White's classification of maternal diabetes and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in women undergoing a trial of labor

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 60-64

  Cormier, Clint M ^a   Landon, Mark B ^a   Lai, Yinglei ^a   Spong, Catherine Y ^a   Rouse, Dwight J ^a   Leveno, Kenneth J ^a   Varner, Michael W ^a   Simhan, Hyagriv N ^a   Wapner, Ronald J ^a   Sorokin, Yoram ^a   Miodovnik, Menachem ^a   Carpenter, Marshall ^a   Peaceman, Alan M ^a   O'Sullivan, Mary J ^a   Sibai, Baha M ^a   Langer, Oded ^a   Thorp, John M ^a   Mercer, Brian M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL DIABETES MELLITUS; NEWBORN DISEASE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WHITE CLASSICATION; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 74049119489     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c534ca     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Martin JA, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: the final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;54: 1-116.
2. Durnwald C, Mercer B. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:388-393
3. ADA. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care 2002;26:917-932
4. Dabelea D, Snell-Bergeon JK, Hartsfield CL, Bischoff KJ, Hamman RF, McDuffie RS. Increasing prevalence of gesta-tional diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM screening program. Diabetes Care 2005;28:579-584
5. Getahun D, Nath C, Ananth CV, Chavez MR, Smulian JC. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal trends 1989 through 2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:e1-5.
6. Laolia A, Dalfra MG, Fedele D. Pregnancy complicated by type 2 diabetes: An emerging problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008;80:2-7.
7. Cousins L. Pregnancy complications among diabetic women: Review 1965-1985. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1987;42:140-149
8. Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, Tocce K, Stone JL. Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:741-746
9. Landon M, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al for The NICHD/MFMU Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-2589
10. Coleman TL, Randall H, Graves W, Lindsay M. Vaginal birth after cesarean among women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;45:987-990
11. Grinstead J, Grobman WA. Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: Predictors of vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:534-538
12. Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HW, Michaelson J, Berry SM, Sorokin Y. Why are cesarean delivery rates so high in diabetic pregnancies? J Perinat Med 2000;28: 316-320
13. Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HW, Michaelson J, Berry SM, Sorokin Y. Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida. J Repro Med 2000;45:987-990
14. White P. Classification of obstetric diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;130:228-230
15. Mehta CR, Patel NR, Senchaudhuri P. Exact power and sample-size computations for the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Biometrics 1998;54:1615-1621
16. Clopper CJ, Pearson E. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404-413
17. Becker T, Vermuelen MJ, Wyatt PR, Meier C, Ray JG. Prepregnancy diabetes and risk of placental vascular disease. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2496-2498
18. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952;47:583-621.