Polo-like kinase 1 inhibits DNA damage response during mitosis

Cell Cycle

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 219-231

  Benada, Jan ^a   Burdová, Kamila ^a   Lidak, Tomáš ^a   Von Morgen, Patrick ^a   Macurek, Libor ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

53BP1; DNA damage response; Mitosis; Phosphorylation; Polo like kinase 1

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; HISTONE H2A; POLO LIKE KINASE 1; PROTEIN 53BP1; UBIQUITIN LIGASE RNF168; UBIQUITIN LIGASE RNF8; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HISTONE; ONCOPROTEIN; POLO-LIKE KINASE 1; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; TP53BP1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CELL PROTECTION; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSOL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA REPAIR; GENOTOXICITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERPHASE; MITOSIS; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; UBIQUITINATION; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; CHEMISTRY; GAMMA RADIATION; GENETICS; HELA CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RADIATION RESPONSE; RNA INTERFERENCE; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GAMMA RAYS; HELA CELLS; HISTONES; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; MITOSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84926624707     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2014.977067     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08467
2. Shiloh Y. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3:155-68; PMID:12612651; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1011
3. Stucki M, Clapperton J, Mohammad D, Yaffe M, Smerdon S, Jackson S. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2005; 123:1213-26; PMID: 16377563; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.038
4. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Faustrup H, Melander F, Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 2007; 131:887-900; PMID:18001824; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.040
5. Doil C, Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Menard P, Larsen DH, Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J, Panier S, Durocher D, Bartek J, et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 2009; 136:435-46; PMID:19203579; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.041
6. Mattiroli F, Vissers Joseph HA, van Dijk Willem J, Ikpa P, Citterio E, Vermeulen W, Marteijn Jurgen A, Sixma Titia K. RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling. Cell 2012; 150:1182-95; PMID:22980979; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.005
7. Fradet-Turcotte A, Canny MD, Escribano-Diaz C, Orthwein A, Leung CCY, Huang H, Landry M-C, Kitevski-LeBlanc J, Noordermeer SM, Sicheri F, et al. 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 2013; 499:50-4; PMID: 23760478; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12318
8. Botuyan MV, Lee J, Ward IM, Kim J-E, Thompson JR, Chen J, Mer G. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific Recognition of Histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA Repair. Cell 2006; 127:1361-73; PMID:17190600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.043
9. Wang B, Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Zhang D, Smogorzewska A, Gygi SP, Elledge SJ. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science 2007; 316:1194-8; PMID: 17525340; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1139476
10. Kim H, Chen J, Yu X. Ubiquitin-binding protein RAP80 mediates BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response. Science 2007; 316:1202-5; PMID: 17525342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1139621
11. Noon AT, Shibata A, Rief N, Lobrich M, Stewart GS, Jeggo PA, Goodarzi AA. 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:177-84; PMID:20081839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2017
12. Escribano-Díaz C, Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Xing M, Young Jordan TF, Tkáč J, Cook Michael A, Rosebrock Adam P, Munro M, Canny Marella D, et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 2013; 49:872-83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001
13. Dimitrova N, Chen Y-CM, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 2008; 456:524-8; PMID:18931659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07433
14. Di Virgilio M, Callen E, Yamane A, Zhang W, Jankovic M, Gitlin AD, Feldhahn N, Resch W, Oliveira TY, Chait BT, et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 2013; 339:711-5; PMID:23306439; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230624
15. Chapman JR, Barral P, Vannier J-B, Borel V, Steger M, Tomas-Loba A, Sartori Alessandro A, Adams Ian R, Batista Facundo D, Boulton Simon J. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol Cell 2013; 49:858-71; PMID:23333305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.002
16. Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, Sfeir A, de Lange T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5 0 end resection. Science 2013; 339:700-4; PMID: 23306437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231573
17. Panier S, Boulton SJ. Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014; 15:7-18; PMID:24326623; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3719
18. Zimmermann M, de Lange T. 53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. Trends Cell Biol 2014; 24:108-17; PMID: 24094932; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.003
19. Giunta S, Belotserkovskaya R, Jackson SP. DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:197-207; PMID: 20660628; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200911156
20. Giunta S, Jackson SP. Give me a break, but not in mitosis: the mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double-strand breaks with early signaling events. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:1215-21; PMID:21412056; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.8.15334
21. Zhang W, Peng G, Lin S-Y, Zhang P. DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:35899-905; PMID:21878640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.267690
22. Nelson G, Buhmann M, von Zglinicki T. DNA damage foci in mitosis are devoid of 53BP1. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:3379-83; PMID:19806024; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.20.9857
23. van Vugt MATM, Gardino AK, Linding R, Ostheimer GJ, Reinhardt HC, Ong S-E, Tan CS, Miao H, Keezer SM, Li J, et al. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol 2010; 8:e1000287; PMID:20126263; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000287
24. Macurek L, Benada J, Müllers E, Halim VA, Krejčíková K, Burdová K, Pecháčková S, Hodný Z, Lindqvist A, Medema RH, et al. Downregulation of Wip1 phosphatase modulates the cellular threshold of DNA damage signaling in mitosis. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:251-62; PMID:23255129; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.23057
25. Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villén J, Beausoleil SA, Bakalarski CE, Elledge SJ, Gygi SP. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105:10762-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805139105
26. Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, Kumar C, Miller ML, Jensen LJ, Gnad F, Cox J, Jensen TS, Nigg EA, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal 2010; 3:ra3-; PMID: 20068231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000475
27. Vassilev LT. Cell cycle synchronization at the G2/M phase border by reversible inhibition of CDK1. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:2555-6; PMID:17172841; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.5.22.3463
28. Vassilev LT, Tovar C, Chen S, Knezevic D, Zhao X, Sun H, Heimbrook DC, Chen L. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 103:10660-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600447103
29. Seki A, Coppinger JA, Du H, Jang C-Y, Yates JR, Fang G. Plk1- and b-TrCP-dependent degradation of Bora controls mitotic progression. J Cell Biol 2008; 181: 65-78; PMID:18378770; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200712027
30. Bruinsma W, Raaijmakers JA, Medema RH. Switching Polo-like kinase-1 on and off in time and space. Trends Biochem Sci 2012; 37:534-42; PMID:23141205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2012.09.005
31. Takaki T, Trenz K, Costanzo V, Petronczki M. Pololike kinase 1 reaches beyond mitosis - cytokinesis, DNA damage response, and development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:650-60; PMID:19000759; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.005
32. van Vugt MATM, Brás A, Medema RH. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damageinduced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 2004; 15:799-811; PMID:15350223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.015
33. Medema RH, Macurek L. Checkpoint control and cancer. Oncogene 2012; 31:2601-13; PMID:21963855; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.451
34. Mamely I, van Vugt MATM, Smits VAJ, Semple JI, Lemmens B, Perrakis A, Medema RH, Freire R. Pololike kinase-1 controls proteasome-dependent degradation of claspin during checkpoint recovery. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1950-5; PMID:16934469; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.026
35. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Bartek J, Lukas J. Destruction of claspin by SCF[b]TrCP restrains Chk1 activation and facilitates recovery from genotoxic stress. Mol Cell 2006; 23:307-18; PMID:16885021; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.016
36. Nakajima H, Toyoshima-Morimoto F, Taniguchi E, Nishida E. Identification of a consensus motif for Plk (Polo-like Kinase) phosphorylation reveals Myt1 as a Plk1 substrate∗. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:25277-80; PMID:12738781; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C300126200
37. Santamaria A, Wang B, Elowe S, Malik R, Zhang F, Bauer M, Schmidt A, Silljé HHW, Körner R, Nigg EA. The Plk1-dependent phosphoproteome of the early mitotic spindle. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011; 10: M110.004457; PMID:20860994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M110.004457
38. Heijink A, Krajewska M, van Vugt MA. The DNA damage response during mitosis. Mutat Res 2013; 750:45-55; PMID:23880065; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.003
39. Petronczki M, Lénárt P, Peters J-M. Polo on the rise - from mitotic entry to cytokinesis with Plk1. Dev Cell 2008; 14:646-59; PMID:18477449; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.04.014
40. Jullien D, Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC, Adachi Y. Kinetochore localisation of the DNA damage response component 53BP1 during mitosis. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:71-9; PMID:11801725
41. Lindon C, Pines J. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J Cell Biol 2004; 164:233-41; PMID:14734534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200309035
42. Cha H, Wang X, Li H, Fornace AJ. A functional role for p38 MAPK in modulating mitotic transit in the absence of stress. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:22984-92; PMID:17548358; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700735200
43. Lee K, Kenny AE, Rieder CL. P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity is required during mitosis for timely satisfaction of the mitotic checkpoint but not for the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:2150-60; PMID:20462950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0125
44. Elia AEH, Rellos P, Haire LF, Chao JW, Ivins FJ, Hoepker K, Mohammad D, Cantley LC, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB. The molecular basis for phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the polobox domain. Cell 2003; 115:83-95; PMID:14532005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00725-6
45. Gatti M, Pinato S, Maspero E, Soffientini P, Polo S, Penengo L. A novel ubiquitin mark at the N-terminal tail of histone H2As targeted by RNF168 ubiquitin ligase. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2538-44; PMID: 22713238; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.20919
46. Harrigan JA, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Dimitrova DS, Polo SE, Bradshaw CR, Fraser P, Jackson SP. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:97-108; PMID:21444690
47. Lukas C, Savic V, Bekker-Jensen S, Doil C, Neumann B, Solvhoj Pedersen R, Grofte M, Chan KL, Hickson ID, Bartek J, et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:243-53; PMID:21317883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2201
48. Macurek L, Lindqvist A, Lim D, Lampson MA, Klompmaker R, Freire R, Clouin C, Taylor SS, Yaffe MB, Medema RH. Polo-like kinase-1 is activated by aurora a to promote checkpoint recovery. Nature 2008; 455:119-23; PMID:18615013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07185
49. Hori T, Shang W-H, Toyoda A, Misu S, Monma N, Ikeo K, Molina O, Vargiu G, Fujiyama A, Kimura H, et al. Histone H4 Lys 20 monomethylation of the CENP-A nucleosome is essential for kinetochore assembly. Dev Cell 2014; 29:740-9; PMID:24960696; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.05.001
50. Lee D-H, Acharya Sanket S, Kwon M, Drane P, Guan Y, Adelmant G, Kalev P, Shah J, Pellman D, Marto Jarrod A, et al. Dephosphorylation enables the recruitment of 53BP1 to double-strand DNA breaks. Mol Cell 2014; 54:512-25; PMID:24703952; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.020
51. Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Noordermeer SM, Canny MD, Brun CM, Strecker J, Escribano-Diaz C, Durocher D. Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions. Science 2014; 344:189-93; PMID:24652939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1248024
52. Sharma N, Zhu Q, Wani G, He J, Wang Q-e, Wani AA. USP3 counteracts RNF168 via deubiquitinating H2A and gH2AX at lysine 13 and 15. Cell Cycle 2014; 13:106-14; PMID:24196443; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.26814
53. Mosbech A, Lukas C, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N. The deubiquitylating enzyme USP44 counteracts the DNA double-strand break response mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:16579-87; PMID:23615962; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.459917
54. Delgado-Díaz MR, Martín Y, Berg A, Freire R, Smits VAJ. Dub3 controls DNA damage signalling by direct deubiquitination of H2AX. Mol Oncol 2014; 8 (5):884-93; PMID:24704006
55. Joo H-Y, Zhai L, Yang C, Nie S, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Chang C, Wang H. Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination. Nature 2007; 449:1068-72; PMID:17914355; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06256
56. Xu Y, Yang H, Joo H-Y, Yu J-H, Smith Iv AD, Schneider D, Chow LT, Renfrow M, Wang H. Ubp-M serine 552 phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 regulates cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:3408-16
57. Cai S-Y, Babbitt RW, Marchesi VT. A mutant deubiquitinating enzyme (Ubp-M) associates with mitotic chromosomes and blocks cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999; 96:2828-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.6.2828
58. Simoneau A, Robellet X, Ladouceur A-M, D'Amours D. Cdk1-dependent regulation of the Mre11 complex couples DNA repair pathways to cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2014; 13:1078-90; PMID:24553123; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.27946
59. Esashi F, Christ N, Gannon J, Liu Y, Hunt T, Jasin M, West SC. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 2005; 434:598-604; PMID:15800615; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03404
60. Hayashi MT, Cesare AJ, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Lazzerini-Denchi E, Karlseder J. A telomere-dependent DNA damage checkpoint induced by prolonged mitotic arrest. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:387-94; PMID:22407014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2245
61. Knobel PA, Belotserkovskaya R, Galanty Y, Schmidt CK, Jackson SP, Stracker TH. USP28 is recruited to sites of DNA damage by the tandem BRCT domains of 53BP1 but plays a minor role in double-strand break metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 2014; 34:2062-74; PMID:24687851; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00197-14