Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility (Preimplantation genetic screening)

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 203-229

  Munné, Santiago ^a  

^a Reprogenetics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926969478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511581571.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (183)

1. Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M and Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:2634-43.
2. Alikanai M. Cytoplasmic fragmentation in human embryos in vitro: implications and the relevance of fragment removal. In Gardner D, Weissman A, Howies C and Shoham Z, eds. Textbook of AssistedReproductive Techniques, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives. London: Martin Dunitz, 2001; pp. 169-82.
3. Alikani M, Schimmel T and Willadsen SM. Cytoplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder. Molecular Human Reproduction 2005; 11: 335-44.
4. Aoki K, Furukawa T, Ogasawara M, Hori S and Kitamura K. Psychosocial factors in recurrent miscarriage. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavica 1998; 77: 572-3.
5. Baart E, Van Opstal D, Los FJ, Fauser BCJM and Martini E. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day-3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day-5. Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 685-93.
6. Bielanska M, Tan SL and Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in-vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 413-19.
7. Blake M, Garrisi J, Tomkin G and Cohen J. Sperm deposition site during ICSI affects fertilization and development. Fertility and Sterility 2000;73: 31-7.
8. Bricker L and Farquharson RG. Types of pregnancy loss in recurrent miscarriage: implications for research and clinical practice. Human Reproduction 2002; 17:1345-50.
9. Brigham SA, Colon C and Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 2868-71.
10. Burgoyne PS, Holland K and Stephens R. Incidence of numerical chromosome abnormalities in human pregnancy estimated from induced and spontaneous abortion data. Human Reproduction 1991; 6: 555-65.
11. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S and Barkai G. Karyotype ofthe abortuses in recurrent miscarriages. Fertility and Sterility 2001; 75: 678-82.
12. Carp HJA, Dirnfeld M, Dor J and Grudzinskas JG. ART in recurrent miscarriage: preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening or surrogacy? Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 1502-5.
13. Chatzimeletiou K, Morrison E, Panagiotidis Y et al. Comparison ofthe effects of zona drilling by non-contact infrared laser or acid Tyrode’s on the development of human biopsied embryos as revealed by blastomere viability, cytoskeletal analysis and molecular cytogenetics. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005; 11: 697-710.
14. Cieslak-Janzen J, Tur-Kaspa I, Ilkevitch Y, Bernal A, Morris R and Verlinsky Y. Multiple micromanipulations for preimplantation genetic diagnosis do not affect embryo development to the blastocyst stage. Fertility and Sterility 2006; 85: 1826-9.
15. Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H and Regan L. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Human Reproduction 1994; 9:1328-32.
16. Cohen J, Scott R, Alikani M et al. Ooplasmic transfer in mature human oocytes. Molecular Human Reproduction 1998; 4:269-80.
17. Cohen J, Wells D and Munne S. Removal of two cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests employed to enhance implantation rates. FertilityandSterility 2007; 87:496-503.
18. Cohen J and Grifo J. Multi center trial of preimplantation genetic screening reported in the New England Journal of Medicine: an in-depth look at the findings. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2007; 15: 365-6.
19. Colls P, Sandalinas M, Pagidas K and Munne S. PGS analysis for aneuploidy in a patient heterozygous for a polymorphism of chromosome 16 (16qh-). Prenatal Diagnosis 2004; 24: 741-4.
20. Colls P, Escudero T, Zheng X et al. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility through reanalysis of dubious signals. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88:53-61.
21. Coonen E, Dumoulin JCM, Ramackers FCS and Hopman AHN. Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. HumanReproduction 1994; 9: 533-7.
22. Coulam CB, Jeyendran RS, Fiddler M and Pergament E. Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2007;24:37-41.
23. Crosignani PC and Rubin BL. Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. tte recommendations of the ESHRE workshop on recurrent spontaneous miscarriages held in Anacapri on September 9-11, 1990. Human Reproduction 1991; 6: 609-10.
24. Dale B, Menezo Y, Cohen J et al. IntracellularpH regulation in the human oocyte. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 964-70.
25. Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G and Goldman B. Detection of chromosomal aberrations in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortions by comparative genome hybridization. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 805-9.
26. De Boer KA, Catt JW, Jansen RPS, Leigh D and McArthur S. Moving to blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and single embryo transfer at Sydney IVF. Fertility and Sterility 2004; 82:295-8.
27. De Braekeleer M and Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses. Human Reproduction 1990; 5: 519-28.
28. Delhanty JDA, Griffin DK, Handyside AH et al. Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). Human Molecular Genetics 1993; 2:1183-5.
29. Delhanty JDA, Harper JC, Ao A, Handyside AH and 223 Winston RML. Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients. Human Genetics 1997; 99: 755-60.
30. Donoso P, Platteau P, Papanikolaou EG, Staessen C, Van Steirteghem A and Devroey P. Does PGS for aneuploidy screening change the selection of embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia men? Human Reproduction 2006;21:2390-5.
31. Dozortsev DI and McGinnis KT. An improved fixation technique for fluorescence in-situ hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 2001; 76: 186-8.
32. Dumoulin JCM, Bras M, Coonen E, Dreesen J, Geraedts JPM and Evers JLH. Effect of Ca/Mg -free medium on the biopsy procedure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Human Reproduction 1998; 13:2880-3.
33. Eiben B, Goebel R, Hansen S, and Hammans W. Early amniocentesis. A cytogenetic evaluation of over 1500 cases. Prenatal Diagnosis 1994; 14: 497-501.
34. Elder K and Cohen J., eds. Human Preimplantation Embryo Selection. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2007.
35. Evsikov S, Cieslak MLT and Verlinsky Y. Effect of chromosomal translocations on the development of preimplantation human embryos in-vitro. Fertility and Sterility 2000; 74: 672-7.
36. Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A et al. Genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. HumanReproduction 2006a; 21: 2319-28.
37. Fragouli E, Wells D, Whalley KM, Mills JA, Faed MJ and Delhanty JD. Increased susceptibility to maternal aneuploidy demonstrated by comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human M-II oocytes and first polar bodies. Cytogenetics and Genome Research 2006b; 114: 30-8.
38. Fragouli E, Delhanty JD and Wells D. Single cell diagnosis using comparative genomic hybridization after preliminary DNA amplification still needs more tweaking: too many miscalls. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88:247-8.
39. Fretts RC, Schmittdiel J, Mclean FH et al. Increased maternal age and the risk of fetal death. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 333: 953-7.
40. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genome hybridization. Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. European Journal of Human Genetics 2001;9:539-47.
41. Fung J, Weier HUG, Goldberg JD and Pedersen RA. Multilocus genetic analysis of single interphase cells by spectral imaging. Human Genetics 2000;107: 615-22.
42. Gardner DK, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J and Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of 224 blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 3434-40.
43. Garrisi J, Cohen J, Ferry KM, Colls P, Garrisi MG and Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis effectively reduces idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss among patients with up to five previous miscarriages after natural conception. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88(Suppl. 1): S85.
44. Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A et al. Micro-dissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48-microns diode laser beam: efficacy and safety of the procedure. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 64: 604-11.
45. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP and Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 72: 837-44.
46. Gianaroli L, Magli MC and Ferraretti AP. The in-vivo and in-vitro efficiency and efficacy of PGS for aneuploidy. Molecular Cell Endocrinology 2001a; 183: S13-S18.
47. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Tabanelli C, Trombetta C and Boudjema E. The role of preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2001b; 4: 31-6.
48. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Fiorentino F, Baldi M and Ferraretti AP. Clinical value of preimplantiation genetic diagnosis. Placenta 2003; 24: S77-S83.
49. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP, Tabanelli C, Trengia V, Farfalli V and Cavallini G. The beneficial effects ofPGS for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2004; 10: 633-40.
50. Goddijn M, Joosten JHK, Knegt AC et al. Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage. Human Reproduction 2004; 19:1013-17.
51. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction 2008; 23,481-92.
52. Gordon JW and Talansky BE. Assisted fertilization by zona drilling: a mouse model for correction of oligospermia. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1986; 239: 347-54.
53. Gordon JW and Gang I. Use of zona drilling for safe and effective biopsy of murine oocytes and embryos. Biological Reproduction 1990; 42: 869-76.
54. Gualtieri R, Santella L and Dale B. Tight junctions and cavitation in the human pre-embryo. Molecular Reproduction Developments 1992; 32: 81-7.
55. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D et al. Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis. Human Reproduction 2004a; 19: 2859-68.
56. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Wells D, Benet J et al. Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies andmetaphase II oocytes. Human Reproduction 2004b; 19: 2118-25.
57. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RML and Handyside AH. Human preimplantation development in-vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. HumanReproduction 1990; 5: 708-14.
58. Harper JC, Coonen E, Ramaekers FCS et al. Identification of the sex of human preimplantation embryos in two hours using an improved spreading method and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) using directly-labelled probes. Human Reproduction 1994; 9:721-4.
59. Harper JC, Coonen E, Handyside AH, Winston RML, Hopman AHN and Delhanty JDA. Mosaicism of autosomes and sex chromosomes in morphologically normal, monospermic, preimplantation human embryos. Prenatal Diagnosis 1995; 15: 41-50.
60. Harper JC and Wells D. Recent advances and future developments in PGS. Prenatal Diagnosis 1999; 19: 1193-9.
61. Harper, JC, de Die-Smulders C, Goossens V et al. ESHRE PGS Consortium data collection VII: Cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005. Human Reproduction 2008; 23, 741-55.
62. Harper JC, Sermon K, Geraedts J et al. What next for Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS)? Human Reproduction 2008b; 23, 478-80.
63. Hill D. Aneuploidy screening of preimplantation embryos using comparative genomic hybridization versus fluorescence in-situ hybridization techniques. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80: 873-4.
64. Hill D and Li M. Embryo biopsy medium and PGS pregnancy rates. Clinical Embryology 2004; 7: 11-12.
65. Jacobs PA and Hassold TJ. Chromosome abnormalities: origin and etiology in abortions and live births. In Vogal F and Sperling K, eds. Human Genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987; pp. 233-44.
66. Jobanputra V, Sobrino A, Kinney A, Kline J and Warburton D. Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Human Reproduction 2002; 17:1166-70.
67. Joris H, De Vos A, Janssens R, Devroey P, Liebaers L and Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of the results of human embryo biopsy and outcome of PGS after zona drilling using acid Tyrode medium or laser. Human Reproduction 2003; 18:1896-902.
68. Kahraman S, Bahce M, Samli H et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:2003-7.
69. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992; 258: 818-21.
70. Kearns WG, Pen R, Benner A, Widra E and Leach R. Comprehensive genetic analyses using a modified whole genome amplification protocol and microarrays to identify genetic disorders and determine embryo implantation from single cells. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88(Suppl.1): S236-S237.
71. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y and Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age- related aneuploidies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002; 6: 54-9.
72. Kuliev A and Verlinsky Y. Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal disorders on reproductive outcome. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2007; 16: 9-10.
73. Kupka MS, Dorn C, Montag M et al. Previous miscarriages influence IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcome. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2004; 8: 349-57.
74. La Rochebrochard E and Hionneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multi-centre European study. Human Reproduction 2000; 17:1649-56.
75. Lathi RB, Westphal LM and Milki AA. Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 2007, 89: 353-7.
76. Li M, Marin De Ugarte C, Surrey M, Danzer H, De Cherney A and Hill DL. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertility and Sterility 2005; 84: 1395-400.
77. Lim CK, Jum JH, Min DM et al. Efficacy and clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH for couples of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations: the Korean experience. Prenatal Diagnosis 2004; 24: 556-61.
78. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D and Munne S. Impact of blastomere biopsy and cryopreservation techniques on human embryo viability. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 770-3.
79. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I and Trounson AO. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in-vitro. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 1781-6.
80. Magli MC, Gianaroli L and Ferrareti AP. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Molecular Cellular Endocrinology 2001a; 22(183 Suppl. 1): S29-34.
81. Magli MC, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Double locus analysis of chromosome 21 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis 2001b; 21: 1080-5.
82. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Toschi M, Esposito F and Fasolino MC. tte combination ofpolarbodyand embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 1163-9.
83. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferrareti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A and Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosome complement. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 87: 534-41.
84. Mansfield ES. Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Human Molecular Genetics 1993; 2:43-50.
85. Marquez C, Cohen J and Munne S. Chromosome identification on human oocytes and polar bodies by spectral karyotyping. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 1998; 81:254-8.
86. Marquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahçe M, Alikani M and Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2000; 1:17-27.
87. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Van Echten-arends J et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357:9-17.
88. McFadyen IR. Early fetal loss. In Rodeck C, ed. Fetal Medicine. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, 1989; pp. 26-43.
89. Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J and Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Human Reproduction 1993; 8:2185-91.
90. Munne S, Grifo J, Cohen J and Weier HUG. Chromosome abnormalities in arrested human preimplantation embryos: a multiple probe fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) study. American Journal of Human Genetics 1994; 55(1): 150-9.
91. Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J and Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertility and Sterility 1995a; 64: 382-91.
92. Munne S, Dailey T, Sultan KM, Grifo J and Cohen J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Human Reproduction 1995b; 10:1015-21.
93. Munne S and Weier U. Simultaneous enumeration of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in interphase cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 1996; 75:263-70.
94. Munne S, Magli C, Adler A et al. Treatment-related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 780-4.
95. Munne S, Marquez C, Magli C, Morton P and Morrison L. Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Molecular Human Reproduction 1998a; 4: 863-70.
96. Munne S, Morrison L, Fung J et al. Spontaneous abortions are reduced after pre-conception diagnosis of translocations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1998b; 15:290-6.
97. Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. HumanReproduction 1999; 14: 2191-9.
98. Munne S, Sepulveda S, Balmaceda J et al. Selection of the most common chromosome abnormalities in oocytes prior to ICSI. Prenatal Diagnosis 2000a; 20: 582-6.
99. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L and Cohen J. Outcome ofpreimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertility and Sterility 2000b; 73:1209-18.
100. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C and Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002; 4: 223-32.
101. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003; 7:91-7.
102. Munne S and Wells D. Questions concerning the suitability of comparative genome hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80:871-2.
103. Munne S, Bahçe M, Sandalinas M et al. Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2004a; 8:81-90.
104. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J and Warburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenatal Diagnosis 2004b; 24: 638-47.
105. Munne S, Chen S, Fischer J et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertility and Sterility 2005; 84: 331-5.
106. Munne S, Fischer J, Warner A, Chen S, Zouves C and Cohen J., referring centers PGD group. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multi-center study. Fertility and Sterility 2006 a; 85: 326-32.
107. Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2006b; 12:234-53.
108. Munne S, Ary J, Zouves C et al. Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young egg donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online2006c; 12: 340-6.
109. Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations. HumanReproduction 2006d; 21: 839-40.
110. Munne S, Serena C, Colls P et al. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2007a; 14: 628-34.
111. Munne S, Garrisi J, Barnes F, Werlin L, and Kaplan B. Reduced spontaneous abortion and increasedlive birth rate after PGS for advanced maternal age. Fertility and Sterility 2007b; 88 (Suppl. 1): S85-6.
112. Munne S, Steuerwald NM, Wells D, Bethea S, Nowak NJ and Cohen J. Comprehensive aneuploidy screening in single cells using microarray comparative genomic hybridization methods: implications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 2007c; 88 (Suppl. 1): S86.
113. Munne S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I et al. Sub-standard application of PGS may interfere with its clinical success. Fertility and Sterility 2007d; 88: 781-4.
114. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA et al. Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age- related decline in female fertility. Lancet 1991; 337: 1375-7.
115. Nikas G, Ao A, Winston RML et al. Compaction and surface polarity in the human embryo in-vitro. Biological Reproduction 1996; 55: 32-7.
116. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 1708-12.
117. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S and Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertility and Sterility 2000; 73: 300-4.
118. Otani T, Roche M, Mizuikea M, Colls P, Escudero T and Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and failing to produce a live birth. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2006; 13: 879-94.
119. Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Rodrigo L et al. Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis on IVF outcome in implantation failure patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002; 6:232-7.
120. Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F et al. In-vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 71: 1033-9.
121. Pinkel D, Landegent J, Collins C, Fuscoe J, Segraves R, Lucas J and Gray J. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection oftrisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America 1988; 85: 9138-42.
122. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A et al. Comparison of the aneuploidy frequency in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction in obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermic men. Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 1570-4.
123. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I and Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertility and Sterility 2005; 83:393-7.
124. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88: 1497-504.
125. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Guidelines for good practice in PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2007; 16: 134-47.
126. Pujol A, Boiso I, Benet J, Veiga A, Durban M, Campillo M, Egozcue J and Navarro J. Analysis of nine chromosome probes in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes for the detection of aneuploidies. European Journal of Human Genetics 2003; 11: 325-36.
127. Quenby S, Vince G, Farquharson R and Aplin J. Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature’s quality control? Human Reproduction 2002; 17:1959-63.
128. Qumsiyeh MB, Kim KR, Ahmed MN and Bradford W. Cytogenetics and mechanisms of spontaneous abortions: increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation in chromosomally abnormal villi. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 2000; 88: 230-5.
129. Racowsky C, Combelles CMH, Nureddin A et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2003; 6: 323-31.
130. Reeve WJD. The distribution of ingested horseradish peroxidase in the 16-cell mouse embryo. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 1981; 66: 191-207.
131. Regan L, Braude PR and Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. British Medical Journal 1989; 299: 541-5.
132. Reis Soares S, Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Simon C, Remohi J and Pellicer A. High frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos obtained from oocyte donation cycles. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80: 656-7.
133. Roudebush W, Kim J and Minhas BS. The 8-cell pre-embryo is the ideal stage for biopsy in the mouse. Journal of In-Vitro Fertility and Embryo Transfer 1990; 7(4): 32.
134. Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. HumanReproduction 2003; 18:182-8.
135. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M, Calderon G, Cohen J and Munne S. Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Human Reproduction 2001; 16:1954-8.
136. Sandalinas M, Marquez M and Munne S. Spectral karyotyping of unfertilized and non-inseminated oocytes. Molecular Human Reproduction 2002; 8: 227 580-5.
137. Santalo J, Veiga A, Calafell JM et al. Evaluation of cytogenetic analysis for clinical preimplantation diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 64: 44-50.
138. Santalo J, Grossmann M and Egozcue J. Does Ca2+/Mg(2+)-free medium have an effect on the survival of the preimplantation mouse embryo after biopsy? Human Reproduction Update 1996; 2:257-61.
139. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M et al. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genome hybridization provides a highly reliable method for selecting “competent” embryos, markedly improving in-vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 87: 1033-40.
140. Sherlock J, Cirigliano V, Petrou M, Tutschek B and Adinolfi M. Assessment of diagnostic quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays performed on single cells. Annals of Human Genetics 1998; 62: 9-23.
141. Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from TESE. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 79: 30-8.
142. Simon C, Rubio C, Vidal F, Moreno C, Parrilla JJ and Pellicer A. Increased chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos after in-vitro fertilization in patients with recurrent miscarriages. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 1998; 10: 987-92.
143. Simpson JL. Incidence andtiming of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1990; 35:165-73.
144. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). (Available online at: www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0), 2005.
145. Spandorfer SD, Davis OK, Barmat LI, Chung PH and Rosenwaks Z. Relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy in in-vitro fertilization pregnancy loss. Fertility and Sterility 2004; 81: 1265-9.
146. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2004; 19:2849-58.
147. Stephenson MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertility and Sterility 1996; 66: 24-9.
148. Stephenson MD, Awartani KA and Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 446-51.
149. Stephenson MD and Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Human Reproduction 2006; 21:1076-82.
150. Stern JJ, Dorfman AD and Gutierrez-Najar MD. Frequency of abnormal karyotype among abortuses from women with and without a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Fertility and Sterility 1996; 65:250-3.
151. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sato T, Suzumori N and Suzumori K. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations. Fertility and Sterility 2004; 81: 367-73.
152. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Suzumori K. Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve success rates in recurrent aborters with translocations? Human Reprod 2004; 19: 2171-2
153. Taranissi M, El-Toukhy T, Gorgy A and Verlinsky Y. Influence of maternal age on the outcome of PGS for aneuploidy in patients with recurrent implantation failure. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005; 11: 628-32.
154. Tarkowski AK. An air drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966; 5: 394-400.
155. Treff NR, Su J, Mavrianos J, Bergh PA, Miller KA and Scott RT. Accurate 23 chromosome aneuploidy screening in human blastomeres using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88(Suppl. 1): S1.
156. Tur-Kaspa I. Optimizing ovarian stimulation and ET for IVF- PGS cycle. Post Graduate Course on PGS. 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Washington DC, October 13-17, 2007.
157. Twisk M, Haadsma ML, Van der Veen F et al. Preimplantation genetic screening as an alternative to prenatal testing for Down syndrome: preferences of women undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 88: 804-10.
158. Velilla E, Escudero T and Munne S. Blastomere fixation techniques and risk of misdiagnosis for PGS of aneuploidy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002; 4: 210-17.
159. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Friedine M et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Human Reproduction 1995; 10: 1923-7.
160. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Lifchez A, Strom C and Kuliev A., preimplantation genetic group. Birth of healthy children after preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by polar body fluorescent in-situ hybridization analysis. Fertility and Sterility 1996; 66: 126-9.
161. Verlinsky Y and Evsikov S. Karyotyping of human oocytes by chromosomal analysis of the second polar body. Molecular Human Reproduction 1999; 5: 89-95.
162. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak V, Ivakhnenko S et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in the first and second polar body. Molecular Cell Endocrinology 2001; 183: S47-S49.
163. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak V, Evsikov G, Galat V and Kuliev A. Nuclear transfer for full karyotyping and preimplantation diagnosis for translocations. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2002; 5: 300-5.
164. Verlinsky Y and Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies using fluorescence in-situ hybridization or comparative genomic hybridization. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80: 869-70.
165. Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor prognosis patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005; 11: 219-25.
166. Verlinsky Y and Kuliev A., eds. Atlas of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, 2nd edition. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005.
167. Vidal F, Gimenez C, Rubio C et al. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1998; 15: 310-13.
168. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H and Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genome hybridization. Prenatal Diagnosis 1999; 19: 846-51.
169. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R and Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Human Genetics 2000; 106:210-17.
170. Voullaire L, Collins V, Callaghan T, McBain J, Williamson R and Wilton L. High incidence of complex chromosome abnormality in cleavage embryos from patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertility and Sterility 2007; 87: 1053-8.
171. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z and Strobino B. Cytogenetic abnormalities in spontaneous abortions of recognized conceptions. In Porter IH, Willey A, eds. Perinatal Genetics: Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1986; pp. 133-48.
172. Weier HUG, Munne S, Lersch RA et al. Towards a full karyotype screening of interphase cells: “FISH and chip” technology. Molecular Cell Endocrinology 2001; 183: S41-S45.
173. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH and Delhanty DA. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genome hybridization. Nucleic Acid Research 1999; 27:1214-18.
174. Wells D and Delhanty JDA. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Molecular Human Reproduction 2000; 6: 1055-62.
175. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JDA and Munne S. First clinical application of comparative genome hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility 2002; 78: 543-9.
176. Werlin L, Rodi I, DeCherney A, Marello E, Hill D and Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80:467-8.
177. Willadsen S, Levron J, Munne S et al. Rapidvisualization of metaphase chromosomes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro matured bovine eggs. Human Reproduction 1999; 2:470-5.
178. Wilton LJ, Shaw JM and Trounson AO. Successful singlecell biopsy and cryopreservation of preimplantational mouse embryos. Fertility and Sterility 1989; 51: 513-17.
179. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D and Voullaire L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345:1537-41.
180. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, Williamson R and McBain J. Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80: 860-8.
181. Xu K, Huang T, Tiezheng L, Zhongmig S and Rosenwaks Z. Improve the fixation method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1998; 13: 570-4.
182. Yoon TK, Chung HM, Lim JM, Han SY, Ko JJ and Cha KY. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertility and Sterility 2000; 74:180-1.
183. Yoon TK, Lee DR, Cha KY, Chung HM, Lee WS and Cha KY. Survival rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 2007;88:952-6.