Social learning through a REDD+ 'village agreement': Insights from the KFCP in Indonesia

Asia Pacific Viewpoint

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 79-95

  Mulyani, Mari ^a   Jepson, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Indonesia; KFCP; Participation; REDD+; Social learning; Village agreement

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY BUILDING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LEARNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; VILLAGE;

INDONESIA;

EID: 84926484909     PISSN: 13607456     EISSN: 14678373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/apv.12083     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. AIP (2009) Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) design document. Australia Indonesia Partnership (AIP). Retrieved 2 February 2011, from Website: http://formin.finland.fi/public/download.aspx?ID=48885&GUID=%7B9B0BA3BA-25BF-4FEA-985B-B6DADCA60EAC%7D
2. BOS (2013) Annual report 2012. Bogor, Indonesia: The Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation. Retrieved 3 March 2013, from Website: http://orangutan.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Lowres-Annual-Report-2012.pdf
3. Brewer, J.F. (2013) From experiential knowledge to public participation: Social learning at the community fisheries action roundtable, Environmental Management 52(2): 321-334.
4. Brito, B., L. Micol, C. David, S. Nakhooda, F. Daviet and A. Thuault (2009) The Governance of Forests Toolkit (Version 1): A draft framework of indicators for assessing governance of the forest sector. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
5. Buck, L., E. Wollenberg and D. Edmunds (2001) Social learning in the collaborative management of community forests: Lessons from the field, in E. Wollenberg, D. Edmunds, L. Buck, J. Fox and S. Brodt (eds.), Social learning in community forests, pp. 1-20. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
6. Bulkeley, H. and P. Newell (2010) Governing climate change. London and New York: Routledge.
7. CARE (2009a) KFCP socio-economic baseline report. Report prepared by CARE International Indonesia for Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership. Retrieved 2 February 2011, from Website: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/145800/20140623-0017/www.iafcp.or.id/uploads/20121128120700.CARE__Final_Baseline_Report_and_Exec_Summary_Nov_2009.pdf
8. CARE (2009b) Review of Village land-use Plans and the planning process. Report prepared by CARE International Indonesia for the Kalimantan Forests and Climate. Retrieved 2 February 2011, from Website: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/145800/20140623-0017/www.iafcp.or.id/uploads/20130515175458.CARE_Activity_2.8_Village_Planning.pdf
9. CKPP (2008) Provisional report of the Central Kalimantan Peatland Project. Central Kalimantan Peatland Project (CKPP). Retrieved 2 February 2011, from Website: http://www.globalrestorationnetwork.org/uploads/files/CaseStudyAttachments/252_central-kalimantan-peatlands-project.pdf
10. Collins, L.D. (2010) KFCP village institution startup strategy: Report prepared for the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership. Jakarta, Indonesia: Australia Indonesia Partnership.
11. Cooke, B. and U. Kothari (2001) The case for participation as tyranny, in B. Cooke and U. Kothari (eds.), Participation: The new tyranny?, pp. 1-15. London: Zed Books.
12. Corbera, E. and H. Schroeder (2011) Governing and implementing REDD+, Environmental Science and Policy 14(2): 89-99.
13. Czarniawska, B. (2007) Shadowing: And other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies, 1st edn. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School DK.
14. Davis, C. (2010) Governance in REDD+. Taking stock of governance issues raised in readiness proposals submitted to the FCPF and the UN-REDD Programme. Paper presented at REDD+ Expert Workshop, 24-25 May 2010, Chatham House, London. World Resources Institute.
15. Doohan, K. (2013) Transformative practices: Imagining and enacting relationships in the context of resource development, the Argyle case, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54: 218-231.
16. FAO (2011) The state of forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin and Southeast Asia. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). Retrieved 2 June 2012, from Website: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2247e/i2247e00.pdf
17. Forsyth, T. (2009) Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+: Participation, integration and coordination, in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W.D. Sunderlin and S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff (eds.), Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options, pp. 113-124. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
18. Galudra, G., M. Van Noordwijk, I.S. Sunyato and U. Pradhan (2010) Hot spot of emission and confusion: Land tenure insecurity, contested policies and competing claims in the Central Kalimantan Ex-Mega Rice Project Area. Retrieved 2 June 2012, from Website: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs/WP16601.PDF
19. GCF (2011) Central Kalimantan Indonesia. Governor Climate Forum (GCF). Retrieved 2 March 2012, from Website: http://www.gcftaskforce.org/newsletter/index_en.php?issue=201108#sec1art1
20. Gillespie, P. (2012) Participation and power in Indonesian oil palm plantations, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 53(3): 254-271.
21. GOI (2012) National REDD+ strategy. REDD+ task force (satgas persiapan kelembagaan REDD+). Government of Indonesia (GOI). Retrieved 2 April 2013, from Website: http://www.unorcid.org/upload/doc_lib/Indonesia%20REDD+%20National%20Strategy.pdf
22. Graham, J., B. Amos and T. Plumptre (2003) Principles for good governance in the 21st century. Ottawa, Canada: Institute on Governance.
23. Heldeweg, M.A. (2005) Towards good environmental governance in Europe, European Environmental Law Review 14(1): 2-24.
24. Howitt, R., K. Doohan, S. Suchet-Pearson etal. (2013) Intercultural capacity deficits: Contested geographies of coexistence in natural resource management, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54(2): 126-140.
25. IGES (2011) Mawas peatlands conservation area project. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).
26. Ison, R. and D. Watson (2007) Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland's water, Ecology and Society 12(1): 21. Retrieved 2 April 2014. from Website: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art21/
27. Joosten, H., M. Tapio-Bistrom and S. Tol (2012) Peatlands - Guidance for climate change mitigation by conservation, rehabilitation and sustainable use, 2nd edn. Rome, Italy: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wetlands International.
28. KFCP (2012a) Benefit sharing and engaging with communities. Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP). Retrieved 10 April 2013, from Website: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/145800/20140623-0017/www.iafcp.or.id/uploads/20131212133145.Participation_and_Benefits_in_KFCP.pdf
29. KFCP (2012b) Village agreement. Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP). Retrieved 10 April 2013, from Website: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/145800/20140623-0017/www.iafcp.or.id/uploads/signed-VA-Tb-Mangkutup-EN.pdf
30. KFCP (2012c) Village agreements-factsheet. Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP). Retrieved 10 April 2013, from Website: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/145800/20140623-0017/www.iafcp.or.id/uploads/20121128072654.Fact_sheet_Village_Agreements.pdf
31. Lin, L., S.K. Pattanayak, E.O. Sills and W.D. Sunderlin (2012) Financing REDD+, in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin and L.V. Verchot (eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, pp. 209-230. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
32. Lounela, A. (2015) Climate change disputes and justice in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56(1): 62-78.
33. Lyster, R. (2011) REDD, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law, Environmental Science and Policy 14(2): 118-126.
34. McDermott, C., L. Coad, A. Helfgott and H. Schroeder (2012) Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: Actors, interests and ideas, Environmental Science and Policy 21: 63-72.
35. McDermott, C.L. (2013) Certification and equity: Applying an 'equity framework' to compare certification schemes across product sectors and scales, Environmental Science and Policy 33(0): 428-437.
36. McDermott, C.L. (2014) REDDuced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon - The search for common interests in international forest governance, Environmental Science and Policy 35(0): 12-19.
37. McDermott, M., S. Mahanty and K. Schreckenberg (2013) Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services, Environmental Science and Policy 33: 416-427.
38. McGregor, A. (2010) Green and REDD? Towards a political ecology of avoided deforestation programmes in Aceh, Human Geography 3(2): 21-34.
39. May, P.H., B. Millikan and M.F. Gebara (2010) The context of REDD in Brazil: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional paper 55. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
40. Mohan, G. (1996) Globalisation and governance: The paradoxes of adjustment in Africa, in E. Kofman and G. Youngs (eds.), Globalisation: Theory and practice, pp. 452-480. London: Pinter.
41. Mohan, G. and K. Stokke (2000) Participatory development and empowerment: The dangers of localism author(s), Third World Quarterly 21(2): 247-268.
42. Mulyani, M. and P. Jepson (2013) REDD and forest governance in Indonesia: A multistakeholder study of perceived challenges and opportunities, The Journal of Environment and Development 22(3): 261-283.
43. Olbrei, E. and S. Howes (2012) A very real and practical contribution? Lessons from the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership. Development Policy Centre. Crawford School of Economics and Government. Retrieved 10 April 2013, from Website: http://devpolicy.anu.edu.au/pdf/papers/DP_16_-_A_very_real_and_practical_contribution.pdf
44. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development, World Development 24: 1073-1087.
46. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007) Transition towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change, Water Resources Management 21(1): 49-62.
47. Pahl-Wostl, C., J. Gupta and D. Petry (2008) Governance and the global water system: A theoretical exploration, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 14(4): 419-435.
48. Penca, J. (2013) Marketing the market: The ideology of market mechanisms for biodiversity conservation, Transnational Environmental Law 2(2): 235-257.
49. Peskett, L. and G. Brodnig (2011) Carbon rights in REDD plus : Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people, Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved 10 April 2013. from Website: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/Resources/244362-1232059926563/5747581-1239131985528/5999762-1318623469948/CarbonRightsReport.pdf
50. Peters-Stanley, M., G. Gonzales and D. Yin (2013) Covering new ground: State of the forest carbon market 2013. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace publication. Retrieved 14 January 2014. from Website: http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/resources.library.page.php?page_id=10164§ion=carbon_market&eod=1
51. Reed, M.S., G. Cundill, I. Fazey etal. (2010) What is social learning? Response to Pahl-Wostl. 2006. 'The importance of social learning in restoring the multi functionality of rivers and floodplains', Ecology and Society 15(4): r1. Retrieved 12 April 2013. from Website: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art10/
52. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., S. Atmadja, A.D. Ekaputri, D.Y. Intarini, Y. Indriatmoko and P. Astri (2014) Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia, World Development 55(0): 68-83.
53. REDD+ Task-Force (2013) Indonesia REDD+ Task Force and United Nations Development Programme: Support to the establishment of Indonesia REDD+ infrastructure and capacity. Annual report January-December 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2013, from Website: http://www.id.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/docs/envi/REDD+%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf
54. Rosenbarger, A. (2009) Community-based forestry in Kalimantan, an assessment of authority, policy, and capacity. Ecosystem Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University.
55. Rydin, Y. and M. Pennington (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital, The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 5(2): 153-169.
56. Schroeder, H. (2010) Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 10(4): 317-332.
57. Steni, B. and N. Hadad (2012) REDD+ safeguards in Indonesia, HuMa, Jakarta, Indonesia: Bank Information Center; World Resource Institute.
58. Strassburg, B., K. Turner, B. Fisher, R. Schaeffer and A. Love (2008) An empirically-derived mechanism of combined incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation. Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
59. Streck, C. and C. Parker (2012) Financing REDD, in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin and L.V. Verchot (eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, pp. 111-127. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
60. Sunderlin, W.D., A.M. Larson, A.E. Duchelle etal. (2013) How are REDD proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam, World Development 55: 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.013
61. Tippett, J., B. Searle, C. Pahl-Wostl and Y. Rees (2005) Social learning in public participation in river basin management - Early findings from Harmony COP European case studies, Environmental Science and Policy 8(3): 287-299.
62. UNFCCC (2011) The Cancun Agreements Decision 1/CP.16: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term cooperative action under the convention, pp. 1-31. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
63. UNFCCC (2014) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.