Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: Identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies

International Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 759-764

  Zhang, Ai Hua ^a,b   Bargman, Joanne M ^b   Lok, Charmaine E ^b   Porter, Eveline ^b   Mendez, Maria ^b   Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G ^b   Chan, Christopher T ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Dialysis modality selection; Home dialysis; Social support

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HOME CARE; HOME DIALYSIS; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

AGED; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HOME CARE SERVICES, HOSPITAL-BASED; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 78549286294     PISSN: 03011623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9793-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. HR Rubin NE Fink LC Plantinga, et al. 2004 Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis JAMA 291 697 703 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXht12ms7o%3D 10.1001/jama.291.6.697 14871912 (Pubitemid 38543789)
2. RN Foley AJ Collins 2007 End-stage renal disease in the United States: an update from the United States Renal Data System J Am Soc Nephrol 18 2644 2648 10.1681/ASN.2007020220 17656472 (Pubitemid 47531190)
3. PK Li SL Lui CB Leung, et al. 2007 Increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis to cope with mounting demand for renal replacement therapy-perspectives from Asian countries Perit Dial Int 27 Suppl 2 S59 S61 17556331
4. MS Mcgregor JW Agar CR Blagg 2006 Home hemodialysis international trends and variation Nephrol Dial Transplant 21 1934 1945 10.1093/ndt/gfl093 (Pubitemid 43985723)
5. DC Mendelssohn SK Mujais SD Soroka, et al. 2009 A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility Nephrol Dial Transplant 24 2 555 561 10.1093/ndt/gfn484 18755848
6. DC Mendelssohn A Pierratos 2002 Reformulating the integrated care concept for the new millennium Perit Dial Int 22 5 8 11929144
7. J Bernardini V Price A Figueiredo, et al. 2006 International survey of peritoneal dialysis training programs Perit Dial Int 26 658 663 17047232
8. A Levin M Lewis P Mortiboy, et al. 1997 Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings Am J Kidney Dis 29 533 540 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3lsVKgsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90334-6 9100041
9. BM Curtis BJ Barret K Jindal, et al. 2002 Canadian survey of clinical status at dialysis initiation 1998-1999: a multicenter prospective survey Clin Nephrol 58 282 288 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nktFGjtQ%3D%3D 12400843
10. JG Van Manen JC Korevaar FW Dekker, et al. 2003 NECOSAD-study group. Adjustment for comorbidity in studies on health status in ESRD patients: which comorbidity index to use? J Am Soc Nephrol 14 478 485 10.1097/01.ASN.0000043902. 30577.C9 12538750 (Pubitemid 36150873)
11. Oreopoulos DG, Thodis E, Passadakis P et al (2003) Home dialysis as a first option: a new paradigm. Int Urol Nephrol 41(3):595-605 [Epub 2009 May 9 Review]
12. V Liakopoulos I Stefanidis NV Dombros 2010 Peritoneal dialysis glossary 2009 Int Urol Nephrol 42 2 417 423 10.1007/s11255-009-9619-9 19760132
13. DC Mendelssohn SR Mullaney B Jung, et al. 2001 What do American nephologists think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 37 22 29 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ktVeiuw%3D%3D 11136163
14. B Jung PG Blake RL Mehta, et al. 1999 Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection Perit Dial Int 19 263 268 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzmtVGntA%3D%3D 10433164
15. DC Miskulin KB Meyer NV Athienites, et al. 2002 Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE Study. Choices for healthy outcomes in caring for end-stage renal disease Am J Kidney Dis 39 324 336 10.1053/ajkd.2002.30552 11840373
16. AG Stack 2002 Determinants of modality selection among incident US dialysis patients: results from a national study J Am Soc Nephrol 13 1279 1287 11961016
17. KJ Jager JC Korevaar FW Dekker, et al. 2004 Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group: the effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands Am J Kidney Dis 43 891 899 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12. 051 15112180 (Pubitemid 38529627)
18. WC Winkelmayer RJ Glynn R Levin, et al. 2001 Late referral and modality choice in end-stage renal disease Kidney Int 60 1547 1554 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3Mrkt12iuw%3D%3D 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00958.x 11576371 (Pubitemid 32960051)
19. E Fong JM Bargman CT Chan 2007 Cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and illness intrusiveness in patients who are treated with nocturnal home hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2 1195 1200 10.2215/CJN.02260507 17928469
20. MJ Oliver RR Quinn EP Richardson, et al. 2007 Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis Kidney Int 71 673 678 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7osVSjtA%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ki.5002107 17264874 (Pubitemid 46494561)
21. M Agraharkar C Barclay A Agraharkar 2002 Staff-assisted home hemodialysis in debilitated or terminally ill patients Int Urol Nephrol 33 139 144 10.1023/A:1014417002040 12090321
22. PM Just FT de Charro EA Tschosik, et al. 2008 Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world Nephrol Dial Transplant 23 2365 2373 10.1093/ndt/gfm939 18234844 (Pubitemid 351957587)