ATPase-Dependent Control of the Mms21 SUMO Ligase during DNA Repair

PLoS Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Bermúdez López, Marcelino ^a   Pociño Merino, Irene ^a   Sánchez, Humberto ^b   Bueno, Andrés ^a   Guasch, Clàudia ^a   Almedawar, Seba ^a   Bru Virgili, Sergi ^c   Garí, Eloi ^a   Wyman, Claire ^b   Reverter, David ^c   Colomina, Neus ^a   Torres Rosell, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; COHESIN; HETERODIMER; LIGASE; PROTEIN MMS21; PROTEIN SMC5; PROTEIN SMC6; PROTEIN UBC9; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; FUNGAL DNA; MMS21 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SMC5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SMC6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYME UBC9;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOMES AND CHROMOSOMAL PHENOMENA; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME REGULATION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SISTER CHROMATID DISJUNCTION; SUMOYLATION; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATID; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIDS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES;

EID: 84926308672     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002089     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Wu N, Yu H, (2012) The Smc complexes in DNA damage response. Cell Biosci 2: 5. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-2-5 22369641
2. Hirano T, (2006) At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev cell Biol 7: 311–322. 16633335
3. Anderson DE, Losada A, Erickson HP, Hirano T, (2002) Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J Cell Biol 156: 419–424. 11815634
4. Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K, (2002) Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol Cell 9: 773–788. 11983169
5. Melby TE, Ciampaglio CN, Briscoe G, Erickson HP, (1998) The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge. J Cell Biol 142: 1595–1604. 9744887
6. Van Noort J, van Der Heijden T, de Jager M, Wyman C, Kanaar R, et al. (2003) The coiled-coil of the human Rad50 DNA repair protein contains specific segments of increased flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7581–7586. 12805565
7. Cuylen S, Metz J, Haering CH, (2011) Condensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 894–901. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2087 21765419
8. Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K, (2003) Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 112: 765–777. 12654244
9. Nasim A, Smith BP, (1975) Genetic control of radiation sensitivity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 79: 573–582. 166019
10. Bermudez-Lopez M, Ceschia A, de Piccoli G, Colomina N, Pasero P, et al. (2010) The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 6502–6512. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq546 20571088
11. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao XL, Maeda D, et al. (2006) Ubc9-and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509–522. 17081974
12. Chavez A, George V, Agrawal V, Johnson FB, (2010) Sumoylation and the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex slow senescence through recombination intermediate resolution. J Biol Chem 285: 11922–11930. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.041277 20159973
13. Chen YH, Choi K, Szakal B, Arenz J, Duan X, et al. (2009) Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21252–21257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908258106 19995966
14. De Piccoli G, Cortes-Ledesma F, Ira G, Torres-Rosell J, Uhle S, et al. (2006) Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1032–U118. 16892052
15. Potts PR, Porteus MH, Yu HT, (2006) Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J 25: 3377–3388. 16810316
16. Sollier J, Driscoll R, Castellucci F, Foiani M, Jackson SP, et al. (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1671–1682. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0875 19158389
17. Wehrkamp-Richter S, Hyppa RW, Prudden J, Smith GR, Boddy MN, (2012) Meiotic DNA joint molecule resolution depends on Nse5-Nse6 of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 9633–9646. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks713 22855558
18. Copsey A, Tang S, Jordan PW, Blitzblau HG, Newcombe S, et al. (2013) Smc5/6 coordinates formation and resolution of joint molecules with chromosome morphology to ensure meiotic divisions. PLoS Genet 9: e1004071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004071 24385939
19. Xaver M, Huang L, Chen D, Klein F, (2013) Smc5/6-mms21 prevents and eliminates inappropriate recombination intermediates in meiosis. PLoS Genet 9: e1004067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004067 24385936
20. De Piccoli G, Torres-Rosell J, Aragon L, (2009) The unnamed complex: what do we know about Smc5-Smc6?. Chromosome Res 17: 251–263. doi: 10.1007/s10577-008-9016-8 19308705
21. Duan X, Yang Y, Chen YH, Arenz J, Rangi GK, et al. (2009) Architecture of the Smc5/6 Complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reveals a Unique Interaction between the Nse5-6 Subcomplex and the Hinge Regions of Smc5 and Smc6. J Biol Chem 284: 8507–8515. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809139200 19141609
22. Palecek J, Vidot S, Feng M, Doherty AJ, Lehmann AR, (2006) The Smc5-Smc6 DNA repair complex—Bridging of the Smc5-Smc6 heads by the kleisin, Nse4, and non-kleisin subunits. J Biol Chem 281: 36952–36959. 17005570
23. Doyle JM, Gao J, Wang J, Yang M, Potts PR, (2010) MAGE-RING protein complexes comprise a family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell 39: 963–974. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.029 20864041
24. Duan X, Sarangi P, Liu X, Rangi GK, Zhao X, et al. (2009) Article Structural and Functional Insights into the Roles of the Mms21 Subunit of the Smc5 / 6 Complex. Mol Cell 35: 657–668. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.032 19748359
25. Zhao XL, Blobel G, (2005) A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4777–4782. 15738391
26. Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR, et al. (2005) Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 185–196. 15601841
27. Potts PR, Yu HT, (2005) Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7021–7032. 16055714
28. Meulmeester E, Melchior F, (2008) Cell biology: SUMO. Nature 452: 709–711. doi: 10.1038/452709a 18401402
29. Pebernard S, Schaffer L, Campbell D, Head SR, Boddy MN, (2008) Localization of Smc5/6 to centromeres and telomeres requires heterochromatin and SUMO, respectively. EMBO J 27: 3011–3023. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.220 18923417
30. Bergink S, Jentsch S, (2009) Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458: 461–467. doi: 10.1038/nature07963 19325626
31. Watts FZ, Skilton A, Ho JCY, Boyd LK, Trickey MAM, et al. (2007) The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe SUMO ligases in genome stability. Biochem Soc Trans 35: 1379–1384. 18031226
32. Stephan AK, Kliszczak M, Morrison CG, (2011) The Nse2 / Mms21 SUMO ligase of the Smc5 / 6 complex in the maintenance of genome stability. FEBS Lett 585: 2907–2913. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.067 21550342
33. Takahashi Y, Dulev S, Liu X, Hiller NJ, Zhao X, et al. (2008) Cooperation of sumoylated chromosomal proteins in rDNA maintenance. PLoS Genet 4: e1000215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000215 18846224
34. Almedawar S, Colomina N, Bermudez-Lopez M, Pocino-Merino I, Torres-Rosell J, (2012) A SUMO-dependent step during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol 22: 1576–1581. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.046 22771040
35. Wu N, Kong X, Ji Z, Zeng W, Potts PR, et al. (2012) Scc1 sumoylation by Mms21 promotes sister chromatid recombination through counteracting Wapl. Genes Dev 26: 1473–1485. doi: 10.1101/gad.193615.112 22751501
36. McAleenan A, Cordon-Preciado V, Clemente-Blanco A, Liu IC, Sen N, et al. (2012) SUMOylation of the alpha-kleisin subunit of cohesin is required for DNA damage-induced cohesion. Curr Biol 22: 1564–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.045 22771042
37. Bustard DE, Menolfi D, Jeppsson K, Ball LG, Dewey SC, et al. (2012) During replication stress, non-SMC element 5 (NSE5) is required for Smc5/6 protein complex functionality at stalled forks. J Biol Chem 287: 11374–11383. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.336263 22303010
38. Roy MA, Siddiqui N, D’Amours D, (2011) Dynamic and selective DNA-binding activity of Smc5, a core component of the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Cell Cycle 10: 690–700. 21293191
39. Sakai A, Hizume K, Sutani T, Takeyasu K, Yanagida M, (2003) Condensin but not cohesin SMC heterodimer induces DNA reannealing through protein-protein assembly. EMBO J 22: 2764–2775. 12773391
40. Yoshimura SH, Hizume K, Murakami A, Sutani T, Takeyasu K, et al. (2002) Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA: regulatory non-SMC subunits bind to the head of SMC heterodimer. Curr Biol 12: 508–513. 11909539
41. McDonald WH, Pavlova Y, Yates JR, Boddy MN, (2003) Novel essential DNA repair proteins Nse1 and Nse2 are subunits of the fission yeast Smc5-Smc6 complex. J Biol Chem 278: 45460–45467. 12966087
42. Ulrich HD, (2014) Two-way communications between ubiquitin-like modifiers and DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 317–324. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2805 24699080
43. Johnson ES, Gupta AA, (2001) An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106: 735–744. 11572779
44. Reverter D, Lima CD, (2005) Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO-RanGAP1-Ubc9-Nup358 complex. Nature 435: 687–692. 15931224
45. Yunus AA, Lima CD, (2009) Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 and determinants required for SUMO modification of PCNA. Mol Cell 35: 669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.013 19748360
46. Mc Intyre J, Muller EGD, Weitzer S, Snydsman BE, Davis TN, et al. (2007) In vivo analysis of cohesin architecture using FRET in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 26: 3783–3793. 17660750
47. Hu B, Itoh T, Mishra A, Katoh Y, Chan KL, et al. (2011) ATP hydrolysis is required for relocating cohesin from sites occupied by its Scc2/4 loading complex. Curr Biol 21: 12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.004 21185190
48. Carter AP, Garbarino JE, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Shipley WE, Cho C, et al. (2008) Structure and functional role of dynein’s microtubule-binding domain. Science 322: 1691–1695. doi: 10.1126/science.1164424 19074350
49. Kinoshita E, van der Linden E, Sanchez H, Wyman C, (2009) RAD50, an SMC family member with multiple roles in DNA break repair: how does ATP affect function?. Chromosome Res 17: 277–288. doi: 10.1007/s10577-008-9018-6 19308707
50. Hopfner KP, Karcher A, Shin DS, Craig L, Arthur LM, et al. (2000) Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily. Cell 101: 789–800. 10892749
51. Gruber S, Arumugam P, Katou Y, Kuglitsch D, Helmhart W, et al. (2006) Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 127: 523–537. 17081975
52. Arumugam P, Nishino T, Haering CH, Gruber S, Nasmyth K, (2006) Cohesin’s ATPase activity is stimulated by the C-terminal winged-helix domain of its kleisin subunit. Curr Biol 16: 1998–2008. 17055978
53. Hazbun TR, Malmström L, Anderson S, Graczyk BJ, Fox B, et al. (2003) Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol Cell 12: 1353–1365. 14690591
54. Goldstein AL, McCusker JH, (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553. 10514571
55. Janke C, Magiera MM, Rathfelder N, Taxis C, Reber S, et al. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21: 947–962. 15334558
56. Nishimura K, Fukagawa T, Takisawa H, Kakimoto T, Kanemaki M, (2009) An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat Methods 6: 917–922. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1401 19915560
57. Liang C, Stillman B, (1997) Persistent initiation of DNA replication and chromatin-bound MCM proteins during the cell cycle in cdc6 mutants. Genes Dev 11: 3375–3386. 9407030
58. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J, (1991) Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252: 1162–1164. 2031185