Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: Inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype × environment interactions and conserve genetic variance

Genetica

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-36

  Danielson François, Anne M ^a,b   Zhou, Yihong ^a   Greenfield, Michael D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Courtship song; Mate choice; Sexual selection; Signal evolution

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOTH; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MOTHS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ACHROIA GRISELLA;

EID: 63949087163     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9297-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BH Bleakley DJ Parker EC Brodie III 2007 Nonadditive effects of group membership can lead to additive group phenotypes for anti-predator behaviour of guppies, Poecilia reticulata J Evol Biol 20 1375 1384 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007. 01342.x
2. Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19-80
3. LSE Brandt MD Greenfield 2004 Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song J Evol Biol 17 821 828 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00716.x
4. R Brooks 2000 Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival Nature 406 67 70 10.1038/35017552
5. P Casares MC Carracedo E San Miguel R Pineiro L Garcia-Florez 1993 Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype Behav Genet 23 349 358 10.1007/BF01067436
6. RD Collins Y Jang K Reinhold MD Greenfield 1999 Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signalling in the lesser waxmoth, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Heredity 83 644 651 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885540
7. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York
8. JW Curtsinger PM Service T Prout 1994 Antagonistic pleiotropy, reversal of dominance, and genetic polymorphism Am Nat 144 210 228 10.1086/285671
9. A Danielson-François JK Kelly MD Greenfield 2006 Genotype × environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization J Evol Biol 19 532 542 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005. 01006.x
10. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
11. J Felsenstein 1976 The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration Annu Rev Genet 10 253 280 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176. 001345
12. MJ Fitzpatrick E Feder L Rowe MB Sokolowski 2007 Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene Nature 447 210 212 10.1038/nature05764
13. JH Gillespie M Turelli 1989 Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation Genetics 121 129 138
14. MD Greenfield JA Coffelt 1983 Reproductive behaviour of the lesser waxmoth, Achroia grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae): signalling, pair formation, male interactions, and mate guarding Behaviour 84 287 315 10.1163/ 156853983X00534
15. Harris WE, McKane AJ, Wolf JB (2008) The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 62(2):337-347
16. AL Hughes 1989 Interaction between strains in the social relations of inbred mice Behav Genet 19 685 700 10.1007/BF01066031
17. Y Jang MD Greenfield 1996 Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in waxmoths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals Anim Behav 51 1095 1106 10.1006/anbe.1996.0111
18. Y Jang MD Greenfield 1998 Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Evolution Int J Org Evol 52 1383 1393 10.2307/2411308
19. Y Jang RD Collins MD Greenfield 1997 Variation and repeatability of ultrasonic sexual advertisement signals in Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) J Insect Behav 10 87 98 10.1007/BF02765476
20. MD Jennions AP Møller M Petrie 2001 Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis Q Rev Biol 76 3 36 10.1086/393743
21. FY Jia MD Greenfield RD Collins 2000 Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype × environment interaction Evolution Int J Org Evol 54 953 967
22. M Kirkpatrick MJ Ryan 1991 The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek Nature 350 33 38 10.1038/350033a0
23. G Künike 1930 Zur biologie der kleinen wachsmotte, Achroia grisella Fabr Z Angew Entomol 16 304 356
24. AM Leroi AK Chippendale MR Rose 1994 Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life history tradeoff in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-by- environment interaction Evolution Int J Org Evol 48 1244 1257 10.2307/2410382
25. AM Leroi WR Chen MR Rose 1994 Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life history tradeoff in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Stability of genetic correlations Evolution Int J Org Evol 48 1258 1268 10.2307/2410383
26. Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia Univ Press, New York
27. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland
28. LM Meffert 1995 Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire Genetics 139 365 374
29. CW Miller AJ Moore 2007 A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274 1279 1286 10.1098/rspb.2006.0413
30. SC Mills RV Alatalo E Koskela J Mappes T Mappes TA Oksanen 2007 Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation Evolution Int J Org Evol 61 1748 1757 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00145.x
31. AJ Moore ED Brodie III JB Wolf 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions Evolution Int J Org Evol 51 1352 1362 10.2307/2411187
32. D Petfield SF Chenoweth HD Rundle MW Blows 2005 Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male display tactics Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 6045 6050 10.1073/pnas.0409378102
33. D Queller 1994 Genetic relatedness in viscous populations Evol Ecol 8 70 73 10.1007/BF01237667
34. A Qvarnström 1999 Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) Evolution Int J Org Evol 53 1564 1572 10.2307/2640901
35. K Reinhold MD Greenfield Y Jang A Broce 1998 Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in waxmoths Anim Behav 55 905 913 10.1006/anbe.1997.0594
36. WR Rice 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution Nature 381 232 234 10.1038/381232a0
37. Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York
38. MR Rose 1982 Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation Heredity 48 63 78 10.1038/hdy.1982.7
39. J Shiotsugu AM Leroi H Yashiro MR Rose LD Mueller 1997 The symmetry of correlated selection responses in adaptive evolution: an experimental study using Drosophila Evolution Int J Org Evol 51 163 172 10.2307/2410969
40. HG Spangler MD Greenfield A Takessian 1984 Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth Physiol Entomol 9 87 95 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00684.x
41. PD Taylor GC Williams 1982 The lek paradox is not resolved Theor Popul Biol 22 392 409 10.1016/0040-5809(82)90052-1
42. JL Tomkins J Radwan J Kotiaho T Tregenza 2004 Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox Trends Ecol Evol 19 323 328 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.029
43. P Vos R Hogers M Bleeker M Reijans T Van de Lee M Hornes 1995 AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting Nucleic Acids Res 23 4407 4414 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
44. AM Welch 2003 Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent Evolution Int J Org Evol 57 883 893
45. SA West I Pen AS Griffin 2002 Conflict and cooperation: cooperation and competition between relatives Science 296 72 75 10.1126/science.1065507
46. JB Wolf 2000 Gene interactions from maternal effects Evolution Int J Org Evol 54 1882 1898
47. JB Wolf 2003 Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 4655 4660 10.1073/pnas.0635741100
48. JB Wolf WE Harris NJ Royle 2008 The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition Genetica 10.1007/s10709-007-9214-x