The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: The role of maternal and paternal effects

American Naturalist

Volumn 150, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 639-649

  Wolf, Jason B ^a,c   Moore, Allen J ^b   Brodie III, Edmund D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDICATOR TRAIT; MATERNAL EFFECT; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; PATERNAL EFFECT;

EID: 0030850482     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286086     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816.
2. _. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1985. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Experientia (Basel) 41:1296-1310.
4. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Evolution by kin selection: a quantitative genetic model illustrated by maternal performance in mice. Evolution 38:766-777.
5. Cheverud, J. M., and A. J. Moore. 1994. Quantitative genetics and the role of the environment provided by relatives in the evolution of behavior. Pages 67-100 in C. R. B. Boake, ed. Quantitative genetic studies of behavioral evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
7. Falconer, D. S. 1965. Maternal effects and selection response. Pages 763-774 in S. J. Geerts, ed. Genetics today: Proceedings of the XI International Congress on Genetics. Vol. 3. Pergamon, Oxford.
8. Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review 7:184-192.
9. Grafen, A., and R. A. Johnstone. 1993. Why we need ESS signalling theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 340:245-250.
10. Gustafsson, L., A. Qvarnström, and B. C. Sheldon. 1995 Trade-offs between life-history traits and a secondary sexual character in male collared flycatchers. Nature (London) 375:311-313.
11. Heywood, J. S. 1989. Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43:1387-1397.
12. Hill, G. E. 1991. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature (London) 350:337-339.
13. Hoelzer, G. A. 1989. The good parent process of sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 38:1067-1078.
14. Horseman, N. D., and J. D. Buntin 1995. Regulation of pigeon cropmilk secretion and parental behaviors by prolactin. Annual Review of Nutrition 15:213-238.
15. Kirkpatrick, M. 1985. Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the sexy son. American Naturalist 125:788-810.
16. _. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:43-70.
17. Kirkpatrick, M., and R. Lande. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43:485-503.
18. Kodric-Brown, A., and J. H. Brown. 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. American Naturalist 124:309-323.
19. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
20. Lynch, M. 1987. Evolution of intrafamilial interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 84:8507-8511.
21. Markow, T. A. 1995. Evolutionary ecology and developmental instability. Annual Review of Entomology 40:105-120.
22. Michod, R. E., and O. Hasson. 1990. On the evolution of reliable indicators of fitness. American Naturalist 135:788-808.
23. Møller, A. P. 1992. Female swallow preferences for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature (London) 357:238-240.
24. Moore, A. J., E. D. Brodie III, and J. B. Wolf. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution (in press).
25. Moore, A. J., J. B. Wolf, and E. D. Brodie III. 1998. The influence of direct and indirect genetic effects on the evolution of behavior: sexual and social selection meet maternal effects. In T. A. Mousseau and C. Fox, eds. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).
26. Mousseau, T. A., and C. Fox, eds. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).
27. Price, T., D. Schluter, and N. E. Heckman 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48:187-211.
28. Swaddler, J. P., and M. S. Witter. 1994. Food, feathers and fluctuating asymmetries. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 255:147-152.
29. Thornhill, R., and J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
30. Thornhill, R., and P. Sauer. 1992. Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Animal Behaviour 43:255-264.
31. Trivers, R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136-179 m B. Campbell ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Heinemann, London.
32. Van Valen, L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16:125-142.
33. Wade, M. J. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In T. A. Mousseau and C. Fox, eds. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).