Dialysis modality decision-making for older adults with chronic kidney disease

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 23, Issue 23-24, 2014, Pages 3378-3390

  Harwood, Lori ^a,b,c   Clark, Alexander M ^b  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Critical realism; Decision making; Home dialysis

Indexed keywords

AGED; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; NURSING; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; RENAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 84926154501     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12582     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bhaskar R (1975) A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester, Brighton.
2. Blake P (2000) Trends in patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis and strategies: how are we doing and how can we do better. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy 7, 324-337.
3. Brown E (2011) How to address barriers to peritoneal dialysis in the elderly. Peritoneal Dialysis International 31, S83-S85.
4. Brown E & Johansson L (2011) Dialysis options for end-stage renal disease in older people. Nephron. Clinical Practice 119, c10-c13.
5. Carson R, Juszczak M, Davenport A & Burns A (2009) Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 4, 1611-1619.
6. Chandna S, DaSilva-Gane M, Marshall C, Warwicker P, Greenwood R & Farrington K (2011) Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 26, 1608-1614.
7. Chanouzas D, Ng K, Fallouh B & Baharani J (2012) What influences patient choice of treatment modality at the pre-dialysis stage? Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 27, 1542-1547.
8. Cheng C, Shu K, Chuang Y, Huang S, Chou M & Chang H (2013) Clinical outcome of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients with assisted care in a single medical centre: a 25 years experience. Nephrology 18, 468-473.
9. Chiou C & Chung Y (2011) Effectiveness of multimedia interactive patient education on knowledge, uncertainty and decision-making in patients with end-stage renal disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing 21, 1223-1231.
10. CIHI (2013) Canadian organ replacement registry annual report: treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada 2002-2011. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Available at: www.cihi.ca/corr (accessed 25 February 2014).
11. Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, Segall L, Heimburger O, vanBiesen W, Fouque D & Vanholder R (2010) Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advise from the European renal best practice (ERBP) advisory board. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25, 3124-3130.
12. Davison S (2010) End-of-life care preferences and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 5, 195-204.
13. Derrett S, Darmody M, Williams S, Rutherford M, Schollum J & Walker R (2010) Older peoples' satisfaction with home-based dialysis. Nephrology 15, 464-470.
14. Elliott M, Tam-Tham H & Hemmelgarn B (2013) Age and treatment of kidney failure. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 22, 344-350.
15. Franco M, Fernandes N, Ribeiro C, Qureshi A, Divino-Filtho J & Lima M (2013) A Brazilian experience in assisted automated peritoneal dialysis: a reliable and effective home care approach. Peritoneal Dialysis International 33, 252-258.
16. Gomez C, Valido P, Celadilla O, de Quiros A & Mojon M (1999) Validity of a standard information protocol provided to end-stage renal disease patients and its effect on treatment selection. Peritoneal Dialysis International 19, 471-477.
17. Goovaerts T, Jadoul M & Goffin E (2005) Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 20, 1842-1847.
18. Hanko J, Jastrzebski J, Nieva C, White C, Li G & Zalunardo N (2010) Dedication of a nurse to educating suboptimal haemodialysis starts improved transition to independent modalities of renal replacement therapy. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 26, 2302-2308.
19. Harwood L & Clark A (2012a) Understanding health decisions using critical realism: home-dialysis decision-making during chronic kidney disease. Nursing Inquiry 19, 29-38.
20. Harwood L & Clark A (2012b) Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 50, 109-120.
21. Harwood L & Leitch R (2006) Home dialysis therapies. In Contemporary Nephrology Nursing: Principles and Practices, 2nd edn (Molzahn A & Butera E eds). American Nephrology Nurses Association, Pitman, NJ, pp. 605-626.
22. Harwood L, Wilson B, Locking-Cusolito H, Spittal J & Sontrop J (2009) Stressors and chronic kidney disease. Nephrology Nursing Journal 36, 265-276.
23. Harwood L, Wilson B & Sontrop J (2011) Sociodemographic differences in stressful experience and coping amongst adults with chronic kidney disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67, 1779-1789.
24. Heaf J, Lokkegaard H & Madsen M (2002) Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 17, 112-117.
25. Jager K, Korevaar J, Dekker F, Krediet R & Boeschoten E (2004) The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in the Netherlands. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 43, 891-899.
26. Jiwakanon S, Chiu Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K & Mehrotra R (2010) Peritoneal dialysis: an underutilized modality. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 19, 573-577.
27. Joly D, Anglicheau D, Alberti C, Nguyen A, Touam M, Grunfeld J & Jungers P (2003) Octogenarians reaching end-stage renal disease: cohort study of decision-making and clinical outcomes. Journal of American Society of Nephrology 14, 1012-1021.
28. Jung B, Blake P, Mehrotra R & Mendelssohn D (1999) Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study. Peritoneal Dialysis International 19, 263-268.
29. Kaufman S, Shim J & Russ A (2006) Old age, life extent and the character of medical choice. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61, S175-S184.
30. Kelly J, Stanley M & Harris D (2005) Acceptance onto dialysis guidelines: predialysis education. In The CARI Guidelines-Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Available at: www.cari.org.au (accessed 25 February 2014).
31. Klang B, Bjorvell H & Clyne N (1999) Predialysis education helps patients choose dialysis modality and increases disease-specific knowledge. Journal of Advanced Nursing 29, 869-876.
32. Lacson L, Wang W, DeVries C, Leste K, Hakim R, Lazarus R & Pulliam J (2011) Effects of a nationwide predialysis educational program on modality choice, vascular access, and patient outcomes. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 58, 235-242.
33. Lenci L & Campbell J (2012) Peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients. Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis 28, 79-83.
34. Levin A, Hemmelgarn B, Culleton B, Tobe S, McFarlane P, Ruzicka M, Burns K, Manns B, White C, Madore F, Moist L, Klarenbach S, Barrett B, Foley R, Jindal K, Senior P, Pannce N, Shurraw S, Akbari C, Cohn A, Reslerova M, Deved V, Mendelssohn D, Nesrallah G, Kappel J & Tonelli M (2008) Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease. Canadian Medical Association Journal 179, 1154-1162.
35. Luijtgaarden M, Noordzij M, Stel V, Ravani P, Jarraya F, Collart F, Schon S, Leivestad T, Puttinger H, Wanner C & Jager K (2011) Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 26, 2940-2947.
36. Manns B, Taub K, VanderStraeten C, Jones H, Mills C, Visser M & McLaughlin K (2005) The impact of education on chronic kidney disease patients' plans to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis: a randomized trial. Kidney International 68, 1777-1783.
37. Marron B, Ortiz A, de Sequera P, Martin-Reyes G, de Arriba G, Lamas J, Martinez Ocana J, Arrieta J & Martinez F (2006) Impact of end-stage renal disease care in planned dialysis start and type of renal replacement therapy - a Spanish multicentre experience. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 21, ii51-ii55.
38. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G, Hons R & Taub K (2003) Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 41, 380-385.
39. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, Peters V & Nissenson A (2005) Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-centre hemodialysis. Kidney International 68, 378-390.
40. Mehrotra R, Yi-Wen C, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bargman J & Vonesh E (2011) Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 171, 110-118.
41. Mendelssohn D, Mullaney S, Jung B, Blake P & Mehta R (2001) What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection? American Journal of Kidney Diseases 37, 22-29.
42. Mishel M (1988) Uncertainty in illness. Image - The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 20, 225-231.
43. Molzahn A, Bruce A & Sheilds L (2008) Learning from stories of people with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology Nursing Journal 35, 13-20.
44. Morse J, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K & Spiers J (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1, 13-22.
45. Morton R, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P & Webster A (2010) The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. British Medical Journal 340, C122.
46. Mowatt G, Vale L, Perez J, Wyness L, Fraser C, MacLeod A, Daly C & Stearns S (2003) Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of home versus hospital or satellite unit haemodialysis for people with end-stage renal disease. Health Technology Assessment 7, 1-174.
47. Murphy S, Foley R & Barrett B (2000) Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Kidney International 57, 1720-1726.
48. Murray M, Brunier G, Chung J, Craig L, Mills C, Thomas A & Stacey D (2009) A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease. Patient Education and Counseling 76, 149-158.
49. Murtagh F, March J, Donohoe P, Ekbal N, Sheerin N & Harris F (2007) Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 22, 1955-1962.
50. Namiki S, Rowe J & Cooke M (2009) Living with home-based haemodialysis: insights from older people. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19, 547-555.
51. Nesrallah G (2006) Modality options for renal replacement therapy: the integrated care concept revisited. Hemodialysis International 10, 143-151.
52. NKF (2006) National Kidney Foundation-KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 48, S1-S332.
53. Oliver M, Quinn R, Richardson E, Kiss A, Lamping D & Manns B (2007) Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International 71, 673-678.
54. Oliver M, Garg A, Blake P, Johnson J, Verrelli M, Zacharias J, Pandeya S & Quinn R (2010) The impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25, 2737-2744.
55. Pagels A, Wang M & Wengstrom Y (2008) The impact of a nurse-led clinic on self-care ability, disease-specific knowledge, and home dialysis modality. Nephrology Nursing Journal 35, 242-248.
56. Pawson R & Tilley N (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Sage Publications, London.
57. Porter S & Ryan S (1996) Breaking the boundaries between nursing and sociology: a critical realist ethnography of the theory-practice gap. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 413-420.
58. RNAO (2009) Decision Support for Adults Living with Chronic Kidney Disease. Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON.
59. RPA (2010) Shared Decision-Making in the Appropriate Initiation of Withdrawal from Dialysis. Renal Physicians Association, Rockville, MD.
60. Russ A & Kaufman S (2012) Discernment rather than decision-making among elderly dialysis patients. Seminars in Dialysis 25, 31-32.
61. Sayer A (2000) Realism and Social Science. Sage Publications, London.
62. Schell J, Patel U, Steinhauser K, Ammarell N & Tulsky J (2012) Discussions of the kidney disease trajectory by elderly patients and nephrologists: a qualitative study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 59, 495-503.
63. Smith C, DaSilva-Gane M, Chanda S, Warwicker P, Greenwood R & Farrington K (2003) Choosing not to dialyse: evaluation of planned non-dialytic management in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure. Nephron 95, 40-46.
64. Stack AG (2002) Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a National study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 13, 1279-1287.
65. Stringer S & Baharani J (2011) Why did I start dialysis? A qualitative study on views and expectations from an elderly cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure starting haemodialysis in the United Kingdom. International Urology and Nephrology 44, 295-300.
66. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar J, Dekker F, Van Manen J, Boeschoten E & Krediet R (2003) Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of the Netherlands cooperative study on the adequacy of dialysis 2. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 14, 2851-2860.
67. Tong A, Sainsbury P & Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349-357.
68. USRDS (2013) United States Renal Data System 2013 Annual Report. The National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD.
69. Visser A, Dijkstra G, Kuiper D, de Jong P, Franssen C, Gansevoort R, Izaks G, Jager K & Reijneveld S (2009) Accepting or declining dialysis: considerations taken into account by elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Journal of Nephrology 22, 794-799.
70. Woods J, Port F, Stannard D, Blagg C & Held P (1996) Comparisons of mortality with home hemodialysis and center hemodialysis: a national study. Kidney International 49, 1464-1470.
71. Wuerth D, Finkelstein S, Schwetz O, Carey H, Kliger A & Finkelstein F (2002) Patients' description of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 22, 184-190.
72. Zhang A, Bargman J, Lok C, Porter E, Mendez M, Oreopoulos D & Chan C (2010) Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies. International Urology and Nephrology 42, 759-764.