Phenotypic integration in style dimorphic daffodils (Narcissus, Amaryllidaceae) with different pollinators

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 369, Issue 1649, 2014, Pages

  Pérez Barrales, Rocío ^a,b   Simón Porcar, Violeta I ^b   Santos Gally, Rocío ^b   Arroyo, Juan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Genetic diversity; Phenotypic selection; Plasticity; Pollinator mediated selection; Style dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; FLORAL TRAIT; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GENETIC VARIATION; MONOCOTYLEDON; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POLLINATOR;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INSECT; NARCISSUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; FLOWERS; GENETIC VARIATION; INSECTS; NARCISSUS; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84925359792     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0258     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Olson EC, Miller RL. 1958 Morphological integration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Berg RL. 1960 The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14, 171-180. (doi: 10. 2307/2405824).
3. Cheverud JM. 1982 Phenotypic, genetic and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36, 499-516. (doi: 10. 2307/2408096).
4. Cheverud JM. 1988 A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42, 958-968. (doi: 10. 2307/2408911).
5. Arnold SJ. 1992 Constraints in phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140, S85-S107. (doi: 10. 1086/285398).
6. Armbruster WS, Schwaegerle KE. 1996 Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 261-276. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1420-9101. 1996. 9030261. x).
7. Pigliucci M, Preston K. 2004 Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Hallgrimsson B, Brian KH. 2011 Epigenetics: linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Courtney JM. 2012 The integrated phenotype. Integr. Comp. Biol. 52, 64-76. (doi: 10. 1093/icb/ics043).
10. Klingenberg CP, Zaklan SD. 2007 Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54, 1273-1285. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 0014-3820. 2000. tb00560. x).
11. Sanchez JA, Lasker HR. 2003 Patterns of morphological integration in marine modular organisms: supra-module organization in branching octocoral colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2039-2044. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2003. 2471).
12. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ, Cheverud JM. 2004 Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166, 1909-1921. (doi: 10. 1534/genetics. 166. 4. 1909).
13. Goswami A. 2006 Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am. Nat. 168, 270-280. (doi: 10. 1086/505758).
14. Pavlicev M, Kenney-Hunt JP, Norgard EA, Roseman CC, Wolf JB, Cheverud JM. 2008 Genetic variation in pleiotropy: differential epistasis as a source of variation in the allometric relationship between long bone lengths and body weight. Evolution 62, 199-213.
15. Badayaev AV. 2010 The beak of the other finch: coevolution of genetic covariance structure and developmental modularity during adaptive evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1111-1126. (doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2009. 0285).
16. Sanger TJ, Mahler DL, Abzhanov A, Losos JB. 2012 Roles for modularity and constraint in the evolution of cranial diversity among Anolis lizards. Evolution 66, 1525-1542. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1558-5646. 2011. 01519. x).
17. Waitt DE, Levin DA. 1998 Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 80, 310-319. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2540. 1998. 00298. x).
18. Armbruster WS, Di Stilio VS, Tuxill JD, Flores TC, Velásques Runk JL. 1999 Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: a reevaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept. Am. J. Bot. 86, 39-55. (doi: 10. 2307/2656953).
19. Conner JK. 2002 Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420, 407-410. (doi: 10. 1038/nature01105).
20. Pélabon C, Osler NC, Dielmann N, Graae BJ. 2013 Decoupled phenotypic variation between floral and vegetative traits: distinguishing between developmental and environmental correlations. Ann. Bot. 111, 935-944. (doi: 10. 1093/aob/mct050).
21. Terentjev PV. 1931 Biometrische untersuchungen über die morphologischen Merk-male von Rana ridibunda Pall. (Amphinia, Salientia). Biometrika 23, 23-51.
22. Berg RL. 1959 A general evolutionary principle underlying the origin of developmental homeostasis. Am. Nat. 93, 103-105. (doi: 10. 1086/282061).
23. Conner J, Via S. 1993 Patterns of phenotypic and genetic correlations among morphological and lifehistory traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Evolution 47, 704-711. (doi: 10. 2307/2410086).
24. Conner JK, Sterling A. 1996 Selection for independence of floral and vegetative traits: evidence from correlation patterns in five species. Can. J. Bot. 74, 642-644. (doi: 10. 1139/b96-080).
25. Herrera J. 2001 The variability of organs differentially involved in pollination, and correlations of traits in Genisteae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Ann. Bot. 88, 1027-1037. (doi: 10. 1006/anbo. 2001. 1541).
26. Herrera CM, Cerdá X, García MB, Guitián J, Medrano M, Rey PJ, Sánchez-Lafuente AM. 2002 Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 108-121. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1420-9101. 2002. 00365. x).
27. Murren CJ. 2002 Phenotypic integration in plants. Plant Species Biol. 17, 89-99. (doi: 10. 1046/j. 1442-1984. 2002. 00079. x).
28. Hansen TF, Pelabon C, Armbruster WS. 2007 Comparing variational properties of homologous floral and vegetative characters in Dalechampia scandens: testing the Berg hypothesis. Evol. Biol. 34, 86-98. (doi: 10. 1007/s11692-007-9006-3).
29. Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Armbruster WS. 2007 Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Oikos 116, 1904-1918. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 0030-1299. 2007. 15994. x).
30. Ordano M, Fornoni J, Boege K, Dominguez CA. 2008 The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration. New Phytol. 179, 1183-1192. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 2008. 02523. x).
31. Conner JK, Sterling A. 1995 Testing hypotheses of functional relationships-a comparative survey of correlation patterns among floral traits in 5 insectpollinated plants. Am. J. Bot. 82, 1399-1406. (doi: 10. 2307/2445866).
32. Bissell EK, Diggle PK. 2010 Modular genetic architecture of floral morphology in Nicotiana: quantitative genetic and comparative phenotypic approaches to floral integration. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1744-1758. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2010. 02040. x).
33. Rush S, Conner JK, Jenneten P. 1995 The effects of natural variation in pollinator visitation on rates of pollen removal in wild radish Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82, 1522-1526. (doi: 10. 2307/2446180).
34. Engel EC, Irwin RE. 2003 Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1612-1618. (doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 90. 11. 1612).
35. Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Hansen TF, Mulder CPH. 2004 Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes (eds M Pigliucci, K Preston), pp. 23-49. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Armbruster WS, Hansen TF, Pélabon C, Pérez-Barrales R, Maad J. 2009 The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns. Ann. Bot. 103, 1529-1545. (doi: 10. 1093/aob/mcp095).
37. Armbruster WS, Pélabon C, Hansen TF, Bolstad GH. 2009 Macroevolutionary patterns of pollination accuracy: a comparison of three genera. New Phytol. 183, 600-617. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 2009. 02930. x).
38. Rosas-Guerrero V, Quesada M, Armbruster WS, Pérez-Barrales R, DeWitt Smith S. 2011 Influence of pollination specialization and breeding system on floral integration and phenotypic variation in Ipomoea. Evolution 65, 350-364. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1558-5646. 2010. 01140. x).
39. Lande R. 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314-334. (doi: 10. 2307/2407703).
40. Goswami A. 2006 Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull. Evolution 60, 169-183. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 0014-3820. 2006. tb01091. x).
41. Pérez F, Arroyo MTK, Medel R. 2007 Phylogenetic analysis of floral integration in Schizanthus (Solanaceae): does pollination truly integrate corolla traits? J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1730-1738. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2007. 01393. x).
42. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226. (doi: 10. 2307/2408842).
43. Eckerrt CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC. 2008 Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol. Ecol. 17, 1170-1188. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-294X. 2007. 03659. x).
44. Eckert CG, Manicacci D, Barrett SCH. 1995 Genetic drift and founder effects in native versus introduced populations of an invading plant, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Evolution 50, 1512-1519. (doi: 10. 2307/2410888).
45. Tremblay RL, Ackerman JD. 2001 Gene flow and effective population size in Lepanthes (Orchidaceae): a case of genetic drift. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 47-62. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1095-8312. 2001. tb01300. x).
46. Manica A, Amos W, Balloux F, Hanihara T. 2007 The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation. Nature 448, 346-348. (doi: 10. 1038/nature05951).
47. Meeus S, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H. 2012 Strong differences in genetic structure across disjunct edge, and core populations of the dystylous forest herb Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). Am. J. Bot. 99, 1809-1818. (doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 1200223).
48. Caley MJ, Cripps E, Game ET. 2013 Phenotypic covariance at species' borders. BMC Biol. 13, 105. (doi: 10. 1186/1471-2148-13-105).
49. Santos-Gally R, Gonzalez-Voyer R, Arroyo J. 2013 Deconstructing heterostyly: the evolutionary role of incompatibility system, pollinators, and floral architecture. Evolution 67, 2072-2082. (doi: 10. 1111/evo. 12087).
50. Arroyo J, Dafni A. 1995 Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytol. 129, 135-145. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 1995. tb03017. x).
51. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J. 1996 Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants (eds DG Lloyd, SCH Barrett), pp. 339-376. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
52. Arroyo J. 2002 Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), la evolución de los polimorfismos florales y la conservación más allá de las 'listas rojas'. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 75, 39-55.
53. Arroyo J, Barrett SCH, Hidalgo R, Cole WW. 2002 Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89, 1242-1249. (doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 89. 8. 1242).
54. Pérez-Barrales R, Pino R, Albaladejo RG, Arroyo J. 2009 Geographic variation of flower traits in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae): do pollinators matter? J. Biogeogr. 36, 1411-1422. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2699. 2008. 01964. x).
55. Santos-Gally R, Pérez-Barrales R, Simón VI, Arroyo J. 2013 The role of short-tongued insects in floral variation across the range of a style dimorphic plant. Ann. Bot. 111, 317-328. (doi: 10. 1093/aob/mcs261).
56. Dulberger R. 1964 Flower dimorphism and selfincompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution 18, 361-363. (doi: 10. 2307/2406347).
57. Thompson JD, Barrett SCH, Baker AM. 2003 Frequency dependent variation in reproductive success in Narcissus: implications for the maintenance of stigmaheight dimorphism. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 949-953. (doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2002. 2318).
58. Cesaro AC, Thompson JD. 2004 Darwin's crosspromotion hypothesis and the evolution of stylar polymorphism. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1209-1215. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2004. 00683. x).
59. Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J. 2010 Pollinator shifts and the loss of style polymorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1117-1128. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2010. 01988. x).
60. Simon-Portcar VI, Santos-Gally R, Arroyo J. 2014 Long-tongued insects promote pollen transfer in style dimorphic Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). J. Ecol. 102, 116-125. (doi: 10. 1111/1365-2745. 12179).
61. Barrett SCH, Harder DH. 2005 The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus). New Phytol. 165, 45-53. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 2004. 01183. x).
62. Hodgins KA, Barrett SCH. 2007 Population structure and genetic diversity in tristylous Narcissus triandrus: insights from microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2317-2332. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-294X. 2007. 03314. x).
63. Pérez-Alquicira J, Molina-Freaner FE, Piñero D, Weller SG, Martínez-Meyer E, Rozas J, Domínguez CA. 2010 The role of historical factors and natural selection in the evolution of breeding systems of Oxalis alpina in the Sonoran desert 'Sky Islands'. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 2163-2175. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2010. 02075. x).
64. Zhou W, Barrett SCH, Wang H, Li DZ. 2012 Loss of floral polymorphism in heterostylous Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae): a molecular phylogeographic perspective. Mol. Ecol. 21, 4631-4645. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-294X. 2012. 05707. x).
65. Kissling J, Barrett SCH. 2013 Variation and evolution of herkogamy in Exochaenium (Gentianaceae): implications for the evolution of distyly. Ann. Bot. 112, 95-102. (doi: 10. 1093/aob/mct097).
66. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992 The evolution of heterostyly. In Evolution and function of heterostyly. (ed. SCH Barrett), pp. 151-178. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
67. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992 The selection of heterostyly. In Evolution and function of heterostyly. (ed. SCH Barrett), pp. 179-207. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
68. Stone JL, Thompson JD. 1994 The evolution of distyly: pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48, 1595-1606. (doi: 10. 2307/2410250).
69. Hodgins KA, Barrett SCH. 2008 Natural selection on floral traits through male and female function in wild populations of the heterostylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Evolution. 62, 1751-1763. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1558-5646. 2008. 00404. x).
70. Ferrero V, Chapela I, Arroyo J, Navarro L. 2011 Reciprocal style polymorphisms are not easily categorised: the case of heterostyly in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Biol. 13, 7-18. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1438-8677. 2009. 00307. x).
71. Ferrero V, Castro S, Sánchez SM, Navarro L. 2011 Stigma-anther reciprocity, pollinators, and pollen transfer efficiency in populations of heterostylous species of Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant. Syst. Evol. 291, 267-276. (doi: 10. 1007/s00606-010-0387-x).
72. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004 Pollination syndroms and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 375-403. (doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 34. 011802. 132347).
73. Cosacov A, Cocucci AA, Sérsic AN. 2014 Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter? Ann. Bot. 113, 251-266. (doi: 10. 1093/aob/mct239).
74. Wagner GP. 1984 On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidences for a non-random organization of quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21, 77-95. (doi: 10. 1007/BF00275224).
75. Cheverud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM. 1989 Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38, 201-213. (doi: 10. 2307/2992282).
76. Manly FJ. 1998 Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
77. R Development Core Team. 2011 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing.
78. Bernartzky R, Tanksley S. 1986 Genetics of actingrelated sequences in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72, 314-324. (doi: 10. 1007/BF00288567).
79. Simón VI, Picó FX, Arroyo J. 2010 New microsatellite loci for Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae) and cross-amplification in other congeneric species. Am. J. Bot. 97, e10-e13. (doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 1000023).
80. Peakall R, Smouse P. 2006 GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288-295. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-8286. 2005. 01155. x).
81. Kalinowski ST. 2005 HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 187-189. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-8286. 2004. 00845. x).
82. Santos-Gally R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2012 Insights into Neogene Mediterranean biogeography based on phylogenetic relationships of mountain and lowland lineages of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). J. Biogeogr. 39, 782-789. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2699. 2011. 02526. x).
83. Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2006 New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytol. 171, 553-567. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8137. 2006. 01819. x).
84. Simón-Portcar V. 2013 Evolutionary ecology of stylar polymorphism in Narcissus papyraceus Ker-Gawl. (Amaryllidaceae). PhD thesis, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.
85. Riska B. 1985 Group size factors and geographic variation of morphometric correlation. Evolution 39, 792-803. (doi: 10. 2307/2408679).
86. Bryant EH, Meffert LM. 1990 Multivariate phenotypic differentiation among bottleneck lines of the housefly. Evolution 44, 660-668. (doi: 10. 2307/2409443).
87. Cresswell JE. 1998 Stabilizing selection and the structural variability of flowers within species. Ann. Bot. 81, 463-473. (doi: 10. 1006/anbo. 1998. 0594).
88. Cresswell JE. 2000 Manipulation of female architecture in flowers reveals a narrow optimum for pollen deposition. Ecology 81, 3244-3249. (doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3244: MOFAIF]2. 0. CO; 2).
89. Faivre AE. 2000 Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from herkogamous ancestor. Evolution 54, 847-858. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 0014-3820. 2000. tb00085. x).
90. Faivre AE, McDade LA. 2001 Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly? Am. J. Bot. 88, 841-853. (doi: 10. 2307/2657036).
91. Ashman TL, Majetic CJ. 2006 Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96, 343-352. (doi: 10. 1038/sj. hdy. 6800815).
92. Thompson JD, Cesaro AC, Arroyo J. 2012 Morph ratio variation and sex organ reciprocity in styledimorphic Narcissus assoanus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 173, 885-893. (doi: 10. 1086/667231).
93. Webb CJ, Lloyd DG. 1986 The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiospems II. Herkogamy. N. Z. J. Bot. 24, 163-178. (doi: 10. 1080/0028825X. 1986. 10409726).
94. Cesaro AC, Barrett SCH, Maurice S, Vaissiere BE, Thompson JD. 2004 An experimental evaluation of self-interference in Narcissus assoanus: functional and evolutionary implications. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1367-1376. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2004. 00767. x).