: a case study in regional Victoria. Contemp Nurse 12 (2002) 246-252
46. Hassey Dow K., Ferrell B.R., Leigh S., and Melancon C.H. The cancer survivor as co-investigator. The benefits of collaborative research with advocacy groups. Cancer Pract 5 (1997) 255-257
47. Plummer P., Jackson S., Konarski J., Mahanna E., Dunmore C., Regan G., Mattingly D., Parker B., Williams S., Andrews C., Vannapppagari V., Hall S., Deming S., Hodgson E., Moorman P., Newman B., and Millikan R. Making epidemiologic studies responsive to the needs of participants and communities: the Carolina Breast Cancer Study experience. Environ Mol Mutagen 39 (2002) 96-101
48. Psillidis L., Flach J., and Padberg R.M. Participants strengthen clinical trial research: the vital role of participant advisors in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. J Womens Health 6 (1997) 227-232
49. Bradburn J., Maher J., Adewuyi-Dalton R., Grunfeld E., Lancaster T., and Mant D. Developing clinical trials protocols: the use of patient focus groups. Psycho Oncol 4 (1995) 107-112
50. Andejeski Y., Breslau E.S., Hart E., Lythcott N., Alexander L., Rich I., Bisceglio I., Smith H.S., and Visco F.M. Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11 (2002) 119-136
51. Andejeski Y., and Bisceglio I. Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11 (2002) 379-388
52. Burhansstipanov L., Gilbert A., LaMarca K., and Krebs L.U. An innovative path to improving cancer care in Indian country. Public Health Rep 116 (2001) 424-433
53. Chen A.M., Wismer B.A., Lew R., Kang S.H., Min K., Moskowitz J.M., and Tager I.B. 'Health is strength': a research collaboration involving Korean Americans in Alameda County. Am J Prev Med 13 (1997) 93-100
54. Fouad M.N., Partridge E., Wynn T., Green B.L., Kohler C., and Nagy S. Statewide Tuskegee Alliance for clinical trials. A community coalition to enhance minority participation in medical research. Cancer 91 (2001) 237-241
55. Kim Y.H., and Sarna L. An intervention to increase mammography use by Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum 31 (2004) 105-110
56. Smith A., Christopher S., and McCormick A.K.H.G. Development and implementation of a culturally sensitive cervical health survey: a community-based participatory approach. Women Health 40 (2004) 67-86
57. Plumb M. Funding community-based participatory research. J Interprof Care 18 (2004) 428-439
58. Matsunaga D.S., Enos R., Gotay C.C., Banner R.O., DeCambra H., Hammond O.W., Hedlund N., Ilaban E.K., Issell B.F., and Tsark J.A. Participatory research in a native Hawaiian community: The Wai'anae Cancer Research Project. Cancer 78 (1996) 1582-1586
59. Marsden J., Bradburn J., and Consumers' Advisory Group for Clinical Trials. Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre: patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expect 7 (2004) 6-17
60. National Cancer Institute (NCRI), Consumer Liason Group (CLG). Annual Report of the NCRI Consumer Liaison Group. Leeds: NCRN; 2004.
61. Thornton H. Focus: consumers' advisory group for clinical trials. Brit Oncol Assoc News 2 (1999) 3
62. Tritter J, Daykin N, Evans S, Sanidas M. Improving cancer services through patient involvement; 2004.
63. Spencer J. Turning the tables: when a cancer patient contributes to staff training. Prof Nurse 18 (2003) 10
64. Bullivent D., and Reeve J. Consulting consumers. Back to basics. Health Serv J 106 (1996) 28-29
65. Cushen N., South J., and Kruppa S. Patients as teachers: the patient's role in improving cancer services. Prof Nurse 19 (2004) 395-399
66. Williams R. Cancer. How was it for you?. Health Serv J 110 (2000) 28-29
67. Coe N., Barnes M., and Purvis J. A method for involving users in the accreditation of cancer services. Clin Gov Bull 1 (2000) 4-6
68. Hughes V. Patient involvement: turning the rhetoric into reality. J Integrat Care Path 6 (2002) 3-8
69. Birchall M., Richardson A., and Le L. Eliciting views of patients with head and neck cancer and carers on professionally derived standards of care. Brit Med J 324 (2002) 516-519
70. Richardson A., Lee L., and Birchall M. Learning from patients with cancer and their spouses: a focus group study. J Laryngol Otol 116 (2002) 1028-1035
71. Richards S. Promoting more accessible cancer care services. Brit J Health Care Manage 10 (2004) 182-184
72. Centre for Change and Innovation. Cancer Service Improvement Programme-involvement of patients and their families; 2004.
73. Thornton H., and Baum M. Should a mammographic screening programme carry the warning: screening can damage your health!?. Brit J Cancer 79 (1999) 691-692
74. Cooper D. Patient and public involvement in managed clinical networks for cancer services; 2004.
75. Gambrill J. Improving patients' experience of cancer services. Comm Health UK Action 57 (2002) 13
76. Modernisation Agency. Working to improve the patient/carer experience across cancer services. A service improvement guide (2002), Department of Health, London
77. Moody R. Overcoming barriers to delivering information to cancer patients. Brit J Nurs 12 (2003) 1281-1287
78. North of Scotland Cancer Network (NOSCAN). Patient, carer and public involvement induction pack (2004), NOSCAN
79. Roy Castle Lung Cancer Patient Network. Newsletter; 2004.
80. Sitzia J., and Cotterell P. Formative evaluation of the cancer partnership project-final report (2004), Department of Health and Macmillan Cancer Care Relief, London
81. Gallini A. The experience of patients and carers involved in a cancer network patient forum (2004), University of Southampton, Southampton pp. 1-87
82. Gott M., Stevens T., Small N., and Ahmedzai S.H. User involvement in cancer care: exclusion and empowerment (2000), Policy Press, Bristol
83. Langton H., Barnes M., Haslehurst S., Rimmer J., and Turton P. Collaboration, user involvement and education: a systematic review of the literature and report of an educational initiative. Eur J Oncol Nurs 7 (2003) 242-252
84. Flanagan J. Public participation in the design of educational programmes for cancer nurses: a case report. Eur J Cancer Care 8 (1999) 107-112
85. Macmillan Cancer Relief. User support and involvement guidelines. The full guide to involving people affected by cancer in all Macmillan's work; 2004. pp. 1-28.
86. Gott M. Involving users, improving services: the example of cancer. Brit J Clin Govern 7 (2002) 81-85
87. Tritter J.Q., Barley V., Daykin N., Evans S., McNeill J., Rimmer J., Sanidas M., and Turton P. Divided care and the third way: user involvement in statutory and voluntary sector cancer services. Sociol Health Illn 25 (2003) 429-456
88. Klein S., Tracy D., Kitchener H.C., and Walker L.G. The effects of the participation of patients with cancer in teaching communication skills to medical undergraduates: a randomised study with follow-up after 2 years. Eur J Cancer 36 (1999) 273-281
89. Patient Involvement Unit at NICE. PIU Newsletter; 2004.
90. Braden C.J., Mishel M.H., and Longman A.J. Self-help intervention project. Women receiving breast cancer treatment. Cancer Pract 6 (1998) 87-98
91. Craddock R.B., Adams P.F., Usui W.M., and Mitchell L. An intervention to increase use and effectiveness of self-care measures for breast cancer chemotherapy patients. Cancer Nurs 22 (1999) 312-319
92. Dodd M.J., and Miaskowski C. The PRO-SELF Program: a self-care intervention program for patients receiving cancer treatment. Semin Oncol Nurs 16 (2003) 300-308
93. Given C., Given B., Rahbar M., Jeon S., McCorkle R., Cimprich B., Galecki A., Kozachik S., Brady A., Fisher-Malloy M.J., Courtney K., and Bowie E. Effect of a cognitive behavioral intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 507-516
94. Golant M., Altman T., and Martin C. Managing cancer side effects to improve quality of life: a cancer psychoeducation program. Cancer Nurs 26 (2003) 37-44
95. Grant M., Golant M., Rivera L., Dean G., and Benjamin H. Developing a community program on cancer pain and fatigue. Cancer Pract 8 (2000) 87-94
96. Hagopian G.A. The effects of informational audiotapes on knowledge and self-care behaviors of patients undergoing radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 23 (1996) 697-700
97. Haisfield-Wolfe M.E., and Rund C. The development and pilot testing of a teaching booklet for oncology patients' self-assessment and perineal skin care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 29 (2002) 88-92
98. Hinds P.S., Quargnenti A., Bush A.J., Pratt C., Fairclough D., Rissmiller G., Betcher D., and Gilchrist G.S. An evaluation of the impact of a self-care coping intervention on psychological and clinical outcomes in adolescents with newly diagnosed cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 4 (2000) 6-17
99. Larson P.J., Dodd M.J., and Aksamit I. A symptom-management program for patients undergoing cancer treatment: the Pro-Self Program. J Cancer Educat 13 (1998) 248-252
100. Larson P.J., Miaskowski C., MacPhail L., Dodd M.J., Greenspan D., Dibble S.L., Paul S.M., and Ignoffo R. The PRO-SELF Mouth Aware program: an effective approach for reducing chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Cancer Nurs 21 (1998) 263-268
101. McDaniel R.W., and Rhodes V.A. Development of a preparatory sensory information videotape for women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 21 (1998) 43-48
102. McLane L., Jones K., Lydiatt W., Lydiatt D., and Richards A. Taking away the fear: a grounded theory study of cooperative care in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Psycho Oncol 12 (2003) 474-490
103. Miaskowski C., Dodd M., West C., Schumacher K., Paul S.M., Tripathy D., and Koo P. Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 1713-1720
104. Reuille K.M. Using self-regulation theory to develop an intervention for cancer-related fatigue. Clin Nurse Spec 16 (2002) 312-321
105. West C.M., Dodd M.J., Paul S.M., Schumacher K., Tripathy D., Koo P., and Miaskowski C. The PRO-SELF(c): Pain Control Program - an effective approach for cancer pain management. Oncol Nurs Forum 30 (2003) 65-73
106. Williams S.A., and Schreier A.M. The effect of education in managing side effects in women receiving chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum Online 31 (2004) E16-E23
107. Wydra E.W. The effectiveness of a self-care management interactive multimedia module. Oncol Nurs Forum 28 (2001) 1399-1407
108. Yates P., Edwards H., Nash R., Aranda S., Purdie D., Najman J., Skerman H., and Walsh A. A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-administered educational intervention for improving cancer pain management in ambulatory settings. Patient Educ Couns 53 (2004) 227-237
109. Barry B., and Henderson A. Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient. Cancer Nurs 19 (1996) 384-391
110. Beaver K., Luker K.A., Owens R.G., Leinster S.J., Degner L.F., and Sloan J.A. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 19 (1996) 8-19
111. Beaver K., Bogg J., and Luker K.A. Decision-making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer. Health Expect 2 (1999) 266-276
112. Beaver K., Luker K.A., Jones D., Susnerwala S., Campbell M., Craven O., Tomlinson M., and Witham G. Colorectal cancer: decision-making preferences and proffered choice (2003), University of Manchester
113. Beisecker A.E., Helmig I., Graham D., and Moore W.P. Attitudes of oncologists, oncology nurses and patients from a women's clinic regarding medical decision making with older and younger breast cancer patients. Gerontologist 34 (1994) 505-512
114. Boyd A, Higgins J. Management and organisation of cancer treatment services. Report of an expert conference Madrid. Manchester: The Manchester Centre for Healthcare Management; December 15, 2003. pp. 1-14.
115. Bruera E., Sweeney C., Calder K., Palmer L., and Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 19 (2001) 2883-2885
116. Bruera E., Willey J.S., Palmer J.L., and Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94 (2002) 2076-2080
117. Butow P.N., Maclean M., Dunn S.M., Tattersall M.H., and Boyer M.J. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8 (1997) 857-863
118. Charles C., Redko C., Whelan T., Gafni A., and Reyno L. Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer. Sociol Health Illn 20 (1998) 71-95
119. Davison B.J., Degner L.F., and Morgan T.R. Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Froum 22 (1995) 1401-1408
120. Davison B.J., Kirk P., Lesley F., Degner L., and Hassard T.H. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educat Couns 37 (1999) 255-263
121. Davison B.J., Gleave M.E., Goldenberg S.L., Degner L.F., Hoffart D., and Berkowitz J. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 25 (2002) 42-49
122. Davison B.J., Parker P.A., and Goldenberg S.L. Patients' preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. Brit J Urol Int 93 (2004) 47-51
123. Degner L., Kristjanson L.J., Bowman S., Sloan J.A., Carriere K.C., O'Neil J., Bilodeau B., Watson P., and Mueller B. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. J Am Med 277 (1997) 1485-1492
124. Dunsmore J., and Quine S. Information, support, and decision-making needs and preferences of adolescents with cancer: implications for health professionals. J Psychosoc Oncol 13 (1995) 39-56
125. Fallowfield L. Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer. Patient Educat Couns 30 (1997) 209-214
126. Fielding R., and Hung J. Preferences for information and involvement in decisions during cancer care among a Hong Kong Chinese population. Psycho Oncol 5 (1996) 321-329
127. Gagnon E.M., and Recklitis C.J. Parents' decision-making preferences in pediatric oncology: the relationship to health care involvement and complementary therapy use. Psycho Oncol 12 (2003) 442-452
128. Ganz P.A. Understanding patient preferences for involvement in care. Eur J Cancer 33 (1997) 1169-1170
129. Gattellari M., Butow P.N., and Tattersall M.H.N. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 52 (2001) 1865-1878
130. Hack T.F., Degner L.F., and Dyck D.G. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 39 (1994) 279-289
131. Helmes A., Bowen D., and Bengel J. Patient preferences of decision-making in the context of genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Genet Med 4 (2002) 150-157
132. Heyland D.K., Tranmer J., O'Callaghan C.J., and Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making?. J Crit Care 18 (2003) 3-10
133. Janz N.K., Wren P.A., Copeland L.A., Lowery J.C., Goldfarb S.L., and Wilkins E.G. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 3091-3096
134. Johnson J.D., Roberts C.S., Cox C.E., Reintgen D.S., Levine J.S., and Parsons M. Breast cancer patients' personality style, age, and treatment decision making. J Surg Oncol 63 (1996) 183-186
135. Keating N.L., Guadagnoli E., Landrum M.B., Borbas C., and Weeks J.C. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: Should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement?. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 1473-1479
136. Kraetschmer N., Sharpe N., Urowitz S., and Deber R.B. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?. Health Expect 7 (2004) 317-326
137. Lam W., Fielding R., Chan M., Chow L., and Ho E. Participation and satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making in breast cancer among Chinese women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 80 (2003) 171-180
138. Llewellyn-Thomas H., McGreal M., and Thiel E. Cancer patients' decision-making and trial entry preferences: the effects of 'framing' information about short-term toxicity and long-term survival. Med Decis Making 15 (1995) 4-12
139. Lobb E.A., Kenny D.T., Butow P.N., and Tattersall M.H.N. Women's early preferences for discussion of prognosis in early breast cancer. Health Expect 4 (2001) 48-57
140. Ng L.F., Shumacher A., and Goh C.B. Autonomy for whom? A perspective from the Orient. Palliat Med 14 (2000) 163-164
141. Petrisek A.C., Laliberte L.L., Allen S.M., and Mor V. The treatment decision-making process: age differences in a sample of women recently diagnosed with nonrecurrent, early-stage breast cancer. Gerontologist 37 (1997) 598-608
142. Redmond K. Assessing patients' needs and preferences in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Brit J Cancer 77 (1998) 5-7
143. Rothenbacher D., Lutz M.P., and Porzsolt F. Treatment decisions in palliative cancer care: patients' preferences for involvement and doctors' knowledge about it. Eur J Cancer 33 (1997) 1184-1189
144. Steginga S.K., and Occhipinti S. The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer. Med Decis Making 24 (2004) 573-583
145. Stiggelbout A.M., and Kiebert G.M. A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. Can Med Assoc J 157 (1997) 383-389
146. Wallberg B., Michelson H., Nystedt M., Bolund C., Degner L.F., and Wilking N. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 39 (2000) 467-476
147. Wong F., Stewart D.E., Dancey J., Meana M., McAndrews M.-P., Bunston T., and Cheung A.M. Men with prostate cancer: influence of psychological factors on informational needs and decision making. J Psychosom Res 49 (2000) 13-19
148. Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care. Brit J Cancer 89 (2003) S15-S16
149. Pinquart M., and Duberstein P.R. Information needs and decision-making processes in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 51 (2004) 69-80
150. Benor D.E., Delbar V., and Krulik T. Measuring impact of nursing intervention on cancer patients' ability to control symptoms. Cancer Nurs 21 (1998) 320-334
151. Ream E., Richardson A., and Alexander-Dann C. Facilitating patients' coping with fatigue during chemotherapy-pilot outcomes. Cancer Nurs 25 (2002) 300-308
152. Johnston P., and Boyd R. Patient involvement in clinical trials of potential cancer therapeutics. Good Clin Pract J (2001) 831-833
153. Thornton H. The voice of the breast cancer patient - a lonely cry in the wilderness. Eur J Cancer 36 (1997) 825-828
154. Calman K, Hine D. A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. A report by the expert advisory group on cancer to the chief medical officers of England and Wales. London: Department of Health; 1995.
155. Tritter J., Daykin N., Evans S., and Sanidas M. Improving cancer services through patient involvement (2004), Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon