Text signals influence team artifacts

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 35-52

  Clariana, Roy B ^a   Rysavy, Monica D ^a   Taricani, Ellen ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative teams; Hyperlinks; Instructional design; Text signals; Text topic structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925506997     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9362-5     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bai, L. (2013). Parallel-pattern versus linear-pattern discussion online collaborations. In A master’s thesis in instructional systems. Pennsylvania State University. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/17658/.
2. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 717–726.
3. Cauchard, F., Eyrolle, H., Cellier, J.-M., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Vertical perceptual span and the processing of visual signals in reading. International Journal of Psychology,45, 40–47.
4. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences,14, 161–199.
5. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science,18, 439–477.
6. Chi, E. H., Gumbrecht, M., & Hong, L. (2007). Visual foraging of highlighted text: An eye-tracking study. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-computer interaction, Part III (pp. 589–598). Berlin: Springer.
7. Clariana, R. B. (2010). Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 117–130). New York, NY: Springer.
8. Clariana, R. B., Draper, D., & Land, S. M. (2011). An automated measure of group knowledge structure convergence. A presentation at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications & Technology, November. Jacksonville, FL: AECT. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/AECT_2011.pdf
9. Clariana, R. B., Engelmann, T., & Yu, W. (2013). Using centrality of concept maps as a measure of problem space states in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 423–442.
10. Curşeu, P. L., Schalk, M. J. D., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2010). The use of cognitive mapping in eliciting and evaluating group cognitions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,40, 1258–1291.
11. Dooling, D. J., & Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 216–222.
12. Dooling, D. J., & Mullet, R. L. (1973). Locus of thematic effects in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 404–406.
13. Dynarski, M., Honey, M., & Levin, D. (2002). Designing a study of the effectiveness of education technology: Background material for the first meeting of the Technical Writing Group. U.S. Department of Education, Nov, 2002. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/background.pdf.
14. Engelmann, T., Kozlov, M. D., Kolodziej, R., & Clariana, R. B. (2014). Fostering group norm development and orientation while creating awareness contents for improving net-based collaborative problem solving, Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 298–306.
15. Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization,5, 202–210.
16. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external knowledge representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,14, 405–441.
17. Garbis, C., & Artman, H. (1998). Team communication and coordination as distributed cognition. In: Coop Third International Conference on the design of cooperative systems, Cannes, France. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:479674/FTTSLTEXT01.Pdf.
18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 217–263). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,22, 340–374.
20. Gijlers, H., Saab, H. N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: How instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,25, 252–267.
21. Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A. M., Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,8, 427–453.
22. Hancock, C. H. (1940). An evaluation of certain popular science misconceptions. Science Education,24(4), 208–213. doi:10.1002/sce.3730240409.
23. Hay, D. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education and Training,48, 127–142. doi:10.1108/00400910610651764.
24. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences,16, 307–331. doi:10.1080/10508400701413401.
25. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr, & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 44–55.
26. Jonassen, D. H. (1985). The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
27. Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,47, 61–79.
28. Kinchin, I. M. (2013). Concept mapping and the fundamental problem of moving between knowledge structures. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers,4, 96–106.
29. Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research,42, 43–57.
30. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction,18, 13–49.
31. Larson, J. R., Jr, Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). The discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67, 446–461.
32. Lemarié, J., Lorch, R. F., & Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (2012). Understanding how headings influence text processing, Discours, 10. http://discours.revues.org/8600.
33. Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review,1, 209–234.
34. Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology,85, 281–290.
35. Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language,24, 350–362.
36. Lu, L., Yuan, Y. C., & McLeod, P. L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review,16, 54–75.
37. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of the top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly,16, 72–103.
38. Meyer, B. J. F., Ray, M. N., & Middlemiss, W. (2012). Children’s use of comparative text signals: The relationship between age and comprehension ability. Discours [En ligne]. http://discours.revues.org/8637.
39. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research,76, 413–448.
40. Ray, M. N., & Meyer, B. J. F. (2011). Individual differences in children’s knowledge of expository text structures: A review of literature. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education,4, 67–82.
41. Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science,29, 1045–1060.
42. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413. http://www.eyethink.org/resources/lab_papers/Richardson2007_The_Art_of_Con.pdf.
43. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 508–517.
44. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,2, 235–276.
45. Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,8, 375–397.
46. Smith, E. E., & Swinney, D. (1992). The role of schemas in reading text: A teal-time examination. Discourse Processes,15, 303–316.
47. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48, 1467–1478.
48. Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology,103(2), 255–262.
49. Taricani, E. M., & Clariana, R. B. (2006). A technique for automatically scoring open-ended concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 61–78.
50. Thompson, B. (1999). Common methodology mistakes in educational research, revisited, along with a primer on both effect sizes and the bootstrap. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED429110.
51. Tinsley, H. E. A., & Brown, S. D. (2000). Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (Eds.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction,17, 416–426.
53. Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition,28, 1011–1021.
54. Worchel, S., Coutant-Sassic, D., & Grossman, M. (1992). A developmental approach to group dynamics: A model and illustrative research. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 181–202). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Wyer, R. S. (1988). Social memory and social judgment. In Paul. R. Solomon, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on memory research. New York, NY: Springer.
56. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences,18, 7–44.