Comprehension skill, inference making, and the role of knowledge

Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: Inference and Comprehension Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 233-254

  McNamara, Danielle S ^a   Oreilly, Tenaha ^a   De Vega, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925790809     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936443     Document Type: Chapter

References (99)

1. Baker, L. (1982). An evaluation of the role of metacognitive deficits in learning dis-abilities. Topic in Leaning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 27-35.
2. Baker, L. (1994). Fostering metacognitive development. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 201-239). San Diego: Academic Press.
3. Bartholow, B. D., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2001). A psychophys-iological examination of cognitive processing of affective responses to social expectancy violations. Psychological Sciences, 12,197-204.
4. Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2,131-156.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
6. Cain, K. (1996). Story knowledge and comprehension skill. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 167-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cantor, J., & Engle, R. (1993). Working memory capacity as long term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 19,1101-1114.
8. Case, R., Kurland, D., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33,384-404.
9. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18,439-477.
10. Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related infor-mation in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,257-273.
11. Conway A., & Engle, R. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123,354-373.
12. Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. (1996). In C. Cornoldi and J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading compre-hension difficulties. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74.
14. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information system. Psychological Bul-letin, 104,163-191.
15. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, R (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19,450-466.
16. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9,561-584.
17. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic-Bulletin-and-Review, 3,422-433.
18. Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined.
19. M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading. (pp. 491-508). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Dewitz, P, Carr, E., & Patberg, J. (1987). Effects of interference training on compre-hension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22,99-121.
21. Diaz, J. M., Leon, I., & de Vega, M. (2003). Brain potentials during the reading of emotionally incongruent texts. Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, June, Madrid.
22. Dixon, E, LeFevre, J. A., & Twilley, L. C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,465-472.
23. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D., & Cote, N. C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29,566-581.
24. Engle, R. (1996). Working memory and retrieval: An inhibition-resource approach. In Working memory and human cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Engle, R., & Marshall, K. (1983). Do developmental changes in digit span result from acquisition strategies? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36,429-436.
26. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102,211-245.
27. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84.
28. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29-46.
30. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
32. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16,430-445.
33. Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. (1994). Processing components of college-level reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 83-104.
34. Hansen, J., & Pearson, P (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821-829.
35. Hoover, W., & Gough, P (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160.
36. Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (1992). Phonological deficits in dyslexia: A “sound” rep-praisal of the verbal deficit hypothesis. In N. Singh & I. Beale (Eds.), Current per-spectives in learning disabilities (pp. 270-301). New York: Springer.
37. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99,122-149.
38. Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-in-tegration model. Psychological Review, 95,163-182.
39. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67,271-299.
41. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inap-propriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11,99-116.
42. Kutas, M., & King, J. W (1996). The potentials for basic sentence processing: Differentiating integrative processes. In I. Ikeda & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and Performance (Vol. 16, pp. 501-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83-143). San Diego: Academic Press.
44. Long, D., & Golding, J. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 55-74.
45. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20,1456-1470.
46. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psycho-logical Review, 109, 35-54.
47. Magliano, J. P, & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud pro-cedure. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 251-283.
48. Magliano, J. P, Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K. K., Munoz, B. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34,181-188.
49. Marines, S., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4,91-115.
50. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645-656.
51. McDaniel, M. A., Finstad, K. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2003). The suppression effect: Effects of word-level elaboration. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
52. McDaniel, M. A., Schmalhofer, F., & Keefe, D. (2001). What is minimal about predictive inferences? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8,840-846.
53. McNamara, D. S. (1997). Comprehension skill: A Knowledge-based account. In Pro-ceedings of Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 508-513). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62.
55. McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38,1-30.
56. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
57. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14,1-43.
58. McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30,465-482.
59. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387-392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29,10-17.
61. Mueller, H. M., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1997). Event-related potentials to relative clause processing in spoken sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 5,193-203.
62. Miinte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 71-73.
63. Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73,13-20.
64. Oakhill, J. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35,441-450.
65. Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children&s comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31-39.
66. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less skilled compre-henders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and speech, 29,25-37.
67. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornaldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading compre-hension difficulties: Processes and Intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Donaldson, M. (1990). Understanding of causal expressions in skilled and less skilled text comprehenders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8,401-410.
69. Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Parkin, A. (1988). Memory and inference in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory 2 (pp. 315-320). Chichester: Wiley.
70. Obrien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1985). When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11,12-21.
71. O&Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the Reverse Cohesion Effect: Good Texts Can be Better for Strategic, High-Knowledge Readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121-152.
72. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2,117-175.
73. Paris, S., Cross, D., & Lipson, M. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children&s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educa-tional Psychology, 76,1239-1252.
74. Paris, S., & Jacobs, J. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children&s read-ing awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
75. Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Perfetti, C. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 307-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In David Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of con-structively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79. Rauenbusch, F., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Making reading more difficult: A degraded text microworld for teaching reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 8,181-206.
80. Rosen, V., & Engle, R. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126,211-227.
81. Rosen, V., & Engle, R. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418-436.
82. Schmalhofer, F. (1998). Constructive knowledge acquisition: A computational model and experimental evaluation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M. A., & Keefe, D. (2002). A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 33,105-132.
84. Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Katz, L., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J., Brady, S., et al., (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69-94.
85. Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84,127-190.
86. Singer, M., Andrusiak, P, Reisdorf, P, & Black, N. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20, 539-548.
87. Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743.
88. Snow, C. E., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washigton, DC: National Academy Press.
89. St. George, M., Marines, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1997). Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 776-787.
90. Stanovich, K., West, R., Cunningham, A., Cipielewski, J., & Siddequi, S. (1996). In C. C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and inter-vention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
91. Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1996). A comparison of reading comprehension and decoding difficulties in children. In C. Cornoldi and J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading com-prehension difficulties (pp. 93-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Turner, M., & Engle, R. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28,127-154.
93. Van Petten, C., Weckerly, J., Mclsaac, H. K., & Kutas, M. (1997). Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 8, 238-242.
94. Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 16,111-122.
95. Whitney, P, Ritchie, B., & Clark, M. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14,133-145.
96. Wong, B. (1985). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In D. Forrest-Pressley, G. MacKinnon, & T. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 137-180). New York: Academic Press.
97. Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79,173-186.
98. Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children&s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge monographs and texts in applied psycholinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Yuill, N., Oakhill, J., & Parkin, A. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80,351-361.