Bioprospecting bacterial and fungal volatiles for sustainable agriculture

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 206-211

  Kanchiswamy, Chidananda Nagamangala ^a   Malnoy, Mickael ^a   Maffei, Massimo E ^b  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Microbial volatile organic compounds; Plant growth promotion; Plant protection; Plant microbe interactions; Sustainable agriculture

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AGRICULTURE; BACTERIUM; BIOPROSPECTING; CHEMISTRY; FUNGUS; PLANT DEVELOPMENT;

AGRICULTURE; BACTERIA; BIOPROSPECTING; FUNGI; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84926418280     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.004     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Chaparro J.M., et al. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 2014, 8:790-803.
2. Schreiter S., et al. Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5:144.
3. Bennett A.E., Bever J.D. Mycorrhizal species differentially alter plant growth and response to herbivory. Ecology 2007, 88:210-218.
4. Hol W.H., et al. Reduction of rare soil microbes modifies plant-herbivore interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:292-301.
5. Behie S.W., et al. Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science 2012, 336:1576-1577.
6. Nadeem S.M., et al. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32:429-448.
7. Piechulla B., Degenhardt J. The emerging importance of microbial volatile organic compounds. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 37:811-812.
8. Ortiz-Castro R., et al. Transkingdom signaling based on bacterial cyclodipeptides with auxin activity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:7253-7258.
9. Ortiz-Castro R., et al. The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4:701-712.
10. Ortiz-Castro R., et al. N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones: a class of bacterial quorum-sensing signals alter post-embryonic root development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:1497-1509.
11. Ortiz-Castro R., et al. Plant growth promotion by Bacillus megaterium involves cytokinin signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3:263-265.
12. Ryu C.M., et al. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134:1017-1026.
13. Ryu C.M., et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:4927-4932.
14. Effmert U., et al. Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38:665-703.
15. Shannon U., et al. Fungal volatile organic compounds: a review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2012, 26:73-83.
16. Junker R.R., Tholl D. Volatile organic compound mediated interactions at the plant-microbe interface. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39:810-825.
17. Bitas V., et al. Sniffing on microbes: diverse roles of microbial volatile organic compounds in plant health. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26:835-843.
18. Singh S.K., et al. An endophytic Phomopsis sp. possessing bioactivity and fuel potential with its volatile organic compounds. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61:729-739.
19. Strobel G., et al. An endophytic/pathogenic Phoma sp. from creosote bush producing biologically active volatile compounds having fuel potential. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 320:87-94.
20. Chernin L., et al. Quorum-sensing quenching by rhizobacterial volatiles. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3:698-704.
21. Park H.B., et al. One shot-two pathogens blocked: exposure of Arabidopsis to hexadecane, a long chain volatile organic compound, confers induced resistance against both Pectobacterium carotovorum and Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8:e24619.
22. Song G.C., Ryu C.M. Two volatile organic compounds trigger plant self-defense against a bacterial pathogen and a sucking insect in cucumber under open field conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14:9803-9819.
23. Kwon Y.S., et al. Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to bacterial volatiles. Planta 2010, 232:1355-1370.
24. Cho S.M., et al. 2R,3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21:1067-1075.
25. Bailly A., Weisskopf L. The modulating effect of bacterial volatiles on plant growth: current knowledge and future challenges. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7:79-85.
26. Bennett J.W., et al. 18 Fungal and bacterial volatile organic compounds: an overview and their role as ecological signaling agents. Fungal Associations 2012, Vol. 9:373-393. Springer.
27. Vespermann, et al. Rhizobacterial volatiles affect the growth of fungi and Arabidopsis thaliana. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:5639-5641.
28. Kai M., et al. Bacterial volatiles and their action potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 81:1001-1012.
29. Penuelas J., et al. Biogenic volatile emissions from the soil. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37:1866-1891.
30. Farag M.A., et al. GC-MS SPME profiling of rhizobacterial volatiles reveals prospective inducers of growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in plants. Phytochemistry 2006, 67:2262-2268.
31. Han S.H., et al. GacS-dependent production of 2R,3R-butanediol by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is a major determinant for eliciting systemic resistance against Erwinia carotovora but not against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci in tobacco. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19:924-930.
32. Zhang H., et al. Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21:737-744.
33. Wenke K., et al. Volatiles of two growth-inhibiting rhizobacteria commonly engage AtWRKY18 function. Plant J. 2012, 70:445-459.
34. Zhang H., et al. Rhizobacterial volatile emissions regulate auxin homeostasis and cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Planta 2007, 226:839-851.
35. Zhang H., et al. Soil bacteria augment Arabidopsis photosynthesis by decreasing glucose sensing and abscisic acid levels in planta. Plant J. 2008, 56:264-273.
36. Hung R., et al. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for testing the effect of Trichoderma volatile organic compounds. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6:19-26.
37. Kishimoto K., et al. Volatile 1-octen-3-ol induces a defensive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2007, 73:35-37.
38. Contreras-Cornejo H., et al. The 4-phosphopantetheinyl transferase of Trichoderma virens plays a role in plant protection against Botrytis cinerea through volatile organic compound emission. Plant Soil 2014, 379:261-274.
39. Ezquer I., et al. Microbial volatile emissions promote accumulation of exceptionally high levels of starch in leaves in mono- and dicotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51:1674-1693.
40. Minerdi D., et al. Volatile organic compounds: a potential direct long-distance mechanism for antagonistic action of Fusarium oxysporum strain MSA 35. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11:844-854.
41. Minerdi D., et al. Fusarium oxysporum and its bacterial consortium promote lettuce growth and expansin A5 gene expression through microbial volatile organic compound (MVOC) emission. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 76:342-351.
42. Splivallo R., et al. Truffle volatiles inhibit growth and induce an oxidative burst in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2007, 175:417-424.
43. Cortes-Barco A.M., et al. Comparison of induced resistance activated by benzothiadiazole, (2R,3R)-butanediol and an isoparaffin mixture against anthracnose of Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Pathol. 2010, 59:643-653.
44. Cortes-Barco A.M., et al. Induced systemic resistance against three foliar diseases of Agrostis stolonifera by (2R,3R)-butanediol or an isoparaffin mixture. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 157:179-189.
45. Fialho M.B., et al. Antimicrobial volatile organic compounds affect morphogenesis-related enzymes in Guignardia citricarpa, causal agent of citrus black spot. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2011, 21:797-807.
46. Fialho M., et al. Volatile organic compounds produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibit the in vitro development of Guignardia citricarpa, the causal agent of citrus black spot. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26:925-932.
47. Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C., et al. Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 32:62-64.
48. Glare T., et al. Have biopesticides come of age?. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30:250-258.
49. Wilson K., et al. Pest control: biopesticides' potential. Science 2013, 342:799.
50. Velázquez-Becerra C., et al. A volatile organic compound analysis from Arthrobacter agilis identifies dimethylhexadecylamine, an amino-containing lipid modulating bacterial growth and Medicago sativa morphogenesis in vitro. Plant Soil 2011, 339:329-340.
51. Zou C., et al. Bacillus megaterium strain XTBG34 promotes plant growth by producing 2-pentylfuran. J. Microbiol. 2010, 48:460-466.
52. Wheatley R.E., et al. The consequences of volatile organic compound mediated bacterial and fungal interactions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81:357-364.
53. Scholler C.E., et al. Volatile metabolites from actinomycetes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50:2615-2621.
54. Funes H., et al. Comparison of three types of traps baited with sexual pheromones for ambrosia beetle Megaplatypus mutatus (Coleoptera: Platypodinae) in poplar plantations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102:1546-1550.
55. Manrique G., et al. Chemical communication in Chagas disease vectors. Source, identity, and potential function of volatiles released by the metasternal and Brindley's glands of Triatoma infestans adults. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32:2035-2052.
56. Vitta A.C., Lorenzo M.G. Copulation and mate guarding behavior in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46:789-795.
57. Bukovinszky T., et al. Variation in plant volatiles and attraction of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Hellen). J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31:461-480.
58. Strobel G.A., et al. Volatile antimicrobials from Muscodor albus, a novel endophytic fungus. Microbiology 2001, 147:2943-2950.
59. Mercier J., Jiménez J.I. Control of fungal decay of apples and peaches by the biofumigant fungus Muscodor albus. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 31:1-8.
60. Mitchell A.M., et al. Volatile antimicrobials from Muscodor crispans, a novel endophytic fungus. Microbiology 2010, 156:270-277.
61. Macias-Rubalcava M.L., et al. Allelochemical effects of volatile compounds and organic extracts from Muscodor yucatanensis, a tropical endophytic fungus from Bursera simaruba. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36:1122-1131.
62. Blom D., et al. Volatile-mediated killing of Arabidopsis thaliana by bacteria is mainly due to hydrogen cyanide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:1000-1008.
63. Åström B., Gerhardson B. Wheat cultivar reactions to deleterious rhizosphere bacteria under gnotobiotic conditions. Plant Soil 1989, 117:157-165.
64. Gutiérrez-Luna F., et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria modulate root-system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana through volatile organic compound emission. Symbiosis 2010, 51:75-83.
65. Blom D., et al. Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13:3047-3058.
66. Thakeow P., et al. Antennal and behavioral responses of Cis boleti to fungal odor of Trametes gibbosa. Chem. Senses 2008, 33:379-387.
67. Drilling K., Dettner K. Electrophysiological responses of four fungivorous Coleoptera to volatiles of Trametes versicolor: implications for host selection. Chemoecology 2009, 19:109-115.