Estimating liver perfusion from free-breathing continuously acquired dynamic gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 88-94

  Chandarana, Hersh ^a   Block, Tobias Kai ^a   Ream, Justin ^a   Mikheev, Artem ^a   Sigal, Samuel H ^a   Otazo, Ricardo ^a   Rusinek, Henry ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compressed sensing reconstruction; Free breathing liver MRI; Gd EOB DTPA enhanced MRI; GRASP; Liver perfusion MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOXETIC ACID; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSED SENSING RECONSTRUCTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; LIVER PERFUSION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PLASMA CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVE; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; VERY ELDERLY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; LIVER; LIVER CIRCULATION; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIVER; LIVER CIRCULATION; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; LIVER FUNCTION TESTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84925953165     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000105     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Padhani AR. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:407-422.
2. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, et al. Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology. 2005;234:661-673.
3. Thng CH, Koh TS, Collins DJ, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1598-1609.
4. Materne R, Smith AM, Peeters F, et al. Assessment of hepatic perfusion parameters with dynamic MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:135-142.
5. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Bokacheva L, et al. Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F1548-F1559.
6. Zhang JL, Rusinek H, Bokacheva L, et al. Functional assessment of the kidney from magnetic resonance and computed tomography renography: impulse retention approach to a multicompartment model. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:278-288.
7. Hagiwara M, Rusinek H, Lee VS, et al. Advanced liver fibrosis: diagnosis with 3D whole-liver perfusion MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology. 2008;246:926-934.
8. Yang ZH, Ye XH, Tan Y, et al. Evaluation of cirrhotic liver with perfusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary experimental study in animal models with half-liver cirrhosis. Chin Med Sci J. 2006;21:252-257.
9. Annet L, Materne R, Danse E, et al. Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and Doppler US: correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiology. 2003;229:409-414.
10. Cao Y, Wang H, Johnson TD, et al. Prediction of liver function by using magnetic resonance-based portal venous perfusion imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:258-263.
11. Taouli B, Johnson RS, Hajdu CH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: perfusion quantification with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:795-800.
12. Wang J, Chen LT, Tsang YM, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI analysis of perfusion changes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with an antiangiogenic agent: a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:713-719.
13. Chen BB, Hsu CY, Yu CW, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis patients. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:171-180.
14. Nilsson H, Blomqvist L, Douglas L, et al. Dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for the assessment of total and segmental liver function and volume in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:879-886.
15. Nilsson H, Blomqvist L, Douglas L, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the assessment of liver function and volume in liver cirrhosis. Br J Radiol. 2013;86:20120653.
16. Nilsson H, Nordell A, Vargas R, et al. Assessment of hepatic extraction fraction and input relative blood flow using dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrastenhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:1323-1331.
17. Haimerl M, Verloh N, Zeman F, et al. Assessment of clinical signs of liver cirrhosis using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3 T MRI. PLoS One. 2013;8:e85658.
18. Ryeom HK, Kim SH, Kim JY, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI Using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5:231-239.
19. Kang SK, Huang WC, Wong S, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurement of renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:687-692.
20. Davenport MS, Caoili EM, Kaza RK, et al. Matched within-patient cohort study of transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR Imaging of the liver: gadoxetate disodium versus gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2014;272:123-131.
21. Davenport MS, Viglianti BL, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality. Radiology. 2013;266:452-461.
22. Chandarana H, Feng L, Block TK, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:10-16.
23. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT, et al. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:707-717.
24. Mikheev A, Lee VS, Rusinek H. Targeted coregistration of abdominal DCE MRI. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Montreal, Canada: ISMRM conference; 2011.
25. Sourbron S, Sommer WH, Reiser MF, et al. Combined quantification of liver perfusion and function with dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;263:874-883.
26. Donoho D. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 2006;52:1289-1306.
27. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1182-1195.
28. Block KT, Uecker M, Frahm J. Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:1086-1098.
29. Otazo R, Kim D, Axel L, et al. Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:767-776.
30. Agrawal MD, Spincemaille P, Mennitt KW, et al. Improved hepatic arterial phase MRI with 3-second temporal resolution. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1129-1136.
31. Brodsky EK, Bultman EM, Johnson KM, et al. High-spatial and high-temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging of the liver with timeresolved three-dimensional radial MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].
32. Xu B, Spincemaille P, Chen G, et al. Fast 3D contrast enhanced MRI of the liver using temporal resolution acceleration with constrained evolution reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:370-381.
33. Zhang T, Chowdhury S, Lustig M, et al. Clinical performance of contrast enhanced abdominal pediatric MRI with fast combined parallel imaging compressed sensing reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:13-25.
34. Chandarana H, Abiri B, Gaing B, et al. Flexible Temporal Reconstruction of Continuously Acquired Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Acquisition for Simultaneous Perfusion and Morphologic Imaging of the Abdomen. In Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), Milan, Italy, 2014.
35. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Smith AM, et al. Non-invasive quantification of liver perfusion with dynamic computed tomography and a dual-input onecompartmental model. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000;99:517-525.
36. Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology. 1993;188:405-411.
37. Van Beers BE, Leconte I, Materne R, et al. Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:667-673.
38. Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195:785-792.
39. van Montfoort JE, Stieger B, Meijer DK, et al. Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoxetate by the organic anion transporting polypeptide Oatp1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;290:153-157.
40. Akimoto S, Mori H, Fujii T, et al. Optimal scan timing for Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced liver dynamic MR imaging [in Japanese]. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;65:626-630.
41. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1042-1046.
42. Tamada T, Ito K, Sone T, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:636-640.
43. Benness G, Khangure M, Morris I, et al. Hepatic kinetics and magnetic resonance imaging of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA in dogs. Invest Radiol. 1996;31:211-217.
44. Gill AB, Black RT, Bowden DJ, et al. An investigation into the effects of temporal resolution on hepatic dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in volunteers and in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:3187-3200.