Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the uk: A national case-control study

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E ^a   Kurinczuk, Jennifer J ^a   Alfirevic, Zarko ^b   Spark, Patsy ^a   Brocklehurst, Peter ^a   Knight, Marian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DISEASE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN DEATH; PERINATAL DEATH; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; RISK FACTOR; STILLBIRTH; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DELIVERY; MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; RISK; STATISTICS;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84858974165     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, lmezoglu AM, (2005) WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG 112: 1221-1228.
2. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (2004) Caesarean Section London RCOG.
3. Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D, (2004) Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev pp. CD004224.
4. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit (2001) The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report London RCOG.
5. Guise J-M, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, et al. (2004) Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 329: 19-25.
6. Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman M, Marshall N, et al. (2010) Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. evidence report/technology assessment no. 191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003 Rockville (Maryland) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
7. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C, (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ 322: 1089-1093; discussion 1093-1084.
8. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P, (2005) The UK Obstetric Surveillance System for rare disorders of pregnancy. BJOG 112: 263-265.
9. Knight M, (2008) Antenatal pulmonary embolism: risk factors, management and outcomes. BJOG 115: 453-461.
10. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, (2008) Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 111: 97-105.
11. Office for National Statistics (2011) Birth summary tables, England and Wales 2010 Newport Office for National Statistics.
12. General Register Office for Scotland (2010) Vital Events Reference Tables 2009 Edinburgh General Register Office for Scotland.
13. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (2010) Registrar General Annual Report 2009 Belfast Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency.
14. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, (2008) Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 111: 97-105.
15. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (2010) Perinatal mortality 2008 London Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries.
16. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JIP, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. (2009) Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG 116: 1069-1078.
17. EURO-PERISTAT Project (2008) European PERINATAL HEALTH REPort. Accessed November 2011. Available: www.europeristat.com.
18. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW, (2007) Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132: 171-176.
19. Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S, (2002) Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102: 120-126.
20. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, Brassard N, Cormier B, et al. (2010) The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 116: 43-50.
21. Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, (2008) A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut 57: 951-956.
22. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, et al. (2007) Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 110: 801-807.
23. Miller DA, Goodwin TM, Gherman RB, Paul RH, (1997) Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 89: 671-673.
24. The NHS Information Centre (2007) NHS maternity statistics, England- 2005-06 Leeds The NHS Information Centre.
25. The NHS Information Centre (2010) NHS maternity statistics, England- 2009-10 Leeds The NHS Information Centre.
26. Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, et al. (2010) Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG 117: 1358-1365.
27. Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsén L, Vangen S, (2010) Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG 117: 809-820.
28. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparen P, Terry P, Cnattingius S, (2007) Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG 114: 1208-1214.
29. Porreco RP, Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA, (2009) The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol pp. 200-269 e261-264.
30. Tahseen S, Griffiths M, (2010) Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG 117: 5-19.
31. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ, (2010) Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol 115: 1003-1006.
32. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E, (2001) Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 97: 175-177.
33. Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Emmanuelle P, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, et al. (2007) Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 110: 1075-1082.
34. Esposito MA, Menihan CA, Malee MP, (2000) Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1180-1183.
35. Dicle O, Kucukler C, Pirnar T, Erata Y, Posaci C, (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections. Eur Radiol 7: 31-34.
36. Egarter CH, Husslein PW, Rayburn WF, (1990) Uterine hyperstimulation after low-dose prostaglandin E2 therapy: tocolytic treatment in 181 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 794-796.
37. Smith JG, Merrill DC, (2006) Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49: 594-608.
38. McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Guise JM, (2005) The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG 112: 1007-1015.