Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying tanaka and johnston's equation

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 128-133

  Sanches, Júlia Olien ^a   Santos Pinto, Lourdes Aparecida Martins dos ^a   Santos Pinto, Ary dos ^a   Grehs, Betina ^a   Jeremias, Fabiano ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental casts; Test reproducibility; Three dimensional image

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CASTS; DENTURE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEST REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE;

DENTAL CASTS; TEST REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE;

BICUSPID; CUSPID; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84878223630     PISSN: 21769451     EISSN: 21776709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000100024     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alhaija ESJ, Qudeimat, MA. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Jordanian population: comparison of two methods. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16(2):104-10.
2. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88(4):798-801.
3. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008;35(3):191-201.
4. Redmond WR. Digital models: a new diagnostic tool. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35(6):386-7.
5. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrián R. Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11(1):e88-93.
6. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(1):101-5.
7. Whetten JL, Williamson PC, Heo G, Varnhagen C, Major PW. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(4):485-91.
8. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid GR, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(3):298-303.
9. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and threedimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(3):301-6.
10. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):16.e1-4.
11. Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(4):431-4.
12. Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischer A. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11(2):90-5.
13. Houston WJB. The analysis of error in orthodontics measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(5):382-90.
14. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impression to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod. 2009;36(1):36-41.
15. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(2):259-65.
16. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Manual and computer-aided apace analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(6):676-80.
17. Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20(10):1093-101.
18. Aguiar RM, Freitas BV. Confiabilidade da análise de Moyers em indivíduos de São Luís-MA. Ortho Sci Orthod Sci Pract. 2008;1(2):147-52.
19. Jedlinska A. The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2008;54(2):106-13.
20. Bishara SE, Jakobson JR. Comparison of two non radiographic methods of predicting permanent tooth size in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(5):573-6.
21. nikTahere H, Majid S, Fateme M, Kharazi F, Javad M. Predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars of the maxillary and mandibular quadrants in an Iranian population. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;32(1):43-7.
22. Arslan SG, Dildes, N, Kama JD, Genc C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod. 2009;10(2):135-40.
23. Melgaço CA, Araújo MT, Ruellas AC. Applicability of three tooth size prediction methods for white Brasilians. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):644-9.