Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology

Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 517-522

  Odom, Lawrence N ^a   Segars, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Angelman syndrome; assisted reproductive technology; Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome; DNA methylation; imprinting disorders

Indexed keywords

DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 3A; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 3B; H19 PROTEIN; PEG1 PROTEIN; POTASSIUM CHANNEL KCNQ1; PROTEIN; S ADENOSYLMETHIONINE; SNRPN PROTEIN; SOMATOMEDIN B RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BECKWITH WIEDEMANN SYNDROME; CHROMOSOME 11P; CPG ISLAND; DIABETES MELLITUS; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISORDER; GENOME IMPRINTING; HAPPY PUPPET SYNDROME; HUMAN; IMPRINTING DISORDER; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; KIDNEY CANCER; MATERNAL HYPOMETHYLATION SYNDROME; POINT MUTATION; PRADER WILLI SYNDROME; PROTEIN PROCESSING; RETINOBLASTOMA; REVIEW; SILVER RUSSELL SYNDROME; SPERMATID; TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION; TRANSIENT NEONATAL DIABETES MELLITUS; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

ANGELMAN SYNDROME; ANIMALS; BECKWITH-WIEDEMANN SYNDROME; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RISK;

EID: 78649317764     PISSN: 1752296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32834040a3     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Repro-ductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
2. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART). World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 2002. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:2310-2320.
3. Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev 2009; 23:781-783.
4. Holliday R, Pugh JE. DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 1975; 187:226-232.
5. Goll MG, Bestor TH. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem 2005; 74:481-514.
6. Bestor TH. The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9:2395-2402.
7. Yoder JA, Soman N, Verdine GL, Bestor TH. DNA methyltransferases in mouse tissues and cells. Studies with a mechanism-based probe. J Mol Biol 1997; 270:385-395.
8. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999; 99:247-257.
9. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation ofgeneexpression: howthegenome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 2003; 33 (Suppl): 245-254.
10. Koerner MV, Barlow DP. Genomic imprinting-an epigenetic gene-regulatory model. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010; 20:164-170.
11. Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 1993; 366:362-365.
12. Neumann B, Kubicka P, Barlow DP. Characteristics of imprinted genes. Nat Genet 1995; 9:12-13.
13. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian devel-opment. Science 2001; 293:1089-1093.
14. Morison IM, Paton CJ, Cleverley SD. The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:275-276.
15. Lucifero D, Mertineit C, Clarke HJ, et al. Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells. Genomics 2002; 79:530-538.
16. Tesarik J, Sousa M, Greco E, Mendoza C. Spermatidsasgametes: indications and limitations. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (Suppl 3):89-107.
17. Shieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:731-737. (Pubitemid 34983993)
18. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injections and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:725-730.
19. Cox GF, Burger J, Lip V, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71:162-164.
20. Orstavik KH, Eiklid K, van der Hagen CB, et al. Another case of imprinting defect in a girl with Angelman syndrome who was conceived by intracyto-plasmic semen injection. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:218-219.
21. Lidegaard O, Pinborg A, Anderson AN. Imprinting diseases and IVF: Danish National IVF cohort study. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:950-954.
22. Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Grob S, et al. Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J Med Genet 2005; 42:289-291.
23. Sutcliffe AG, Peters CJ, Bowdin S, et al. Assisted reproductive therapies and imprinting disorders: a preliminary British survey. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:1009-1011.
24. Doornbos ME, Maas SM, McDonnell J, et al. Infertility, assisted reproduction technologies and imprinting disturbances: a Dutch study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:2476-2480.
25. DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, Fienberg AP. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:156-160.
26. Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, et al. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART).J Med Genet 2003; 40:62-64.
27. Gicquel C,Gaston V, Mandelbaum J, et al. In vitrofertilization mayincreasethe riskof Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome related to the abnormal imprinting of the KCN10T gene. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:1338-1341.
28. Halliday J, Oke K, Breheny S, et al. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and IVF: a case-control study. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75:526-528.
29. Chang AS, Moley KH, Wangler M, et al. Association between Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromeand assisted reproductivetechnology:acaseseriesof 19 patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:349-354.
30. Rossignol S, Steunou V, Chalas C, et al. The epigenetic imprinting defect of patientswith Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born afterassisted reproduc-tive technology is not restricted to the 11p15 region. J Med Genet 2006; 43:902-907.
31. Bowdin S, Allen C, Kirby G, et al.Asurveyofassisted reproductivetechnology births and imprinting disorders. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:3237-3240.
32. Lim D, Bowdin SC, Tee L, et al. Clinical and molecular genetic features of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:741-747.
33. Strawn EY, Bick D, Swanson A. Is it the patient or the IVF? Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome in both spontaneous and assisted reproductive conceptions. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:754.e1-e2.
34. Williams CA, Driscoll DJ. Angelman syndrome. Gene Reviews at Gene Tests: Medical Genetics Information Resource (database online). Seattle: University of Washington; 2007.
35. Clayton-Smith J, Laan L. Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects. J Med Genet 2003; 40:87-95.
36. Shuman C, Smith AC, Weksberg R. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Gene Reviews at Gene Tests: Medical Genetics Information Resource (data-base online). Seattle: University of Washington; 2005.
37. Armor DJ, Halliday J. A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:2826-2834.
38. Tierling S, Souren NY, Gries J, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human. J Med Genet 2010; 47:371-376.
39. Katari S, Turan N, Bibikova M, et al. DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18:3769-3778.
40. Manning M, Lissens W, Bonduelle M, et al.Studyof DNA-methylation patterns at chromosome 15q11-q1 3 in children born after ICSI reveals no imprinting defects. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:1049-1053.
41. Neri QV, Takeuchi T, Palermo GD. An update of assisted reproductive tech-nologies results in the United States. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1127:41-48.
42. Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningson AK, et al. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen emryo replacement: The Danish National Cohort Study 1995-2006. Fertil Steril 2009; 94:1320-1327.
43. Gomes MV, Huber J, Ferriani RA, et al. Abnormal methylation at the KvDMR1 imprinting control region in clinically normal children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 15:471-477.