Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 545-558

  Roberts, Douglas A ^a   Bybee, Rodger W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927511768     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203097267     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Agin, M. L. (1974). Education for scientific literacy: A conceptual frame of reference and some applications. Science Education 58, 403-415.
2. Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS science teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 47-59). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.
5. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
7. Bybee, R., & MacRae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 7-26.
8. Clark, J., Case, J. M., Davies, N., Sheridan, G., & Toerien, R. (2011). "Struggling up Mount Improbable": A cautionary (implementation) tale of a Vision II scientific literacy curriculum in South Africa. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 272-287). New York: Routledge.
9. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum for use by curriculum developers. Toronto, ON: Author. ISBN 0-88987-111-6.
10. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
12. Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95, 168-185. doi: 10. 1002/sce. 20414.
13. Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
14. Fensham, P. J. (2012). The science curriculum; the decline of expertise and the rise of bureaucratise. Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi: 10. 1080/00220272. 2012. 737862.
15. Gabel, L. L. (1976). The development of a model to determine perceptions of scientific literacy. Doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
16. Gauthier, D. P. (1963). Practical reasoning: The structure and foundations of prudential and moral arguments and their exemplification in discourse. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
17. Harlen, W. (2001a). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education-past, present, and future (pp. 49-60). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Harlen, W. (2001b). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36, 79-104.
19. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16.
20. Jenkins, E. W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71 (256), 43-51.
21. Kelly, G. J. (2011). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 61-73). New York: Routledge.
22. Klopfer, L. E. (1969). Science education in 1991. The School Review, 77, 199-217.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Layton, D., Jenkins, E. W., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Nafferton, Driffield, East Yorkshire, UK: Studies in Education Ltd.
25. Linder, C., Östman, L, Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P.-O., Erickson, G., & MacKinnon, A. (Eds.). (2011). Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
26. Linder, C., Östman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (Eds.). (2007). Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
27. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
28. McEneaney, E. H. (2003). The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47 (2), 217-237.
29. Millar, R. (2006). Twenty First Century Science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (13), 1499-1521.
30. Millar, R. (2010). Increasing participation in science beyond GCSE: The impact of Twenty First Century Science. School Science Review, 91 (337), 67-73.
31. Millar, R. (2012). Rethinking science education: Meeting the challenge of "science for all." School Science Review, 93 (345), 21-30.
32. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London, School of Education. Retrieved from www. nuffieldfoundation. org/beyond-2000-science-education-future.
33. Miller, J. D. (2000). The development of civic scientific literacy in the United States. In D. D. Kumar & D. E. Chubin (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook for research and practice (pp. 21-47). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
34. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
35. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
36. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
37. OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD.
38. OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD.
39. OECD. (2006). The PISA 2006 assessment framework for science, reading and mathematics. Paris: OECD.
40. OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 draft science framework. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts.
41. Orpwood, G. (1998). The logic of advice and deliberation: Making sense of science curriculum talk. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54-70). New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Osborne, J. (2007a). Engaging young people with science: Thoughts about future direction of science education. In C. Linder, L. Östman, & P.-O. Wickman (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction (pp. 105-112). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
43. Osborne, J. (2007b). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 3 (3), 173-184.
44. Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208.
45. Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of "curriculum emphases" in science education. Science Education, 66, 243-260.
46. Roberts, D. A. (1995). Junior high school science transformed: Analysing a science curriculum policy change. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 493-504.
47. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy: The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 11-27). New York: Routledge.
49. Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
50. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56.
51. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263-291.
52. Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the classroom. New York: Palgrave.
53. Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
55. Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socioscientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education 45 (1), 1-42.
56. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 909-921.
57. Twenty-First Century Science. www. nuffieldfoundation. org/twenty-firstcentury-science.
58. Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). An inclusive view of scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 176-192). New York: Routledge.