Governing and implementing REDD+

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 89-99

  Corbera, Esteve ^a,b   Schroeder, Heike ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon; Climate change; Governance; Institutions; REDD+

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 79952625200     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agrawal A., Angelsen A. Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals. Realising REDD+ 2009, 201-212. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
2. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
3. Angelsen A. Policy options to reduce deforestation. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, 125-138. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
4. Backstrand K. Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics 2008, 8(3):74-102.
5. Biermann F., Betsill M., Gupta J., Kanie N., Lebel L., Liverman D., Schroeder H., Siebenhuener B. Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project 2009, Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20, Bonn, IHDP.
6. Biermann F., Betsill M., Camargo Vieira S., Gupta J., Kanie N., Lebel L., Liverman D., Schroeder H., Siebenhuener B., Zanda P., Zondervan R. Navigating the anthropocene: the Earth System Governance Project strategy paper. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.005.
7. Boyd E., Corbera E., Estrada M. UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): what the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2008, 8:95-112.
8. Brown D., Seymour F., Peskett L. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm?. Moving Ahead With REDD 2008, 107-118. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
9. Bulkeley H., Newell P. Governing Climate Change 2010, Routledge, London and New York.
10. Butler R.A., Pin Koh L., Ghazoul J. REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes. Conservation Letters 2009, 2:67-73.
11. Caplow S., Jagger P., Lawlor K., Sills E. Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early 1 forest carbon projects: lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:152-167.
12. Cerbu G.A., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD: a global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:168-180.
13. Corbera E., Brown K., Adger W.N. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Development and Change 2007, 38(4):587-613.
14. Corbera E., Estrada M., Brown K. How do regulated and voluntary carbon-offset schemes compare?. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2009, 6(1):26-50.
15. Corbera E., Estrada M., Brown K. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Climatic Change 2010, 100(3-4):355-388.
16. Corbera E., Estrada M., May P., Navarro G., Pacheco P. Rights to forests and carbon. Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Paper Presented at the 'Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+' 2010.
17. Cowie A., Schneider U.A., Montanarella L. Potential synergies between existing multilateral environmental agreements in the implementation of land use, land-use change and forestry activities. Environmental Science and Policy 2007, 10:335-352.
18. Davis, C., Nakhooda, S., Daviet, F., 2010a. A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Proposals, v.1.3. WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute.
19. Davis, C., Williams, A., Goers, L., Daviet, F., Lupberger, S., 2010b. A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Proposals, v.1.4.
20. De Fries R., Archard F., Brown S., Herold M., Murdiyarso D., Schlamadinger B., de Souza C. Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries. Environmental Science and Policy 2007, 10:385-394.
21. Dryzek J.S. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory 2001, 29:651-669.
22. Estrada M. REDD+ much still to be done. Trading Carbon Magazine 2010, 4(5):s6-s8.
23. Ezzine de Blas D., Börner J., Violato Espada A.L., Nascimento N., Piketty M.G. Forest loss and management in land reform settlements: implications for REDD governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:188-200.
24. Forsyth T. Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+: participation, integration and coordination. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, 113-124. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
25. Grainger A., Obersteiner M. A framework for structuring the global forest monitoring landscape in the REDD-Era. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:127-139.
26. Gregersen H., El Lakany H., Karsenty A., White A. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+? Rights and Realities of Paying for REDD+ 2010, Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC.
27. Gupta A. Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2008, 8(2):1-7.
28. Hajek F., Scriven J., Castro A., Ventresca M.J. Regime-building for REDD+: evidence on anatomy and proximate outcomes from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:201-215.
29. Houghton R. Tropical deforestation as a source of greenhouse gas emissions. Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change 2005, Belem, IPAM and Environmental Defense. P. Moutinho, S. Schwartzman (Eds.).
30. Humphreys D. Logjam. Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance 2006, Earthscan, London.
31. Humphreys D. The politics of 'Avoided Deforestation': historical context and contemporary issues. International Forestry Review 2008, 10:433-442.
32. Hyden G., Mease K., Foresti M., Fritz V. Governance Assessments for Local Stakeholders: What the World Governance Assessment Offers. Working Paper 287 2008, Overseas Development Institute, London.
33. Johns T., Merry F., Stickler C., Nepstad D., Laporte N., Goetz S. A three-fund approach to incorporating government, public and private forest stewards into a REDD funding mechanism. International Forestry Review 2008, 10(3):458-464.
34. Kanowski P.J., McDermott C.L., Cashore B.W. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:111-117.
35. Karsenty A. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: facing critical choices. International Forestry Review 2008, 10(3):443-457.
36. Keohane R.O. The demand for international regimes. International Organization 1982, 36(2):325-355.
37. Larson A., Petkova E. Synergies and opportunities. An introduction to forest governance, people and REDD+ in Latin America. Paper Presented at the 'Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+' 2010.
38. Le Quéré C., Raupach M., Canadell J., Marland G., et al. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience 2009, 2:831-836.
39. Lövbrand E., Rindefjäll T., Nordqvist J. Closing the legitimacy gap in global environmental governance? Lessons from the emerging CDM market. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9(2):74-100.
40. Lovera S. REDD realities. Contours of Climate Justice: Ideas for Shaping New Climate and Energy Politics 2009, 46-53. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, Germany. U. Brand, N. Bullard, E. Lander, T. Müller (Eds.).
41. Lyster M. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: the role of law. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:118-126.
42. McDermott C.L., Cashore B., Kanowski P. Global Environmental Forest Policies 2010, An International Comparison, Earthscan, London.
43. Melick D. Credibility of REDD and experiences from Papua New Guinea. Conservation Biology 2010, 24(2):359-361.
44. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1202-1208.
45. Nasi R., Putz F.E., Pacheco P. Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon. Paper Presented at the 'Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+' 2010.
46. Newell P., Paterson M. Climate Capitalism. Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
47. Okereke C., Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:82-95.
48. Paavola, J., 2003. Environmental Justice and Governance: Theory and Lessons from the Implementation of the European Union's Habitat Directive. Working Paper EDM 03-05. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, Norwich.
49. Palmer Fry B. Locally-based monitoring - the 'M' in REDD+ MRV. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:181-187.
50. Peskett L.M., Schreckenberg K., Brown J. Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:216-229.
51. Putz F.E., Redford K.H. Dangers of carbon-based conservation. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:400-401.
52. Ramsteiner E. Governance concepts and their application in forest policy initiatives from global to local levels. Small-scale Forestry 2009, 8:143-158.
53. Reed, D., 2010. A Registry Approach for REDD+. The REDD Desk. Available at: http://www.theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdf/2010/Registry_Approach_for_REDD.pdf.
54. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson A., Stuart Chapin F., Lambin E.F., Lenton T.M., Scheffer M., Folke C., Schellnhuber H.J., Nykvist B., de Wit C.A., Hughes T., van der Leeuw S., Rodhe H., Sörlin S., Snyder P.K., Costanza R., Svedin U., Falkenmark M., Karlberg L., Corell R.W., Fabry V.J., Hansen J., Walker B., Liverman D., Richardson K., Crutzen P., Foley J.A. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461:472-475.
55. Schroeder H. Agency in International Climate Negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and a) voided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10(4):317-332. 10.1007/s10784-010-9138-2.
56. Seymour F. Forests, Climate Change and Human Rights: Managing Risk and Tradeoffs 2008, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
57. Seymour F., Angelsen A. Summary and conclusions: REDD wine in old wineskins?. Realising REDD+ 2009, 293-304. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
58. Skutch M., Van Laake P.E. REDD as multi-level governance in the making. Energy and Environment 2009, 19(6):831-844.
59. Skutsch, M., McCall, M.K., Karky, B., Zahabu, E., Peters-Guarin, G., 2009. Case studies on measuring and assessing forest degradation: community measurement of carbon stock change for REDD. Working Paper 156. FAO Forest Resources Assessment, Rome.
60. Skutsch M., Vickers B., McCall M.K. Alternative models for carbon payments to communities under REDD+: A comparison using the Polis model of actor inducements. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:140-151.
61. Smouts M.C. The issue of an international forest regime. International Forestry Review 2008, 10(3):429-432.
62. Streck, C., Gómez-Echeverri, L., Gutman, P., Loisel, C., Werksman, J., 2009. REDD+ insitutional options assessment. A report prepared by the Meridian Institute for the Government of Norway.
63. Tacconi L. Illegal logging and the future of the forest. Illegal Logging 2007, 275-290. Earthscan, London. L. Tacconi (Ed.).
64. Tacconi L., Downs F., Larmour P. Anti-corruption policies in the forest sector and REDD+. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, 163-174. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
65. Thompson M.C., Baruah M., Carr E.R. Seeing REDD+ as a Project of Environmental Governance. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:100-110.
66. van Dam C. Indigenous territories and REDD in Latin America. Opportunity or threat?. Paper Presented at the 'Oaxaca Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+' 2010.
67. Venter O., Meijaard E., Possingham H., Dennis R., Shiel D., Wich S., Hovani L., Wilson K. Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals. Conservation Letters 2009, 2:123-129.
68. Young O. International regimes: toward a new theory of institutions. World Politics 1986, 39(1):104-122.
69. Young O. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay, and Scale 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge and London.
70. Young O., King L., Schroeder H. Institutions and Environmental Change 2008, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.