Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: A systematic review

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 65-76

  De Luca Canto, G ^a,b   Pacheco Pereira C ^b   Lagravere, M O ^b   Flores Mir, C ^b   Major, P W ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Digital model; Laser scanning; Plaster model; Systematic review; Validity

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOOTH ARCH;

CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; OPTICAL IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84926418730     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12068     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O'Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 2012;39:151-9.
2. Shastry S, Park JH. Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. Angle Orthod 2014;84:62-7.
3. McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD. Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod 1992;19:227-32.
4. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:517-22.
5. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
6. Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 2012;82:1098-106.
7. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:831-7.
8. Grunheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:157-64.
9. Oliveira DDRA, Drummond MEL, Pantuzo MCG, Lanna AMQ. Confiabilidade do uso de modelos digitais tridimensionais como exame auxiliar ao diagnostico ortodontico: um estudo piloto. R Dental Press Ortodont Ortop Fac 2007;12:84-93.
10. Sohmura T, Wakabayashi K, Lowmunkong R, Hojo H, Kusumoto N, Okuda H et al. 3D shape measurement of dental casts using medical X-ray CT. Dent Mater J 2004;23:121-8.
11. Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:269-73.
12. Kaihara Y, Kihara T, Kakayama A, Amano H, Nikawa H, Kozai K. Accuracy of a non-contact 3D measuring system for dental model analysis. Pediatr Dent J. 2013;23:71-8.
13. Kim J, Heo G, Lagravere MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014;84:443-50.
14. Sanches JO, dos Santos-Pinto LA, dos Santos-Pinto A, Grehs B, Jeremias F. Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying Tanaka and Johnston's equation. Dental Press J of Orthod. 2013;18:128-33.
15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-41.
16. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
17. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803.
18. Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod 2010;80:254-61.
19. Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:83-90.
20. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H, Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:288-95.
21. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008;35:191-201; discussion 175.
22. Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischer A. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:90-5.
23. Kim BC, Lee CE, Park W, Kang SH, Zhengguo P, Yi CK et al. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:370-8.