Grain size of recall practice for lengthy text material: Fragile and mysterious effects on memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 439-455

  Wissman, Kathryn T ^a   Rawson, Katherine A ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grain size effect; Recall practice; Text memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84925633751     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000047     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A meta-cognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 566-577. doi:10.1016/j .jml.2005.01.012
2. Baker, J. M. C., & Dunlosky, J. (2006). Does momentary accessibility influence metacomprehension judgments? The influence of studyjudgment lags on accessibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 60-65. doi:10.3758/BF03193813
3. Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Marsh, E. J. (2008). Fact learning: How information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Memory, 16, 934-946. doi:10.1080/09658 210802360603
4. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118-1133. doi:10.1037/a0019902
5. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 273-281. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
6. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514-527. doi:10.1080/09541440701326097
7. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604-616. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.604
8. Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect:The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experiment Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569. doi:10.1037/a0017021
9. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619-636. doi:10.1002/acp.1101
10. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268-276. doi:10.3758/BF03193405
11. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642. doi:10.3758/BF03202713
12. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095-1102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x
13. Chan, J. C. K. (2010). Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials. Memory, 18, 49-57. doi:10.1080/0965821 0903405737
14. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques:Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
15. Garner, R., Alexander, P. A., Gillingham, M. G., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 643-659. doi:10.3102/00028312028003643
16. Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocesing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2
17. Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392
18. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students:Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126-134. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
19. Jang, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 112-127. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.112
20. Kang, S. H., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620
21. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471-479. doi:10.1080/0965 8210802647009
22. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4
24. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133-159. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90069-C
25. Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85-97. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002
26. Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569-587. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002
27. Mayer, R. E., & Jackson, J. (2005). The case for coherence in scientific explanations: Quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 13-18. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.1.13
28. Miller, A. C., & Keenan, J. M. (2009). How word reading skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 99-113. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0025-x
29. Miller, A. C., & Keenan, J. M. (2011). Understanding the centrality deficit:Insight from foreign language learners. Memory & Cognition, 39, 873-883. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0062-z
30. Morris, C. C. (1990). Retrieval processes underlying confidence in comprehension judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 223-232. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.223
31. Nunes, L. D., & Weinstein, Y. (2012). Testing improves true recall and protects against the build-up of proactive interference without increasing false recall. Memory, 20, 138-154. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.648198
32. Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 287-297. doi:10.1037/a0021801
33. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis:Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437-444.
34. Rawson, K. A. (2012). Why do rereading lag effects depend on test delay? Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 870-884. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012 .03.004
35. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. D. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 283-302. doi:10.1037/a0023956
36. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2002). How does background information improve memory for text content? Memory & Cognition, 30, 768-778. doi:10.3758/BF03196432
37. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2004). Exploring encoding and retrieval effects of background information on text memory. Discourse Processes, 38, 323-344. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3803_3
38. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70-80.
39. Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for the main points of a text. Memory & Cognition, 10, 97-102. doi:10.3758/BF03209210
40. Roediger, H. L., III., & Butler, A. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27.
41. Roediger, H. L., III., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning:Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
42. Stine, E. A. L., & Wingfield, A. (1988). Memorability functions as an indicator of qualitative age differences in text recall. Psychology and Aging, 3, 179-183. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.3.2.179
43. Stine, E. A. L., & Wingfield, A. (1990). How much do working memory deficits contribute to age differences in discourse memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 289-304. doi:10.1080/09541 449008406209
44. Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 6313-6317. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221764110
45. Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1392-1399. doi:10.1037/a0013082
46. Verhaeghen, P., & Marcoen, A. (1993). More or less the same? A memorability analysis on episodic memory tasks in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 48, P172-P178. doi:10.1093/geronj/48.4.P172
47. Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Szpunar, K. K. (2011). Testing protects against proactive interference in face-name learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 518-523. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x
48. Whitten, W. B., II., & Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80040-6
49. Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2011). The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1140-1147. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7
50. Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568-579. doi:10.1080/09658211 .2012.687052
51. Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L., III (2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995-1008. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.995
52. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162