Assisted reproductive technology and gamete/embryo-fetal origins of diseases

Gamete and Embryo-Fetal Origins of Adult Diseases

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 197-219

  Zhu, Yi Min ^a,b   Hu, Xiao Ling ^a,b   Wu, Yan Ting ^a,b   Feng, Chun ^a,b   Huang, He Feng ^a,b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Zhejiang University School of Medicine   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925467510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7772-9_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Motrenko T. Embryo-fetal origin of diseases-new approach on epigenetic reprogramming. Arch Perinat Med. 2010;6:11-5.
2. Savage T, Peek J, Hofman PL, et al. Childhood outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2392-400.
3. Ludwig AK, Sutcliffe AG, Diedrich K, et al. Post-neonatal health and development of children born after assisted reproduction: a systematic review of controlled studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127:3-25.
4. Cetin I, Cozzi V, Antonazzo P. Fetal development after assisted reproduction-a review. Placenta. 2003;24:S104-13.
5. Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Vermeiden JP, et al. Growth and development of children born after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1662-73.
6. Rosenwaks Z, Bendikson K. Further evidence of the safety of assisted reproductive technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5709-10.
7. Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. Outcome of assisted reproduction. Lancet. 2007;370:351-9.
8. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Flowers L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012;61:1-23.
9. Hazekamp J, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Hovatta O, et al. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: consideration of new strategies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1217-19.
10. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, et al. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. 2006;333:679.
11. de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, et al. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2310-20.
12. Kalra SK, Molinaro TA. The association of in vitro fertilization and perinatal morbidity. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:423-35.
13. Welmerink DB, Voigt LF, Daling JR, et al. Infertility treatment use in relation to selected adverse birth outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2580-6.
14. Steel AJ, Sutcliffe A. Long-term health implications for children conceived by IVF/ICSI. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009;12(1):21-7.
15. Diaz-Garcia C, Estella C, Perales-Puchalt A, et al. Reproductive medicine and inheritance of infertility by offspring: the role of fetal programming. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:536-45.
16. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2008;372:737-43.
17. Basatemur E, Sutcliffe A. Follow-up of children born after ART. Placenta. 2008;29: 135-40.
18. Lidegaard O, Pinborg A, Andersen AN. Imprinting diseases and IVF: Danish National IVF cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:950-4.
19. Stromberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, et al. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;359:461-5.
20. Middelburg KJ, Haadsma ML, Heineman MJ, et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro fertilization procedure do not influence early neuromotor development; a history of subfertility does. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:544-53.
21. Kramer S, Ward E, Meadows AT, et al. Medical and drug risk factors associated with neuro-blastoma: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;78:797-804.
22. Skora D, Frankfurter D. Adverse perinatal events associated with ART. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30:84-91.
23. Moll AC, Imhof SM, Cruysberg JR, et al. Incidence of retinoblastoma in children born after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 2003;361:309-10.
24. Bruinsma F, Venn A, Lancaster P, et al. Incidence of cancer in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:604-7.
25. Vulliemoz NR, McVeigh E, Kurinczuk J. In vitro fertilisation: perinatal risks and early childhood outcomes. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2012;15:62-8.
26. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1331-7. e1-4.
27. Bukulmez O. Does assisted reproductive technology cause birth defects. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:260-4.
28. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1803-13.
29. Odom LN, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17:517-22.
30. Eroglu A, Layman LC. Role of ART in imprinting disorders. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30: 92-104.
31. Kuentz P, Bailly A, Faure AC, et al. Child with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born after assisted reproductive techniques to an human immunodeficiency virus serodiscordant couple. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:e35-8.
32. Choufani S, Shuman C, Weksberg R. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C:343-54.
33. Manipalviratn S, DeCherney A, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:305-15.
34. Owen CM, Segars Jr JH. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:417-28.
35. Fortier AL, Lopes FL, Darricarrere N, et al. Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1653-65.
36. Stouder C, Deutsch S, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Superovulation in mice alters the methylation pattern of imprinted genes in the sperm of the offspring. Reprod Toxicol. 2009;28:536-41.
37. Market-Velker BA, Zhang L, Magri LS, et al. Dual effects of superovulation: loss of maternal and paternal imprinted methylation in a dose-dependent manner. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:36-51.
38. Wilkins-Haug L. Assisted reproductive technology, congenital malformations, and epigenetic disease. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51:96-105.
39. Marchesi DE, Qiao J, Feng HL. Embryo manipulation and imprinting. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30:323-34.
40. Gilchrist RB. Recent insights into oocyte-follicle cell interactions provide opportunities for the development of new approaches to in vitro maturation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;23:23-31.
41. Son WY, Tan SL. Laboratory and embryological aspects of hCG-primed in vitro maturation cycles for patients with polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:675-89.
42. Suikkari AM. In-vitro maturation: its role in fertility treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:242-8.
43. Sutton ML, Gilchrist RB, Thompson JG. Effects of in-vivo and in-vitro environments on the metabolism of the cumulus-oocyte complex and its influence on oocyte developmental capacity. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:35-48.
44. Merriman JA, Whittingham DG, Carroll J. The effect of follicle stimulating hormone and epidermal growth factor on the developmental capacity of in-vitro matured mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:690-5.
45. Vanderhyden BC, Armstrong DT. Role of cumulus cells and serum on the in vitro maturation, fertilization, and subsequent development of rat oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1989;40:720-8.
46. Singh J, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Promise of new imaging technologies for assessing ovarian function. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;78:371-99.
47. Ye J, Campbell KH, Craigon J, et al. Dynamic changes in meiotic progression and improvement of developmental competence of pig oocytes in vitro by follicle-stimulating hormone and cycloheximide. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:399-406.
48. Lin YH, Hwang JL. In vitro maturation of human oocytes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;45:95-9.
49. Cha K Y, Chung HM, Lee DR, et al. Obstetric outcome of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated by in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1461-5.
50. Holzer H, Scharf E, Chian RC, et al. In vitro maturation of oocytes collected from unstimulated ovaries for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:62-7.
51. Li Y, Feng HL, Cao YJ, et al. Confocal microscopic analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:827-32.
52. Shu-Chi M, Jiann-Loung H, Yu-Hung L, et al. Growth and development of children conceived by in-vitro maturation of human oocytes. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:677-82.
53. Trounson A, Wood C, Kausche A. In vitro maturation and the fertilization and developmental competence of oocytes recovered from untreated polycystic ovarian patients. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:353-62.
54. Cao YX, Chian RC. Fertility preservation with immature and in vitro matured oocytes. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:456-64.
55. Lucifero D, Chaillet JR, Trasler JM. Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:3-18.
56. Palermo GD, Neri Q V, Takeuchi T, et al. Genetic and epigenetic characteristics of ICSI children. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:820-33.
57. Price TM, Murphy SK, Younglai EV. Perspectives: the possible influence of assisted reproductive technologies on transgenerational reproductive effects of environmental endocrine disruptors. Toxicol Sci. 2007;96:218-26.
58. Palermo GD, Neri Q V, Takeuchi T, et al. ICSI: where we have been and where we are going. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:191-201.
59. Fulka H, Fulka Jr J. No differences in the DNA methylation pattern in mouse zygotes produced in vivo, in vitro, or by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1534-6.
60. Santos F, Hyslop L, Stojkovic P, et al. Evaluation of epigenetic marks in human embryos derived from IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2387-95.
61. Tierling S, Souren NY, Gries J, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human. J Med Genet. 2010;47:371-6.
62. Feng C, Tian S, Zhang Y, et al. General imprinting status is stable in assisted reproduction-conceived offspring. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1417-1423.e9.
63. de Waal E, Yamazaki Y, Ingale P, et al. Gonadotropin stimulation contributes to an increased incidence of epimutations in ICSI-derived mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:4460-72.
64. Dommering CJ, van der Hout AH, Meijers-Heijboer H, Marees T, Moll AC. IVF and retino-blastoma revisited. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1):79-81.
65. Alukal JP, Lamb DJ. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-what are the risks. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:277-88. Ix-x.
66. Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, et al. Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet. 1998;351:1529-34.
67. Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Saunders K, et al. Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study. Lancet. 2001;357:2080-4.
68. Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:413-19.
69. Rajender S, Avery K, Agarwal A. Epigenetics, spermatogenesis and male infertility. Mutat Res. 2011;727:62-71.
70. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:727-33.
71. Avendano C, Franchi A, Taylor S, et al. Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1077-84.
72. Avendano C, Franchi A, Duran H, et al. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:549-57.
73. Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Moreira PN, Perez-Crespo M, et al. Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod. 2008;78:761-72.
74. Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, et al. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl. 2006;27:176-88.
75. Woldringh GH, Besselink DE, Tillema AH, et al. Karyotyping, congenital anomalies and follow-up of children after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with non-ejaculated sperm: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:12-9.
76. Paoloni-Giacobino A. Implications of reproductive technologies for birth and developmental outcomes: imprinting defects and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2006;8:1-14.
77. Sutcliffe AG, Manning JT, Katalanic A, et al. Perturbations in finger length and digit ratio (2D:4D) in ICSI children. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:138-43.
78. van der Heijden GW, van den Berg IM, Baart EB, et al. Parental origin of chromatin in human monopronuclear zygotes revealed by asymmetric histone methylation patterns, differs between IVF and ICSI. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76:101-8.
79. Qiao J, Chen Y, Yan LY, et al. Changes in histone methylation during human oocyte maturation and IVF-or ICSI-derived embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1628-36.
80. Yoshizawa Y, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, et al. Impaired active demethylation of the paternal genome in pronuclear-stage rat zygotes produced by in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77:69-75.
81. Ajduk A, Yamauchi Y, Ward MA. Sperm chromatin remodeling after intracytoplasmic sperm injection differs from that of in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod. 2006;75:442-51.
82. Zhang YL, Chen T, Jiang Y, et al. Active demethylation of individual genes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection rabbit embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005;72:530-3.
83. Perry AC, Wakayama T, Kishikawa H, et al. Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Science. 1999;284:1180-3.
84. Chan AW, Luetjens CM, Dominko T, et al. Foreign DNA transmission by ICSI: injection of spermatozoa bound with exogenous DNA results in embryonic GFP expression and live rhesus monkey births. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:26-33.
85. Moreira PN, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Rizos D, et al. Inadvertent transgenesis by conventional ICSI in mice. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3313-17.
86. Ronquist GK, Larsson A, Ronquist G, et al. Prostasomal DNA characterization and transfer into human sperm. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:467-76.
87. de Waal E, Yamazaki Y, Ingale P, et al. Primary epimutations introduced during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are corrected by germline-specific epigenetic reprogramming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4163-8.
88. Ciapa B, Arnoult C. Could modifications of signalling pathways activated after ICSI induce a potential risk of epigenetic defects. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55:143-52.
89. Zechner U, Pliushch G, Schneider E, et al. Quantitative methylation analysis of developmen-tally important genes in human pregnancy losses after ART and spontaneous conception. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:704-13.
90. Okamoto I, Otte AP, Allis CD, et al. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science. 2004;303:644-9.
91. Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2818-25.
92. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplanta-tion genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9-17.
93. Duncan FE, Stein P, Williams CJ, et al. The effect of blastomere biopsy on preimplantation mouse embryo development and global gene expression. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1462-5.
94. Yu Y, Wu J, Fan Y, et al. Evaluation of blastomere biopsy using a mouse model indicates the potential high risk of neurodegenerative disorders in the offspring. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1490-500.
95. Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:449-54.
96. Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, et al. Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:357-63.
97. Vutyavanich T, Sreshthaputra O, Mongkolchaipak S, et al. Slow programmable and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34:457-63.
98. Henningsen AK, Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:959-63.
99. Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2227-38.
100. Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1343-50.
101. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris HAK, et al. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1320-7.
102. Nakashima A, Araki R, Tani H, et al. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight: an analysis of 25, 777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry of Japan. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):450-5.
103. Shih W, Rushford DD, Bourne H, et al. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1644-53.
104. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, et al. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:611-17.
105. Nelissen EC, Van Montfoort AP, Coonen E, et al. Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1966-76.
106. Wennerholm UB, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Bergh C, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2158-72.
107. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:368-77. e1-9.
108. Basso O, Baird DD. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and Caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2478-84.
109. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, et al. The sex ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1579-85.
110. Fedder J, Gabrielsen A, Humaidan P, et al. Malformation rate and sex ratio in 412 children conceived with epididymal or testicular sperm. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1080-5.
111. Rubessa M, Boccia L, Campanile G, et al. Effect of energy source during culture on in vitro embryo development, resistance to cryopreservation and sex ratio. Theriogenology. 2011;76: 1347-55.
112. Lin P Y, Huang FJ, Kung FT, et al. Comparison of the offspring sex ratio between fresh and vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1764-6.
113. Nakajo Y, Fukunaga N, Fuchinoue K, et al. Physical and mental development of children after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Reprod Med Biol. 2004;3:63-7.
114. Olson CK, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Romitti PA, et al. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1308-15.
115. Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:277-85.