A decoy-free approach to the identification of peptides

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1792-1798

  Gonnelli, Giulia ^a,b   Stock, Michiel ^b   Verwaeren, Jan ^b   Maddelein, Davy ^a,b   De Baets, Bernard ^b   Martens, Lennart ^a,b   Degroeve, Sven ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

decoy databases; machine learning; peptide identification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE; ALGORITHM; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LOGISTIC MODELS; MACHINE LEARNING; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84926435624     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: 15353907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr501164r     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aebersold, R.; Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics Nature 2003, 422, 198-207
2. Perkins, D. N.; Pappin, D. J.; Creasy, D. M.; Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567
3. Craig, R.; Beavis, R. C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467
4. Geer, L. Y. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3, 958-964.
5. Diament, B. J.; Noble, W. S. Faster SEQUEST searching for peptide identification from tandem mass spectra J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3871-3879
6. Park, C. Y.; Klammer, A. A.; Käll, L.; MacCoss, M. J.; Noble, W. S. Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3022-3027
7. Tanner, S. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 4626-4639
8. Käll, L.; Storey, J. D.; MacCoss, M. J.; Noble, W. S. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 29-34
9. Elias, J. E.; Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214
10. Renuse, S.; Chaerkady, R.; Pandey, A. Proteogenomics Proteomics 2011, 11, 620-630
11. Muth, T.; Benndorf, D.; Reichl, U.; Rapp, E.; Martens, L. Searching for a needle in a stack of needles: challenges in metaproteomics data analysis Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9, 578-585
12. Colaert, N.; Degroeve, S.; Helsens, K.; Martens, L. Analysis of the Resolution Limitations of Peptide Identification Algorithms J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5555-5561
13. Ansong, C.; Purvine, S. O.; Adkins, J. N.; Lipton, M. S.; Smith, R. D. Proteogenomics: needs and roles to be filled by proteomics in genome annotation Briefings Funct. Genomics Proteomics 2008, 7, 50-62
14. Castellana, N.; Bafna, V. Proteogenomics to discover the full coding content of genomes: a computational perspective J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2124-2135
15. Jagtap, P. A two-step database search method improves sensitivity in peptide sequence matches for metaproteomics and proteogenomics studies Proteomics 2013, 13, 1352-1357
16. Helmy, M.; Sugiyama, N.; Tomita, M.; Ishihama, Y. Mass spectrum sequential subtraction speeds up searching large peptide MS/MS spectra datasets against large nucleotide databases for proteogenomics Genes Cells 2012, 17, 633-644
17. Bitton, D. A.; Smith, D. L.; Connolly, Y.; Scutt, P. J.; Miller, C. J. An integrated mass-spectrometry pipeline identifies novel protein coding-regions in the human genome PLoS One 2010, 5, e8949
18. Blakeley, P.; Overton, I. M.; Hubbard, S. J. Addressing statistical biases in nucleotide-derived protein databases for proteogenomic search strategies J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5221-5234
19. Keller, A.; Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392
20. Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Keller, A.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658
21. Renard, B. Y. Estimating the confidence of peptide identifications without decoy databases Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 4314-4318
22. Kim, S.; Gupta, N.; Pevzner, P. A. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3354-3363
23. Choi, H.; Ghosh, D.; Nesvizhskii, A. I. Statistical Validation of Peptide Identifications in Large-Scale Proteomics Using the Target-Decoy Database Search Strategy and Flexible Mixture Modeling J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 286-292
24. Helsens, K. ms-lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics Proteomics 2010, 10, 1261-1264
25. Helsens, K.; Martens, L.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Gevaert, K. MascotDatfile: an open-source library to fully parse and analyse MASCOT MS/MS search results Proteomics 2007, 7, 364-366
26. Frenay, B.; Verleysen, M. Classification in the Presence of Label Noise: A Survey IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 2014, 25, 845-869
27. Brosch, M.; Yu, L.; Hubbard, T.; Choudhary, J. Accurate and Sensitive Peptide Identification with Mascot Percolator J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3176-3181
28. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning; Springer: New York, 2001.
29. Friedman, J.; Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent J. Stat. Software 2010, 33, 1-22
30. Paulovich, A. G. Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 242-54
31. Verheggen, K.; Barsnes, H.; Martens, L. Distributed computing and data storage in proteomics: Many hands make light work, and a stronger memory Proteomics 2014, 14, 367-377