The gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 474-480

  Walsh, Catharine M ^a   Ling, Simon C ^a   Mamula, Petar ^b   Lightdale, Jenifer R ^c   Walters, Thomas D ^a   Yu, Jeffrey J ^d   Carnahan, Heather ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

clinical competence; education medical graduate standards; educational measurement; endoscopy gastrointestinal education; endoscopy gastrointestinal standards; endoscopy pediatric

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DELPHI STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DISCRIMINATIVE VALIDITY; ENDOSCOPIST; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT TOOL; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; CHECKLIST; CHILD; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; NORTH AMERICA; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHECKLIST; CHILD; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ENDOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; NORTH AMERICA; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84927176314     PISSN: 02772116     EISSN: 15364801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000686     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Takahashi SG, Waddell A, Kennedy M, et al. Innovations, integration and implementation issues in competency-based education in postgraduate medical education. https://www.afmc.ca/pdf/fmec/19-Glover Takahashi-Competency-based Education.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed June 1, 2014.
2. Long DM. Competency-based residency training: the next advance in graduate medical education. Acad Med 2000;75:1178-83.
3. Leichtner AM, Gillis LA, Gupta S, et al. NASPGHAN guidelines for training in pediatric gastroenterology. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013;56 (suppl 1):S1-8.
4. Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:798-807.e5.
5. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of training in the subspecialty of gastroenterology. www.royalcollege.ca. Published 2011. Accessed June 1, 2014.
6. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in pediatric gastroenterology. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/2013-PR-FAQ-PIF/332-gastroenterology-peds-07012013.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed June 1, 2014.
7. Sidhu R, Grober E, Musselman L, et al. Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin? Surgery 2004;135:6-20.
8. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008;78:153-89.
9. Klasko SK, Cummings RV, Glazerman LR. Education resident data collection: do the numbers add up? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172 (4 pt 1):1312-6.
10. Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:355-66e1-2.
11. Van Der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1996;1:41-67.
12. Walsh CM, Ling SC, Walters TD, et al. Development of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy CompetencyAssessment Tool for Pediatric Colonoscopy (GiECATKIDS). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014;59:480-6.
13. Walsh CM. Assessment of competence in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2014;16:401.
14. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84:273-8.
15. Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, et al. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulationbased assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19:233-50.
16. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
17. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Reliability. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
18. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231-40.
19. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006; 119:166.e7-16.
20. Watkins M, Portney L. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2009.
21. Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ 2004;38:1006-12.
22. Wright JG, Feinstein AR. Improving the reliability of orthopaedic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:287-91.
23. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1525-9.
24. Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM. Measurement of the general competencies of the accreditation council for graduate medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2009;84:301-9.
25. Gingerich A, Regehr G, Eva KW. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Acad Med 2011;86 (10 suppl):S1-7.
26. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
27. Donato AA. Direct observation of residents: a model for an assessment system. Am J Med 2014;127:455-60.
28. Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, et al. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ 2011;45:560-9.
29. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2003;15:270-92.
30. Sedlack RE. The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:1125-331133.e1-3.
31. De Villiers MR, de Villiers PJT, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 2005;27:639-43.