Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 114, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1029-1033

  Costantine, Maged M ^a   Fox, Karin ^a   Byers, Benjamin D ^a   Mateus, Julio ^a   Ghulmiyyah, Labib M ^a   Blackwell, Sean ^a   Hankins, Gary D V ^a   Grobman, William A ^a   Saade, George ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TERM BIRTH; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; NOMOGRAMS; PREGNANCY; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 73549114669     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bb0dde     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57-07.pdf. Retrieved March 9, 2009.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:203-212
3. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-2589
4. 4. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1656-1662 (Pubitemid 41540462)
5. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:806-812
6. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (roc) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine [published erratum appears in Clin Chem 1993;39:1589]. Clin Chem 1993;39:561-577
7. HanleyJA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
8. 8. Lasko TA, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Ohno-Machado L. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 2005;38:404-415 (Pubitemid 41405811)
9. Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Statist Assoc 1967; 62:399-402.
10. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:224-231
11. Troyer LR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1099-1104
12. 12. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:907-910 (Pubitemid 27510127)
13. 13. Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, Ohel G. Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score. Am J Perinatol 2004;21:447-453 (Pubitemid 39586781)
14. Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med 2005;2:e252.
15. HashimaJN, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:e22-3.