Peritoneal dialysis: An underutilized modality

Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 573-577

  Jiwakanon, Sirin ^a,b   Chiu, Yi Wen ^b,c   Kalantar Zadeh, Kamyar ^a,d   Mehrotra, Rajnish ^a,d  

^a LOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HATYAI HOSPITAL   (Thailand)

^c KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

end stage renal disease; hemodialysis; mortality; peritoneal dialysis; renal replacement therapy; utilization

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPED COUNTRY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT MONITORING; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL DIALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78049296914     PISSN: 10624821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32833d67a3     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2009 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 2009.
2. Blake PG, Finkelstein FO. Why is the proportion of patients doing peritoneal dialysis declining in North America? Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:107-114.
3. Mehrotra R, Kermah D, Fried L, et al. Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States: declining utilization despite improving outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18:2781-2788.
4. Mendelssohn DC, Mujais SK, Soroka SD, et al. A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24:555-561.
5. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, et al. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2005; 68:378-390.
6. Finkelstein FO, Story K, FiranekC, et al. Perceived knowledge among patients cared for by nephrologists about chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease therapies. Kidney Int 2008; 74:1178-1184.
7. Blake PG. Free modality choice: aspiration or illusion? Introduction. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29:133-134.
8. Khawar O, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lo WK, et al. Is the declining use of long-term peritoneal dialysis justified by outcome data? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2:1317-1328.
9. Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:2851-2860.
10. Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC, et al. Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:174-183.
11. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Vonesh E. The outcomes of con-tinuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009; 76:97-107.
12. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in United States. Arch Intern Med (in press).
13. Weinhandl ED, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, et al. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21:499-506.
14. McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:155-163
15. Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MG, et al. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands. Kidney Int 2007; 71:153-158.
16. Huang CC, Cheng KF, Wu HD. Survival analysis: comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Taiwan. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28 (Suppl 3):S15-S20.
17. Johnson DW, Dent H, Hawley CM, et al. Associations of dialysis modality and infectious mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53:290-297.
18. Johnson DW, Dent H, Hawley CM, et al. Association of dialysis modality and cardiovascular mortality in incident dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:1620-1628.
19. Fong E, Bargman JM, Chan CT. Cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and illness intrusiveness in patients who are treated with nocturnal home hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Int J NursStud 2007; 2:1195-1200.
20. Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP, et al. Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2007; 71:673-678.
21. Povlsen JV. Unplanned start on assisted peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol 2009; 163:261-263.
22. Verger C, Duman M, Durand PY, et al. Influence of autonomy and type of home assistance on the prevention of peritonitis in assisted automated peritoneal dialysis patients. An analysis of data from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:1218-1223.
23. Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG, et al. Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
24. Just PM, Riella MC, Tschosik EA, et al. Economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2008; 86:163-180.
25. Shih YC, Guo A, Just PM, Mujais S. Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 2005; 68:319-329.