16-Month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions

Science

Volumn 332, Issue 6037, 2011, Pages 1524-

  Gweon, Hyowon ^a   Schulz, Laura ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CHILD; COGNITION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 79959500256     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1204493     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. H. H. Kelley, Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 15, 192 (1967).
2. S. J. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009).
3. A. Gopnik, L. E. Schulz, Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 371 (2004).
4. H. Gweon, J. B. Tenenbaum, L. E. Schulz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9066 (2010).
5. D. A. Baldwin, E. M. Markman, R. L. Melartin, Child Dev. 64, 711 (1993).
6. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
7. T. L. Griffiths, J. B. Tenenbaum, Psychol. Rev. 116, 661 (2009).
8. The two within-agent conditions provided internal replication; no differences were predicted between these conditions.