European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 722-726

  De Wit, M P T ^a   Berlo, S E ^b   Aanerud, G J ^c   Aletaha, D ^d   Bijlsma, J W ^b   Croucher, L ^e   Da Silva, J A P ^f   Glusing B ^g   Gossec, L ^h   Hewlett, S ⁱ   Jongkees, M ^j   Magnusson, D ^k   Scholte Voshaar, M ^l   Richards, P ^m   Ziegler, C ⁿ   Abma, T A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e Arthritis Research UK   (United Kingdom)

^f CENTRO HOSPITALAR E UNIVERSITÁRIO DE COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^g EULAR Secretariat   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^j EULAR Task Force   (Netherlands)

^k Reumatikerforbundet   (Sweden)

^l Dutch League of Arthritis Patient Associations   (Netherlands)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ Danish Network of Patient Research Partners   (Denmark)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EUROPE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHEUMATIC DISEASE; RHEUMATOLOGY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EUROPE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 79953301130     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: 14682060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.135129     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037-40. (Pubitemid 30339242)
2. Nicklin J, Cramp F, Kirwan J, et al. Collaboration with patients in the design of patient reported outcome measures: capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62:1552-8.
3. Oliver S, Gray J, et al. A Bibliography of Research Reports about Patients', Clinicians' and Researchers' Priorities for New Research. London: James Lind Alliance, 2006.
4. Abma TA, Molewijk B, Widdershoven GA. Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Anal 2009;17:217-35.
5. Kjeken I, Ziegler C, Skrolsvik J, et al. How to develop patient-centered research: some perspectives based on surveys among people with rheumatic diseases in Scandinavia. Phys Ther 2010;90:450-60.
6. O'Connell D, Mosconi P. An active role for patients in clinical research. Drug Dev Res 2006;67:188-92. (Pubitemid 44099978)
7. Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect 2005;8:352-9. (Pubitemid 41641185)
8. Schipper K, Abma T, van Zadelhoff E, et al. What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qual Inq 2010;16:10.
9. Abma TA, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GA. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res 2009;19:401-15.
10. Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, et al. Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003;30:868-72. (Pubitemid 36402790)
11. Kirwan JR, Ahlmén M, de Wit M, et al. Progress since OMERACT 6 on including patient perspective in rheumatoid arthritis outcome assessment. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2246-9. (Pubitemid 41587876)
12. Gossec L, Dougados M, Rincheval N, et al. Elaboration of the preliminary Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score:a EULAR initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1680-5.
13. Thornton H. Patients and health professionals working together to improve clinical research:where are we going? Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2454-8. (Pubitemid 44442938)
14. Dougados M, Betteridge N, Burmester GR, et al. EULAR standardised operating procedures for the elaboration, evaluation, dissemination, and implementation of recommendations endorsed by the EULAR standing committees. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1172-6.
15. SurveyMonkey. SurveyMonkey software. http://www.surveymonkey.com (accessed 2009)
16. Speight J, Barendse SM. FDA guidance on patient reported outcomes. BMJ 2010;340:c2921.
17. Rowen D, Carlton J, Brazier JE, et al. FDA on PROMs. Two important points. BMJ 2010;341:c5454.
18. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med 2005;60:2575-84.
19. Haaster H, Koster-Dreese Y,. eds. Ervaren en weten-essays over de relatie tussen ervaringskennis en onderzoek. Utrecht:Jan van Arkel, 2005.
20. Caron-Flinterman JF, et al. New Voice in Science: Patient Participation in Decision-Making on Biomedical Research (Dissertation). Amsterdam:Free University of Amsterdam, 2005.
21. Abma TA, Broerse JE. Patient participation as dialogue:setting research agendas. Health Expect 2010;13:160-73.
22. Hewlett S, Wit M, Richards P, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:676-80. (Pubitemid 44289891)
23. Abma TA. Patient participation in health research:research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1310-28. (Pubitemid 41824777)
24. Broerse J, van der Ham L, van Veen S, et al. Inventarisatie patientenparticipatie bij richtlijnontwikkeling [Internal desk study:Inventory patient participation in guideline development. In Dutch]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Athena Institute, VU Amsterdam, 2010.
25. van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines:practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Qual Health Care 2001;10:10-16.
26. Schipper K, Abma TA, Hené RJ, et al. Polycystic kidney disease. BMJ 2009;338:b1595.
27. Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Mielants H, et al. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis:the patient version. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1381-6.
28. van der Goes MC, Jacobs JW, Boers M, et al. Patients' and rheumatologists' perspectives on glucocorticoids:an exercise to improve the implementation of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1015-21.
29. Lanza ML, Ericsson A. Consumer contributions in developing clinical practice guidelines. J Nurs Care Qual 2000;14:33-40.
30. Richards P, de Wit M. OMERACT Glossary. http://reuma.rediris.es/omeract/ docs/OMERACT-Glossary.htm (accessed 24 March 2010).
31. Liberati A. Consumer participation in research and health care. BMJ 1997;315:499. (Pubitemid 27359098)
32. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment:a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010;26:334-40.
33. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts. http://www.icmje.org (accessed 24 March 2009).
34. Bastian H. Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8:485-90. (Pubitemid 126484854)
35. Involve. People & Participation: How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision-Making. London:Beacon Press, 2005.
36. Staley K. Summary Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: Involve, 2009.