Training parsers on incompatible treebanks

NAACL HLT 2013 - 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 127-137

  Johansson, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ADAPTATION METHODS; DEPENDENCY PARSER; FEATURE REPRESENTATION; FEATURE-BASED; SIMPLE++; SMALL TRAINING; STATISTICAL PARSER; SWEDISHS; TRAINING SETS; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84926191806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Shai Ben-David, John Blitzer, Koby Crammer, Alex Kulesza, Fernando Pereira, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2010. A theory of learning from different domains. Machine Learning, 2010(79):151-175.
2. John Blitzer, Mark Dredze, and Fernando Pereira. 2007. Biographies, Bollywood, Boom-boxes and Blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Asso-ciation of Computational Linguistics, pages 440-447, Prague, Czech Republic.
3. Cristina Bosco and Alberto Lavelli. 2010. Annotation schema oriented validation for dependency parsing evaluation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT9), Tartu, Estonia.
4. Cristina Bosco, Simonetta Montemagni, Alessandro Mazzei, Vincenzo Lombardo, Felice Dell'Orletta, Alessandro Lenci, Leonardo Lesmo, GiuseppeAttardi, Maria Simi, Alberto Lavelli, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson, and Joakim Nivre. 2010. Comparing the influence of different treebank annotations on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), pages 1794-1801, Valletta, Malta.
5. Sabine Brants, Stefanie Dipper, Silvia Hansen,Wolfgang Lezius, and George Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theory, pages 24-41, Sozopol, Bulgaria.
6. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computa-tional Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 149-164, New York City, United States.
7. Xavier Carreras. 2007. Experiments with a higher-order projective dependency parser. In Proceedings the CoNLL Shared Task, pages 957-961, Prague, Czech Republic.
8. Rich Caruana. 1997. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41-75.
9. Hal Daumé III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256-263, Prague, Czech Republic.
10. Jan Einarsson. 1976. Talbankens skriftspr akskonkordans. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.
11. Sofia Gustafson-Capková and Britt Hartmann. 2006. Manual of the Stockholm Umea Corpus version 2. 0. Stockholm University.
12. Richard Hudson. 1984. Word Grammar. Blackwell.
13. Jerker Järborg. 1986. Manual f ör syntaggning. Department of Linguistic Computation, University of Gothenburg.
14. Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2007. Extended constituent-to-dependency conversion for English. In NODALIDA 2007 Conference Proceedings, pages 105-112, Tartu, Estonia.
15. Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2008. The effect of syntactic representation on semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Con-ference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 393-400,Manchester, United Kingdom.
16. Richard Johansson. 2013. Bridging the gap between two Swedish treebanks. Northern European Journal of Language Technology. Submitted.
17. Zhenghua Li, Ting Liu, and Wanxiang Che. 2012. Exploiting multiple treebanks for parsing with quasisynchronous grammars. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 675-684, Jeju Island, Korea.
18. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
19. Andŕe F. T. Martins, Dipanjan Das, Noah A. Smith, and Eric P. Xing. 2008. Stacking dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 157-166, Honolulu, United States.
20. Ryan McDonald and Joakim Nivre. 2007. Characterizing the errors of data-driven dependency parsing models. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process-ing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 122-131, Prague, Czech Republic.
21. Ryan McDonald, Koby Crammer, and Fernando Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proceedings of 43rd AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 91-98, Ann Arbor, United States.
22. Simonetta Montemagni and Maria Simi. 2007. The Italian dependency annotated corpus developed for the CoNLL-2007 shared task. Technical report, ILCCNR.
23. Simonetta Montemagni, Francesco Barsotti, Marco Battista, Nicoletta Calzolari, Ornella Corazzari, Alessandro Lenci, Antonio Zampolli, Francesca Fanciulli, Maria Massetani, Remo Raffaelli, Roberto Basili, Maria Teresa Pazienza, Dario Saracino, Fabio Zanzotto, Nadia Mana, Fabio Pianesi, and Rodolfo Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank. In Anne Abeillé, editor, Building and Using Syntactically Annotated Corpora. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
24. Jens Nilsson, Johan Hall, and Joakim Nivre. 2005. MAMBA meets TIGER: Reconstructing a Swedish treebank from antiquity. In Proceedings of NODAL-IDA Special Session on Treebanks.
25. Jens Nilsson, Joakim Nivre, and Johan Hall. 2007. Generalizing tree transformations for inductive dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguis-tics, pages 968-975, Prague, Czech Republic.
26. Zheng-Yu Niu, Haifeng Wang, and Hua Wu. 2009. Exploiting heterogeneous treebanks for parsing. In Pro-ceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 46-54, Suntec, Singapore.
27. Joakim Nivre and Ryan McDonald. 2008. Integrating graph-based and transition-based dependency parsers. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 950-958, Columbus, United States.
28. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, Sandra Kübler, Ryan Mc-Donald, Jens Nilsson, Sebastian Riedel, and Deniz Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the CoNLL Shared Task Session of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007, pages 915-932, Prague, Czech Republic.
29. Joakim Nivre. 2002. What kinds of trees grow in Swedish soil? A comparison of four annotation schemes for Swedish. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT2002), Sozopol, Bulgaria.
30. Helmut Schmid. 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of Interna-tional Conference on New Methods in Language Pro-cessing, Manchester, United Kingdom.
31. David A. Smith and Jason Eisner. 2009. Parser adaptation and projection with quasi-synchronous grammar features. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 822-831, Suntec, Singapore.
32. Mihai Surdeanu, Richard Johansson, Adam Meyers, LlúsMàrquez, and JoakimNivre. 2008. The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies. In CoNLL 2008: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Natural Language Learn-ing, pages 159-177,Manchester, United Kingdom.
33. Heike Telljohann, Erhard Hinrichs, and Sandra Kbler. 2004. The Tüba-D/Z treebank: Annotating German with a context-free backbone. In In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Re-sources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), pages 2229-2235.