Taking the interface between mind and environment seriously

Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-30

  Fiedler, Klaus ^a   Juslin, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926096732     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614576.001     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Adams, J. K., & Adams, P. A. (1961). Realism of confidence judgments. Psychological Review, 68, 33–45.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23–53.
4. Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 223–241.
5. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Chater, N. (1996). Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. Psychological Review, 103, 566–581.
7. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395–416.
9. Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519–527.
10. Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103, 193–214.
11. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.
12. Fiedler, K., & Armbruster, T. (1994). Two halfs may be more than one whole: Category-split effects on frequency illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 633–645.
13. Fiedler, K., Brinkmann, B., Betsch, T., & Wild, B. (2000). A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond baserate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 399–418.
14. Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2004). Pseudocontingencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 453–467.
15. Fiedler, K., Schmid, J. & Stahl, T. (2002). What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 331–324.
16. Fiedler, K., & Walther, E. (2004). Stereotyping as social hypothesis testing. New York: Psychology Press.
17. Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Plessner, H. (2002). Judgment biases in a simulated classroom – a cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 527–561.
18. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.
21. Gigerenzer, G., & Fiedler, F. (2005). Minds in environments: The potential of an ecological approach to cognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instructions: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.
23. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528.
24. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & the ABC Group (1999) (Eds.). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407.
26. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief- adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1–55.
27. Hubert, M. (1999). The misuse of past-performance data. In L. E. Likson & R. A. Geist (Eds.), The psychology of investing (pp. 147–157). New York: Wiley.
28. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24.
29. Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1988). Out-group-homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and the group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778–788.
30. Juslin, P. (1994). The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 226–246.
31. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (1997). Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory Discrimination. Psychological Review, 104, 344–366.
32. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2005). Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000). Psychological Review, 112, 256–276.
33. Juslin, P., Winman A., & Olssen H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384–396.
34. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
35. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kareev, Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review, 107, 397–402.
37. Kashima, Y., Woolcock, J., & Kashima, E. S. (2000). Group impressions as dynamic configurations: The tensor product model of goup impression formation and change. Psychological Review, 107, 914–942.
38. Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107, 852–884.
39. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.
40. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
41. Koriat, A., Fiedler, K., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). The inflation of conditional predictions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
42. Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151–160.
43. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
44. Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The calibration of probability judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 159–183.
45. Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Martin, L. L. (1992). Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), Construction of social judgment (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Musch, J., & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.) (2002). The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and evaluation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608–631.
50. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). Rationality in an uncertain world: Essays on the cognitive science of human reasoning. Hove, England: Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
51. Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261–265.
52. Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (1991). Validity of the control question polygraph test: The problem of sampling bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 76, 229–238.
53. Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29–46.
54. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multi-alternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370–392.
55. Rulon, P. J. (1941). Problems of regression. Harvard Educational Review, 11, 213–223.
56. Semin, G. R., Rubini, M., & Fiedler, K. (1995). The answer is in the question: The effect of verb causality on locus of explanation. Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 21, 834–841.
57. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
58. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.
59. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.
60. Snyder, M. (1984). When belief creates reality. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 247–305). New York: Academic Press.
61. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
62. Stelzl, I. (1982). Fehler und Fallen der Statistik [Errors and traps in statistics] Bern: Huber.
63. Swann, W. B., Giuliano, T., & Wegner, D. M. (1982). Where leading questions can lead: The power of conjecture in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1025–1035.
64. Swets, J., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, Whole No. 1.
65. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.
66. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
67. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207–232.
68. Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547–567.
69. Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1991). Context dependent preferences. Management Science, 39, 1179–1189.
70. van der Helm, P. A., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1996). Goodness of visual regularities: A nontransformational approach. Psychological Review, 103, 429–456.
71. Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Noelle-Neumann, E. (1995). Question wording in comparative judgments: Understanding and manipulating the dynamics of the direction of comparison. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 347–372.
72. Weber, E., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R. (2004). Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient or variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430–445.
73. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125.
74. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., Colella, M. J., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 301–311.