Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk women: A population-based study

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 252-257

  Regan, J ^a   Keup, C ^a   Wolfe, K ^a   Snyder, C ^a   Defranco, E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CAUCASIAN; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PARITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL ASPECT; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WEIGHT GAIN; ETHNOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OHIO; PREGNANCY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OHIO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 84925957507     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.196     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health and Consensus Development Statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34(5): 351-365
2. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(25): 2581-2589
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Practice bulletin no. 115. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(2 Pt 1): 450-463
4. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(5): 1656-1662
5. Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLos Med 2012; 9(3): e101184
6. Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, Tocce K, Stone JL. Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(4): 741-746
7. Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Carroll CS, Barrilleaux PS, Scardo JA, Martin JN Jr. Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(2): 349-354
8. Carroll CS Sr, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Morrison JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188(6): 1516-1520
9. Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY et al. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108(1): 125-133
10. Durnwald CP, Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM. The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success. Am J of Obstetrics Gynecol 2004; 191(3): 954-957
11. Landon M, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW et al. The MFM Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(3 Pt 2): 1016-1023
12. Shanks AL, Cahill AG. Delivery after prior cesarean: success rate and factors. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38(2): 233-245
13. Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, Peipert JF, Odibo AO, Macones GA et al. Safety and success of vaginal birth After cesarean delivery in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol 2006; 23(3): 145-152
14. Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HM, Michaelson J, Berry SM, Sorokin Y et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45(12): 987-990
15. Dharan VB, Sk Srinivas, Parry S, Ratcliffe SJ, Macones G. Pregestational diabetes: a risk factor for vaginal birth after cesarean section failure?. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27 (3): 265-270
16. Cormier DM, Landon MB, Lai Y, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ et al. Whites classification of maternal diabetes and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in women undergoing a trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115(1): 60-64
17. Durnwald C, Mercer B. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: predicting success, risk of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15(6): 388-393
18. Ehrenberg HM. Intrapartum considerations in prenatal care. Semin Perinatal 2011; 35(6): 324-329
19. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis for success. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(5 Pt 1): 865-869
20. Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M et al. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(3): 420-429
21. Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, Aggarwal R, Trivedi SS. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(3): 224-228
22. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009
23. Grimes DA. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5): 1018-1019
24. Ananth CV. Perinatal epidemiologic research with vital statistics data: validity is the essential quality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(1): 5-6
25. Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soiche O. Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(1): 32 e1-32 e8
26. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Easterling TR, Gardella C et al. The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(1): 125-134
27. Bailit JL. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(3): 269e1-3
28. Reichman NE, Hade EM. Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program. Ann Epidemiol 2001; 11(3): 186-193
29. Emery ES, Eaton A, Grether JK, Nelson KB. Assessment of gestational age using birth certificate data compared with medical record data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997; 11(3): 313-321
30. Piper JM, Matchel EF Jr, Snowden M, Hall C, Adams M, Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137(7): 758-768
31. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Materal Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109(4): 806-812
32. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: e1-e6
33. Grobman WA. Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol. 2010; 34(4): 244-248
34. Grobman WA, Lai YL, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26(10): 693-701
35. Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD, Mateus J, Ghulmiyyah LM, Blackwell S et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(5): 1029-1033
36. Blackwell SC. Predicting VBAC success: from theory to clinical practice. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26(10): 691-692