Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from a herkogamous ancestor

Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 847-858

  Faivre, Amy E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distyly; Floral development; Herkogamy; Heterostyly; Ontogeny; Psychotria; Rubiaceae

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; HETEROSTYLY; ONTOGENY;

BOUVARDIA TERNIFOLIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PSYCHOTRIA; PSYCHOTRIA BRACHIATA; PSYCHOTRIA CHIAPENSIS; PSYCHOTRIA PITTIERI; PSYCHOTRIA POEPPIGIANA; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 0033940621     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00085.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, W. 1973. A morphological hypothesis for the origin of heterostyly in the Rubiaceae. Taxon 22:537-542.
2. Bahadur, B. 1968. Heterostyly in Rubiaceae. A review. J. of Osmania Univ. (Science) Gold. Jubilee Vol.:207-238.
3. Baker, H. G. 1966. The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20:349-68.
4. Barren, S. C. H. 1990. The evolutionary and adaptive significance of heterostyly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:144-148.
5. _. 1992a. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
6. _. 1992b. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis. Pp. 1-29 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
7. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. Am. Nat. 114:467-498.
8. Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London.
9. Diggle, P. K. 1992. Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters. Pp. 326-355 in R. E. Wyatt, ed. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman and Hall, New York.
10. Faivre, A. E. 1998. Form, function, and ontogeny of three heterostylous species of Rubiaceae. Ph.D. diss., University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
11. Fenster, C. B., P. K. Diggle, S. C. H. Barrett, and K. Ritland. 1995. The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Heredity 74:258-266.
12. Friedman, W. E., and J. S. Carmichael. 1998. Heterochrony and developmental innovation: evolution of female gametophyte ontogeny in Gnetum, a highly apomorphic seed plant. Evolution 52:1016-1030.
13. Ganders, F. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. N. Z. J. Bot. 17: 607-635.
14. Gibson, J. P., and P. K. Diggle. 1998. Flower development and male sterility in Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae): a gynodioecious tropical tree. Int. J. Plant Sci. 159:405-417.
15. Guerrant, E. O. 1982. Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae): a hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36:699-712.
16. Hamilton, C. W. 1990. Variations on a distylous theme in Mesoamerican Psychotria subgenus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). Mem. NY Bot. Gard. 55:62-75.
17. Hill, J. P., E. M. Lord, and R. G. Shaw. 1992. Morphological and growth rate differences among outcrossing and self-pollinating races of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 5: 559-573.
18. Hufford, L. D. 1988. Roles of early ontogenetic modifications in the evolution of floral form of Eucnide (Loasaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109:289-333.
19. _. 1997. The roles of ontogenetic evolution in the origins of floral homoplasies. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158:S65-S80.
20. Kearns, C., and D. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Univ. Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.
21. Kellogg, E. A. 1990. Ontogenetic studies of florets in Poa (Gramineae): allometry and heterochrony. Evolution 44:1978-1989.
22. Kowalewski, M., E. Dyreson, J. D. Marcot, J. A. Vargas, K. W. Flessa, and D. P. Hallman. 1997. Phenetic discrimination of biometric simpletons: paleobiological implications of morphospecies in the ligulide brachiopod Glottidia. Paleobiology 23: 444-469.
23. Lloyd, D., and C. Webb. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. Pp. 151-178 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
24. _. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. Pp. 179-207 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
25. Lord, E. M. 1982. Floral morphogenesis in Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiatae) with a model for the evolution of the cleistogamous flower. Bot. Gaz. 143:63-72.
26. Lord, E. M., and J. P. Hill. 1987. Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. Pp. 47-70 in R. A. Raff and E. C. Raff, eds. Development as an evolutionary process. Alan Liss, New York.
27. Nepokroeff, M., B. Bremer, and K. Sytsma. 1999. Reorganization of the genus Psychotria and tribe Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae) inferred from ITS and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24:5-27.
28. Optimas 5.2. 1995. Optimas 5.2. 7th ed. Optimas Corporation, Bothell, WA.
29. Richards, J. H., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1984. The developmental basis of tristyly in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 71:1347-1363.
30. _. 1987. Development of tristyly in Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae) I. Mature floral structure and patterns of relative growth of reproductive organs. Am. J. Bot. 74:1831-1841.
31. _. 1992. The development of heterostyly. Pp. 85-127 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
32. Richards, J. H., and S. Koptur. 1993. Floral variation and distyly in Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80:31-40.
33. Riveros, M., O. Barria, and P. Humaña. 1995. Self-compatibility in distylous Hedyotis salzmannii (Rubiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 194:1-8.
34. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. Vers. 6. 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
35. Steyermark, J. 1972. Rubiaceae. Pp. 227-832 in B. Maguire, ed. The botany of the Guyana highlands. Part IX. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden no. 23.
36. Stone, J., and J. Thomson. 1994. The evolution of distyly: pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48:1595-1606.
37. Webb, C., and D. Lloyd. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. N. Z. J. Bot. 24:163-178.