Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course

Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages 415-425

  Moffett, Jenny ^a,c   Mill, Aileen C ^b  

^a School of Veterinary Medicine   (Saint Kitts and Nevis)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Active learning; Assessment; Didactic; Flipped classroom; Lecture; Professional skills; Student perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926348549     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11797258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S70160     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tucker B. The flipped classroom. Educ Next. 2012;12(1):82–83.
2. Bishop JL, Verleger MA. The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference; June 23–36, 2013; Atlanta, USA.
3. McLaughlin JE, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, et al. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(9):196.
4. Wagner D, Laforge P, Cripps D. Lecture material retention: A first trial report on flipped classroom strategies in electronic systems engineering at the University of Regina. Proceedings of the 2013 Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference; June 17–20, 2013; Montréal, Canada.
5. Braun I, Ritter S, Vasko M. Inverted classroom by topic: a study in mathematics for electrical engineering students. iJEP. 2014;4(3):11–17.
6. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93:223–231.
7. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236–243.
8. Herreid CF, Schiller NA. Case studies and the flipped classroom. J Coll Sci Teach. 2013;42(5):62–66.
9. Strayer JF. The Effects of the Classroom Flip on the Learning Environment: A Comparison of Learning Activity in a Traditional Classroom and a Flip Classroom that Used an Intelligent Tutoring System [PhD thesis]. Columbus, OH, USA: The Ohio State University; 2007.
10. Talbert R. Inverting the linear algebra classroom. PRIMUS. 2014;24(5): 361–374.
11. Pierce R, Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a ‘flipped classroom’ model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76:1–5.
12. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
13. Broomfield D, Bligh J. An evaluation of the ‘short form’ course experience questionnaire with medical students. Med Educ. 1998;32: 367–369.
14. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(Suppl 9):S63–S67.
15. Hancock GR. Cognitive complexity and the comparability of multiple-choice and constructed response test formats. J Exp Educ. 1994;62:143–157.
16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
17. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 28 March, 2014.
18. Bryer J, Speerschneider K. Likert: Functions to analyze and visualize likert type items; 2013. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=likert. Accessed 28 March, 2014.
19. Wickham H. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. J Stat Softw. 2011;40(1):1–29.
20. Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31(1):30–43.
21. Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C. Improved learning in a largeenrollment physics class. Science. 2011;332(6031):862–864.