The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 323-335

  Ecker, Ullrich K H ^a   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a,b   Chang, Ee Pin ^a   Pillai, Rekha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Facial impressions; Inferential reasoning; Memory updating; News communication; Reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; PUBLICATION; READING; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

COMMUNICATION; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; NEWSPAPERS; READING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925667615     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000028     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Althaus, S. L., Edy, J. A., Entman, R. M., & Phalen, P. F. (1996). Revising the indexing hypothesis: Officials, media, and the Libya crisis. Political Communication, 13, 407-421. doi:10.1080/10584609.1996.9963128
2. Althaus, S. L., Edy, J. A., & Phalen, P. F. (2001). Using substitutes for full-text news stories in content analysis: Which text is best? American Journal of Political Science, 45, 707-723. doi:10.2307/2669247
3. Andrew, B. C. (2007). Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 24-43. doi:10.1177/1081180X07299795
4. Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine. (2012). GMO foods-Are they safe? Look at the evidence. Retrieved from http://arizonaadvancedmed icine.com/gmo-foods-are-they-safe-look-at-the-evidence/
5. Australian Centre for Independent Journalism. (2011). A sceptical climate. Media coverage of climate change in Australia 2011: Pt. 1-Climate change policy. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.acij.uts.edu.au/pdfs/sceptical-climate-part1.pdf
6. Baerns, B. (2003). Separating advertising from programme content: The principle and its relevance in communications practice. Journal of Communication Management, 8, 101-112. doi:10.1108/13632540410807583
7. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Continuing influences of to-beforgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 176-196. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0011
8. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
9. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
10. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
11. Clarke, C. (2008). A question of balance: The autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American elite press. Science Communication, 30, 77-107. doi:10.1177/1075547008320262
12. Clow, K. A., & Leach, A.-M. (in press). After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology.
13. Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Kassel, R., Thadhani, C., Gooding, H. C., Parrott, R.,.. Jones, C. (2001). An exploratory study of the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Science Communication, 22, 379-395. doi:10.1177/1075547001022004002
14. Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1, 462-466. doi:10.1038/nclimate1295
15. Dobbs, M. (2012). The rise of political fact-checking-How Reagan inspired a journalistic movement: A reporter's eye view. Retrieved from http://newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/The_Rise_of_Political_Fact-checking.pdf.pdf
16. Dooling, D. J., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 216-222. doi:10.1037/h0030904
17. Dor, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695-721. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
18. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Apai, J. (2011b). Terrorists brought down the plane! No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 283-310. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.497927
19. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2014). Do people keep believing because they want to? Pre-existing attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 292-304. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x
20. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. H. (2010b). The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 170-189. doi: 10.1037/a0017891
21. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011a). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 570-578. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
22. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010a). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087-1100. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
24. Garry, M., Strange, D., Bernstein, D. M., & Kinzett, T. (2007). Photographs can distort memory for the news. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 995-1004. doi:10.1002/acp.1362
25. Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167-187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225
26. Geer, J. G., & Kahn, K. F. (1993). Grabbing attention: An experimental investigation of headlines during campaigns. Political Communication, 10, 175-191. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962974
27. Graney, J. M. (1990). Determination of fact and opinion: A critical reading problem. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 147-166. doi: 10.1007/BF01077414
28. Gross, A. E., & Crofton, C. (1977). What is good is beautiful. Sociometry, 40, 85-90. doi:10.2307/3033549
29. Guillory, J. J., & Geraci, L. (2013). Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 201-209. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.10.001
30. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117-159. doi:10.2307/747886
31. Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837-852. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.837
32. Health Protection Agency. (2011, 21 October). Completed primary courses at two years of age: England and Wales, 1966-1977, England only after 1978 onwards. Retrieved from http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733819251
33. Henkel, L. A. (2012). Seeing photos makes us read between the lines: The influence of photos on memory for inferences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 773-795. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.628400
34. Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., Horton, W. S., Jenkins, R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: Plausibility effects on memory for misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 305-324.
35. Huang, G. B., Ramesh, M., Berg, T., & Learned-Miller, E. (2007). Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Tech. Rep. No. 07-49. Retrieved from http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/lfw/index.html
36. Ifantidou, E. (2009). Newspaper headlines and relevance: Ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 699-720. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.016
37. Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1420-1436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
38. Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 854-865. doi:10.1037/a0029468
39. Krug, D., George, B., Hannon, S. A., & Glover, J. A. (1989). The effect of outlines and headings on readers' recall of text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 111-123. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90029-5
40. León, J. A. (1997). The effects of headlines and summaries on news comprehension and recall. Reading and Writing, 9, 85-106. doi: 10.1023/A:1007928221187
41. Leventhal, G., & Gray, S. J. (1991). Can innuendos in headlines affect perceptions? Psychological Reports, 69, 801-802. doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.801
42. Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Popular consensus climate change is set to continue. Psychological Science, 22, 460-463. doi:10.1177/0956797611402515
43. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
44. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Freund, A. M., Oberauer, K., & Krueger, J. I. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: From Iraq and the "War on Terror" to future threats to peace. American Psychologist, 68, 487-501. doi:10.1037/a0034515
45. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science, 16, 190-195. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x
46. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2009). Misinformation and the "War on Terror": When memory turns fiction into fact. In W. G. K. Stritzke, S. Lewandowsky, D. Denemark, J. Clare, & F. Morgan (Eds.), Terrorism and torture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 179-203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581199.010
47. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003). Working the borders in racist discourse: The challenge of the "Children Overboard Affair" in news media texts. Social Semiotics, 13, 283-303. doi:10.1080/1035033032000167024
48. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.615
49. Marsh, E. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2006). Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1140-1149. doi:10.3758/BF03193260
50. McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
51. Miller, L. M. S., Cohen, J. A., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1355-1367. doi:10.3758/BF03193277
52. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
53. Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133, 835-842. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365
54. Oberauer, K., & Vockenberg, K. (2009). Updating of working memory: Lingering bindings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 967-987. doi:10.1080/17470210802372912
55. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 11087-11092. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
56. Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229-235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00034.x
57. Otieno, C., Spada, H., & Renkl, A. (2013). Effects of news frames on perceived risk, emotions, and learning. PLoS ONE, 8, e79696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079696
58. Paunonen, S. V. (2006). You are honest, therefore I like you and find you attractive. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.12.003
59. Pedersen, A., Clarke, S., Dudgeon, P., & Griffiths, B. (2005). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians and asylum seekers: The role of false beliefs and other social-psychological variables. Australian Psychologist, 40, 170-178. doi:10.1080/00050060500243483
60. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
61. Pfau, M. R. (1995). Covering urban unrest: The headline says it all. Journal of Urban Affairs, 17, 131-141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1995.tb00340.x
62. Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Kohlhepp, K., & Ryskin, R. A. (2014). Reducing reliance on inaccurate information. Memory & Cognition, 42, 11-26. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0339-0
63. Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2007). Revisiting what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2019-2032. doi:10.3758/BF03192934
64. Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Noticing and revising discrepancies as texts unfold. Discourse Processes, 46, 1-24. doi:10.1080/01638530802629141
65. Ratzan, S. C. (2010). Editorial: Setting the record straight: Vaccines, autism, and The Lancet. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 237-239. doi:10.1080/10810731003780714
66. Rawle, T. (2013, October 17). Air pollution now leading cause of lung cancer. Express. Retrieved from http://www.express.co.uk/news/health/437473/Air-pollution-now-leading-cause-of-lung-cancer
67. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2002). How does background information improve memory for text content? Memory & Cognition, 30, 768-778. doi:10.3758/BF03196432
68. Seifert, C. M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 265-292. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3
69. Smith, A., Yarwood, J., & Salisbury, D. M. (2007). Tracking mothers' attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996-2006. Vaccine, 25, 3996-4002. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.071
70. Strange, D., Garry, M., Bernstein, D. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (2011). Photographs cause false memories for the news. Acta Psychologica, 136, 90-94. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.006
71. Surber, J. R., & Schroeder, M. (2007). Effect of prior domain knowledge and headings on processing of informative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 485-498. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.08.002
72. Tannenbaum, P. H. (1953). The effect of headlines on the interpretation of news stories. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 189-197.
73. Todorov, A., Said, C. C., & Verosky, S. C. (2011). Personality impressions from facial appearance. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 631-651). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351. doi:10.1002/acp.1418
75. van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Wegner, D. M., Wenzlaff, R., Kerker, R. M., & Beattie, A. E. (1981). Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 822-832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.822
76. Wemple, E. (2013, November 4). New York Post: "Bag Men" headline was an "attention-getter". The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/11/04/newyork-post-bag-men-headline-was-an-attention-getter/
77. Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1011-1021. doi:10.3758/BF03209349
78. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117