A focus on both form and function in examining selection versus constraint

Form and Function in Developmental Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 121-131

  Laubichler, M Brakefield ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926996745     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576188.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Allen, C., Beldade, P., Zwaan, B. J., and Brakefield, P.M. (2008). Differences in the selection response of serially repeated color pattern characters: standing variation, development, and evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8, 94.
2. Arthur, W. (2001). Developmental drive: an important determinant of the direction of phenotypic evolution. Evol Dev 3, 271-8.
3. Beldade, P. and Brakefield, P.M. (2002). The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nat Rev Genet 3, 442-52.
4. Beldade, P., Brakefield, P.M., and Long, A.D. (2005). Generating phenotypic variation: prospects from ‘evo-devo’ research on Bicyclus anynana wing patterns. Evol Dev 7, 101-7.
5. Beldade, P., Koops, K., and Brakefield, P.M. (2002). Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416, 844-7.
6. Beldade, P., Koops, K., and Brakefield, P.M. (2003). Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 14262-7.
7. Blows, M.W. and Hoffmann, A.A. (2005). A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86, 1371-84.
8. Boulding, E.G. and Hay, T.K. (1993). Quantitative genetics of shell form of an intertidal snail: constraints on short-term response to selection. Evolution47, 576-92.
9. Brakefield, P. M. (1998). The evolution-development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns of Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity 80, 265-72.
10. Brakefield, P. M. (2006). Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol Evol 21, 362-8.
11. Brakefield, P.M. and Frankino, W.A. (2008). Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution. In D. W. Whitman and T.N. Ananthakrishnan (eds.), Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences. Plymouth: Science Publishers, Inc., pp.121-51.
12. Brakefield, P.M. and French, V. (2006). Evo-devo focus issue. Heredity 97, 137-8.
13. Brakefield, P. M. and Roskam, J. C. (2006). Exploring evolutionary constraints is a task for an integrative evolutionary biology. Am Nat 168, S4-S13.
14. Breuker, C.J. and Brakefield, P.M. (2002). Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc R Soc Lond B 269, 1233-9.
15. Brunetti, C.R., Selegue, J.E., Monteiro, A., French, V., Brakefield, P.M., and Carroll, S.B. (2001). The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr Biol 11, 1578-85.
16. Cain, A.J. (1977). Variation in the spire index of some coiled gastropod shells, and its evolutionary significance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277, 333-424.
17. Cain, A.J. (1981). Variation in shell shape and size of helicid snails in relation to other Pulmonates in faunas of the Palaeacrtic region. Malacologia 21, 149-76.
18. Cain, A.J. and Sheppard, P.M. (1954). Natural selection in Cepaea. Genetics 39, 89-116.
19. Carroll, S.B., Gates, J., Keys, D., Paddock, S.W., Panganiban, G.F., Selegue, J., and Williams, J.A. (1994). Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265, 109-14.
20. Carroll, S.B., Grenier, J.K., and Weatherbee, S.D. (2005). From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
21. Ciampaglio, C.N., Kemp, M., and McShea, D.W. (2001). Paleobiology 27, 695-715.
22. Cook, L.M. (1990). Differences in shell properties between morphs of Littoraria pallescens. Hydrobiologia 193, 217-21.
23. Cowie, R. H. (1995). Variation in species diversity and shell shape in Hawaiian land snails: in situ speciation and ecological relationships. Evolution 49, 1191-202.
24. Dawkins, R. (1989). The evolution of evolvability. In C. Langton (ed.), Artificial Life. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp.201-20.
25. Frankino, W.A., Zwaan, B.J., Stern, D.L., and Brakefield, P.M. (2005). Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307, 718-20.
26. Frankino, W.A., Zwaan, B.J., Stern, D.L., and Brakefield, P.M. (2007). Internal and external constraints in the evolution of allometries among morphological traits in a butterfly. Evolution 61(12), 2958-7.
27. French, V. and Brakefield, P.M. (1995). Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the focal signal. Dev Biol 168, 112-23.
28. Galant, R., Skeath, J.B., Paddock, S., Lewis, D.L., and Carroll, S.B. (1998). Expression of an achaete-scute homolog during butterfly scale development reveals the homology of insect scales and sensory bristles. Curr Biol8, 807-13.
29. Gittenberger, A. (2006). The evolutionary history of parasitic gastropods and their coral hosts in the Indo-Pacific. Ph.D. thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
30. Goodfriend, G. A. (1986). Variation in land snail shell form and size and its causes: a review. Syst Zool 35, 204-23.
31. Jablonski, D. (2005). Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: the intersection of ecology, development and macroevolution. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 304, 504-19.
32. Joron, M. and Brakefield, P. M. (2003). Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424, 191-4.
33. Joron, M., Jiggins, C.D., Papanicolaou, A., and McMillan, W.O. (2006). Heli-conius wing patterns: an evo-devo model for understanding phenotypic diversity. Heredity 97, 157-67.
34. Kauffmann, S. A. (1985). Self-organisation, selective adaptation, and its limits. In D.J. Depew and B.H. Weber (eds.), Evolution at a Crossroads. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 169-207.
35. Keys, D.N., Lewis, D.L., Selegue, J.E., Pearson, B.J., Goodrich, L.V., Johnson, R.L., Gates, J., Scott, M.P., and Carroll, S.B. (1999). Recruitment of a Hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283, 532-4.
36. Kirschner, M. and Gerhart, J. (1998). Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 8420-7.
37. Langlade, N.B., Feng, X., Dransfield, T., Copsey, L., Hanna, A.I., Thebaud, C., Bangham, A., Hudson, A., and Coen, E. (2005). Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 10221-6.
38. Maynard Smith, J., Burian, R., Kaufman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., and Wolpert, L. (1985). Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60, 265-87.
39. McClain, C. R. (2005). Bathymetric patterns of morphological disparity in deep-sea gastropods from the western North Atlantic Basin. Evolution 59,1492-9.
40. McClain, C.R., Johnson, N.A., and Rex, M.A. (2004). Morphological disparity as a biodiversity metric in lower bathyal and abyssal gastropod assemblages. Evolution 58, 338-48.
41. McGhee, G.R. (1999). Theoretical Morphology. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. McGhee, G.R. (2007). The Geometry of Evolution: Adaptive Landscapes and Theoretical Morphospaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P.M., and French, V. (1994). The evolutionary genetics and developmental basis of wing pattern variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 48, 1147-57.
44. Monteiro, A., Brakefield, P.M., and French, V. (1997). Butterfly eyespots: the genetics and development of the color rings. Evolution 51, 1207-16.
45. Nijhout, H.F. (1991). The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
46. Raup, D.M. (1966). Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. J Paleontol 40, 1178-90.
47. Raup, D.M. (1967). Geometric analysis of shell coiling: coiling in ammonoids. J Paleontol 41, 43-65.
48. Reed, R.D., and Serfas, M.S. (2004). Butterfly wing pattern evolution is associated with changes in a Notch/Distal-less temporal pattern formation process. Curr Biol 14, 1159-66.
49. Ridley, M. (2003). Evolution (third edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
50. Robertson, K.A. and Monteiro, A. (2005). Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proc R Soc Lond B 272, 1541-6.
51. Saenko, S. V., French, V., Brakefield, P. M., and Beldade, P. (2008). Conserved developmental processes and the formation of evolutionary novelties: examples from butterfly wings. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci363, 1549-55.
52. Schluter, D. (1996). Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50, 1766-74.
53. Stevens, M. (2005). The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera. Biological Reviews 80, 573-88.
54. Stone, J. R. (1996). Computer-simulated shell size and shape variation in the Caribbean land snail genus Cerion: a test of geometrical constraints. Evolution 50, 341-7.
55. Thompson, J.N. (2005). The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press.
56. Via, S. and Lande, R. (1985). Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39, 505-22.
57. Wagner, A. (2005). Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
58. Wagner, G. P. and Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50, 967-76.
59. Wagner, P.J. (1995). Testing evolutionary constraint hypotheses with early Paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 21, 248-72.
60. Wagner, P.J. and Erwin, D.H. (2006). Patterns of convergence in general shell form among Paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 32, 316-37.
61. Weatherbee, S.D., Nijhout, H.F., Halder, G., Galant, R., Selegue, J., and Carroll, S. B. (1999). Ultrabithorax function in butterfly wings and the evolution of insect wing patterns. Current Biology 9, 109-15.