|
Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 22-29
|
What do American nephrologists think about dialysis modality selection?
a,b,c a,b,c a,b,c a,b,c a,b,c |
Author keywords
Dialysis; Hemodialysis (HD); Modality selection; Peritoneal dialysis (PD); Survey
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
HEMODIALYSIS;
HUMAN;
KIDNEY FAILURE;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
NEPHROLOGY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REIMBURSEMENT;
SURVIVAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE;
CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HOME CARE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
STATISTICS;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HOME NURSING;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEPHROLOGY;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY;
POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RENAL DIALYSIS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 85047696576
PISSN: 02726386
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.20635 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (179)
|
References (27)
|