A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 149-158

  Murray, Mary Ann ^a   Brunier, Gillian ^b   Chung, Jenny Oey ^c   Craig, Lee Ann ^d   Mills, Cynthia ^e   Thomas, Alison ^f   Stacey, Dawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario   (Canada)

^d LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^e Hotel Dieu Grace Hospital Windsor   (Canada)

^f ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Decision support; End stage renal disease; Patient decision aids; Shared decision making; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WELLBEING; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 67650596633     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010     Document Type: Short Survey

References (60)

1. Levey A., Atkins R., Coresh J., Cohen E., Collins A.J., Eckardt K., Nahas M.E., Jaber B.L., Jadoul M., Levin A., Powe N.R., Rossert J., Wheeler D.C., Lameire N., and Eknoyan G. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives-a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int 72 (2007) 247-259
2. O'Connor A.M., Drake E.R., Wells G.A., Tugwell P., Laupacis A., and Elmslie T. A survey of the decision making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expect 6 (2003) 109
3. Coulter A. What do patients and the public want form primary care?. Brit Med J 331 (2005) 1199-1201
4. Chamot E., Charvet A., and Perneger T. Women's preferences for doctors involvement in decisions about mammography screening. Med Decision Making 24 (2004) 379-385
5. Martin S. Shared responsibility becoming the new medical buzzword. Can Med Assoc J 167 (2002)
6. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decision Making 15 (1995) 25-30
7. North American Nursing Diagnosis (NANDA). Definitions & classifications 2005 Philadelphia, PA: North American Nursing Diagnosis Associate International (NANDA); 2005.
8. Gattelari M., and Ward J.E. Men's reactions to disclosed and undisclosed opportunistic PSA screening for prostate cancer. Med J Aust 182 (2005) 386-389
9. Sun Q. Predicting downstream effects of high decisional conflict: meta-analysis of the Decisional Conflict Scale (2004), University of Ottawa
10. Coulter A., and Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating and involving patients. Brit Med J 335 (2007) 24-27
11. O'Connor A.M., Bennett C., Stacey D., Barry M., Nananda F., Eden K., Entwistle V., Fiset V., Holmes-Rovner M., Khangura S., Llewellyn-Thomas H., and Rovner D.R. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decision Making 27 (2007) 554-574
12. Gravel K., Legare F., and Graham I.D. Barriers and Facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals. Implementation Sci 1 (2006) 1-12
13. Gordon E.J. Patients' decisions for treatment of end-stage renal disease and their implications for access to transplantation. Soc Sci Med 53 (2001) 971-987
14. Davison S. Facilitating advance care planning for patients with end stage renal disease: the patients perspective. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1 (2006) 1023-1028
15. Orsino A., Cameron J., Seidl M., Mendelssohn D., and Stewart D. Medical decision making needs and information needs in en-stage renal disease patents. Gen Hosp Psychiatr 23 (2003) 324-331
16. Tweed A.E., and Ceaser K. Renal replacement therapy choices for pre-dialysis renal patients. Brit J Nurs 14 (2005) 659-664
17. Public Health Resource Unit. Critical appraisal of qualitative studies. Public Health Resource Unit, Oxford, UK 2006 [cited 2007 January 11].
18. City of Hamilton. Effective public health practice project assessment tool for quantitative studies (2003), Public Health Department, City of Hamilton, Ontario [cited 2007 January 11]
19. Shea B.J., Grimshaw J.M., Wells G.A., Boers M., Andersson N., Hamel C., Porter A.C., Tugwell P., Moher D., and Bouter L.M. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7 (2007) 10
20. Legare F, Ratte S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Turcot I, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision-making by healthcare professionals (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007.
21. Agraharkar M., Patlovany M., Henry S., and Bonds B. Promoting use of home dialysis. Adv Periton Dialysis 19 (2003) 163-167
22. Anderson J.E., Sikorski I., and Finucane T.E. Advance care planning by or on behalf of peritoneal dialysis patients in long-term care. Am J Kidney Dis 48 (2006) 122-127
23. Bass E.B., Wills S., Fink N.E., Jenckes M.W., Sadler J.H., Levey A.S., et al. How strong are patients' preferences in choices between dialysis modalities and doses?. Am J Kidney Dis 44 (2004) 695-705
24. Halpern S.D., Berns J.S., and Israni A.K. Willingness of patients to switch from conventional to daily hemodialysis: looking before we leap. Am J Med 116 (2004) 606-612
25. Coupe D. Making decisions about dialysis options: an audit of patients' views. Edtna-Erca J 24 (1998) 25-26
26. Hines S.C., Glover J.J., Babrow A.S., Holley J.L., Badzek L.A., and Moss A.H. Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences. J Palliative Med 4 (2001) 481-489
27. King K. Patients' perspectives of factors affecting modality selection: a national kidney foundation patient survey. Adv Renal Replacement Ther 7 (2000) 261-268
28. Moss A.H., Hozayen O., King K., Holley J.L., and Schmidt R.J. Attitudes of patients toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the dialysis unit. Am J Kidney Dis 38 (2001) 847-852
29. Orsino A., Cameron J.I., Seidl M., Mendelssohn D., and Stewart D.E. Medical decision-making and information needs in end-stage renal disease patients 28. Gen Hosp Psychiatr 25 (2003) 324-331
30. Wuerth D., Finkelstein S., Schwetz O., Carey H., Kilger A., and Finkelstein F. Patients' description of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Periton Dialysis Int 22 (2002) 184-190
31. Christensen d.-Montez.E.A., Cvengros Ja A.J., and Lawton W.J. The role of depression symptoms in dialysis withdrawal. Health Psychol 25 (2006) 198-204
32. Holley J.L., Hines S.C., Glover J.J., Babrow A.S., Badzek L.A., and Moss A.H. Failure of advance care planning to elicit patients' preferences for withdrawal from dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 33 (1999) 688-693
33. Miura Y., Asai A., Nagata S., Ohnishi M., Shimbo T., Hosoya T., et al. Dialysis patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and withdrawal of dialysis in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 37 (2001) 1216-1222
34. Swartz R., Perry E., and Daley J. The frequency of withdrawal from acute care is impacted by severe acute renal failure. J Palliative Med 7 (2004) 676-682
35. Wenger N.S., Lynn J., Oye R.K., Liu HTJm, Philips R.S., Desbiens N.A., Sehgal A., Kussin P., Taub H., Harrell F., and Knaus W. Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 48 (2000) 83
36. Ayanian J.Z., Cleary P.D., Weissman J.S., and Epstein A.M. The effect of patients' preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation. New Engl J Med 341 (1999) 1661-1669
37. Gordon E.J. "They don't have to suffer for me": why dialysis patients refuse offers of living donor kidneys. Med Anthropol Quart 15 (2001) 245-267
38. Sharkey C., and Gourishankar S. Transplant Friends: an interactive education program for patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 35 (2003) 2405-2406
39. Bay W.H., Van Cleef S., and Owens M. The hemodialysis access: preferences and concerns of patients, dialysis nurses and technicians, and physicians. Am J Nephrol 18 (1998) 379-383
40. Biliwise D.L., Kutner N.G., Zhang R., and Parker K.P. Survival by time of day of hemodialysis in an elderly cohort. J Am Med Assoc 286 (2001) 2690-2694
41. Gordon E.J., Lein J.B., and Sehgal A.R. Why are hemodialysis treatments shortened and skipped? Development of a taxonomy and relationship to patient subgroups. Nephrol Nurs J: J Am Nephrol Nurses' Assoc 30 (2003) 209-217
42. Firooz A., Min-Nejad R., Bouzari N., Nafar M., Firoozan A., and Mahdavi-Mazdeh M. Sun protection in Iranian kidney transplant recipients: knowledge, attitude and practice. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21 (2007) 754-757
43. King K. Educational factors affecting modality selection: a National Kidney Foundation study. Edtna-Erca J 1998; 24, 27-29:29.
44. Calvin A. Haemodialysis patients and end of life decisions: a theory of personal preservation. J Adv Nurs 46 (2004) 558-566
45. Ashby M., op't Hoog C., Kellehear A., Kerr P.G., Brooks D., Nicholls K., and Forrest M. Renal dialysis abatement: lessons for a social study. Palliative Med 19 (2005) 389-396
46. Lin C., Lee B., and Hicks F. The phenomenology of deciding about hemodialysis among Taiwanese. West J Nurs Res 27 (2005) 915-929
47. Polashek N. Haemodialysing at home: the client experience of self-treatment. Edtna-Erca J 31 (2005) 27-30
48. Manns B.J., Taub K., Vanderstraeten C., Jones H., Mills C., Visser M., et al. The impact of education on chronic kidney disease patients' plans to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 68 (2005) 1777-1783
49. Richard C.J. Self-care management in adults undergoing hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J 33 (2006) 387-396
50. Badzek L., Hines S., and Moss A. Inadequate self-care knowledge among elderly hemodialysis patients: assessing its prevalence and potential causes. ANNA J 293 (1998)
51. Lee S.H., and Molassiotis A. Dietary and fluid compliance in Chinese hemodialysis patients. Int J Nurs Stud 39 (2002) 695-704
52. Mahajan S., Tiwari S.C., Kalra V., Bhowmik D.M., and Agarwal S.K. Factors affecting the use of peritoneal dialysis among the ESRD population in India: A single-center study. Peritoneal Dialysis Int 24 (2004) 538-541
53. Andrew J. The pre-dialysis experience-are individual needs being met?. Edtna-Erca J 27 (2001) 72-74
54. Waterman A.D., Stanley S.L., Covelli T., Hazel E., Hong B.A., and Brennan D.C. Living donation decision making: recipients' concerns and educational needs. Prog Transplant 16 (2006) 17-23
55. Elwyn G., O'Connor A., Stacey D., Volk R., Edwards A., Coulter A., et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Brit Med J 333 (2006) 417
56. Gordon E. Patients' decisions for treatment of end stage renal disease and their implications for access to transplantation. Soc Sci Med 53 (2001) 971-987
57. Tweed A., and Ceasar K. Renal replacement therapy choices for pre-dialysis renal patients. Brit J Nurs 14 (2005) 659-664
58. Winterbottom A., Conner M., Mooney A., and Bekker H. Evaluation the quality of patient leaflets about renal replacement therapy across UK renal units. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 22 (2007) 2291-2296
59. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. Client Centered Care Best Practice Guideline: Supplement; 2006. Toronto, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. Ref Type: Report.
60. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academies Press, Washington, DC