Comparison of planned and achieved implant position in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific positioning guides

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 201-207

  Van Leeuwen, Justin A M J ^a   Grøgaard, Bjarne ^b   Nordsletten, Lars ^b   Röhrl, Stephan M ^b  

^a Betanien Hospital   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ANIMAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84925947299     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.985154     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (5): 682-7.
2. Berger R A, Crossett L S, Jacobs J J, Rubash H E. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356): 144-53.
3. Boonen B, Schotanus M G, Kort N P. Preliminary experience with the patientspecific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (4): 387- 93.
4. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (3): 354-9.
5. Chauhan S K, Clark G W, Lloyd S, Scott R G, Breidahl W, Sikorski J M. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (6): 818-23.
6. Chotanaphuti T, Wangwittayakul V, Khuangsirikul S, Foojareonyos T. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial. Knee 2014; 21 (1): 185-8.
7. Daniilidis K, Tibesku C O. A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (3): 503-8.
8. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 457: 156-62.
9. Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O. Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005- 2008. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (3): 293-300.
10. Kim Y H, Kim J S, Yoon S H. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (4): 471-6.
11. Macdessi S J, Jang B, Harris I A, Wheatley E, Bryant C, Chen D B. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014; 21 (2): 406-9.
12. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 2001; 14 (3): 152-6.
13. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (2): 236-43.
14. Nam D, Maher P A, Rebolledo B J, Nawabi D H, McLawhorn A S, Pearle A D. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2013; 20(4): 263-7.
15. Ng V Y, DeClaire J H, Berend K R, Gulick B C, Lombardi A V, Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1): 99-107.
16. Nunley R M, Ellison B S, Zhu J, Ruh E L, Howell S M, Barrack R L. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (3): 895-902.
17. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (4): 464-70.
18. Ritter M A, Faris P M, Keating E M, Meding J B. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299): 153-6.
19. Rosenberger R E, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (3): 249-57.
20. Siston R A, Patel J J, Goodman S B, Delp S L, Giori N J. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (10): 2276-80.
21. Stronach B M, Pelt C E, Erickson J, Peters C L. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(1): 169-74.
22. Tingart M, Luring C, Bathis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L. Computerassisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (1): 44-50.
23. Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel P M, Bellemans J. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee 2009; 16 (5): 358-65.
24. Woolson S T, Harris A H, Wagner D W, Giori N J. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (5): 366-72.
25. Yau W P, Chiu K Y, Zuo J L, Tang W M, Ng T P. Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (4): 935-45.