Ulmus laevis in the iberian peninsula: A review of its ecology and conservation

IForest

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 135-142

  Venturas, Martin ^a   Fuentes Utrilla, Pablo ^b   López, Rosana ^a   Perea, Ramón ^a   Fernández, Victoria ^a   Gascó, Antonio ^c   Guzmán, Paula ^a   Li, Meng ^a   Rodríguez Calcerrada, Jesús ^a   Miranda, Eva ^a   Domínguez, Jorge ^a   González Gordaliza, Guillermo ^a   Zafra, Elena ^a   Fajardo Alcántara, Miriam ^a   Martín, Juan A ^a   Ennos, Richard ^d   Nanos, Nikos ^a   Lucena, Juan J ^e   Iglesias, Salustiano ^f   Collada, Carmen ^a   Gil, Luis ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c IE UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^f Alimentación y Medio Ambiente   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drought stress Vulnerability; Elm Conservation; Population Genetics; Root Iron Uptake; Seed Dispersal; Seed Predation; Ulmus laevis Distribution

Indexed keywords

ULMUS; ULMUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84925305485     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1201-008     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abadía J, Vázquez S, Rellán-Álvarez R, El-Jendoubi H, Abadía A, Álvarez-Fernández A, López-Millán AF (2011). Towards a knowledgebased correction of iron chlorosis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 49: 471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.026
2. Aizpuru I, Aseginolaza C, Uribe-Echebarría PM, Urrutia P, Zorrakin I (1999). Claves ilustradas de la flora del País Vasco y territorios limítrofes [Illustrated key for the flora of the Basque Country and neighboring regions]. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasc, Vitoria, Spain, pp. 99-100. [in Spanish]
3. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EHT, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risk for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 660-684. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
4. Amo M (1871). Flora fanerogámica de la peninsula ibérica o descripción de las plantas cotiledóneas que crecen en España y Portugal [Phanerogam flora of the Iberian Peninsula or description of the cotyledonous plants growing in Spain and Portugal]. Tomo II. Granada, Spain, pp. 81-83. [in Spanish]
5. Anonymous (2000). Lista roja de flora vascular española (valoración según categorías UICN) [Red list of the Spanish vascular flora (assessment following IUCN criteria)]. Conservación Vegetal 6: 11-38. [in Spanish]
6. Barigah TS, Charrier O, Douris M, Bonhomme M, Herbette S, Améglio T, Fichot R, Brignolas F, Cochard H (2013). Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar. Annals of Botany 112: 1431-1437. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct204
7. Bejarano MD, González del Tánago M, de Jalón DG, Marchamalo M, Sordo-Ward A, Solana- Gutiérrez J (2012). Responses of riparian guilds to flow alterations in a Mediterranean stream. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 443-458. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01360.x
8. Black-Samuelsson S, Whiteley RE, Junzhan G (2003). Growth and leaf morphology response to drought stress in the riparian broadleaved tree, Ulmus laevis (Pall.). Silvae Genetica 52: 292-299. [online] URL: http://silvaegenetica.com/fileadmin/content/dokument/archiv/silvaegenetica/52_2003/52-5-6-292.pdf
9. Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ (1996). Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 290-295. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10034-3
10. Brasier CM (2000). Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: “The elms: breeding conservation and disease management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, USA, pp. 61-72.
11. Casadevall J, Font i Quer P (1933). Flora de Catalunya (vol. 5). Institud d’Estudis Catalan, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 153-154. [in Spanish]
12. Ceballos L (1966). Mapa forestal de España, escala 1:400.000 [Forest map of Spain, scale 1:400.000]. Dirección General de Montes, Caza y Pesca Fluvial, Madrid, Spain.
13. Ciçek E, Tilki F (2005). Seed germination of three Ulmus species from Turkey as influenced by temperature and light. Journal of Enviromental Biology 28: 423-425.
14. Ciçek E, Tilki F, Kulaç S, Yilmaz M, Yilmaz F (2007). Survival and growth of three hardwood species (Fraxinus angustifolia, Ulmus laevis and U. minor) on a bottomland site with heavy clay soil. Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 233-237. doi: 10.3923/jps.2007.233.237
15. Cogolludo-Agustín MA, Agúndez D, Gil L (2000). Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157-166. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00740.x
16. Collin E (2003). EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for European white elm (Ulmus laevis). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome, Italy, pp. 6.
17. Collin E, Bilger I, Eriksson G, Turok J (2000). The conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe. In: “The elms: breeding, conservation, and disease management” (Dunn CP ed). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, USA, pp. 281-293.
18. Collin E, Rusanen M, Ackzell L, Bohnens J, de Aguiar A, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Harvengt L, Hollingsworth P, Jenkins G, Meier- Dinkel A, Mittempergher L, Musch B, Nagy L, P’ques M, Pinon J, Piou D, Rotach P, Santini A, Vanden Broeck A, Wolf H (2004). Methods and progress in the conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe. Investigaciones Agrarias: Sistemas y Recursos 13: 261-272.
19. Costa AC (1864). Introducción a la flora de Cataluña y catálogo razonado de las plantas observadas en esta region [Introduction to the flora of Catalonia and reasoned catalogue of the observed plants in this region]. Imprenta del Diario de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 225. [in Spanish]
20. Deiller AF, Walter JMN, Trémolières M (2003). Regeneration strategies in a temperate hardwood floodplain forest of the Upper Rhine: sexual versus vegetative reproduction of woody species. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 215-225. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00600-X
21. Eriksson G (2001). Conservation of noble hardwoods in Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 577-587. doi: 10.1139/x00-134
22. Fuentes-Utrilla P (2008). Estudio de la variabilidad genética del género Ulmus L. en España mediante marcadores moleculares [Study of genetic variability of genus Ulmus L. in Spain using molecular markers]. PhD Thesis, Departamento de Silvopascicultura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, pp. 146. [in Spanish]
23. Fuentes-Utrilla P, Venturas M, Hollingsworth PM, Squirrell J, Collada C, Stone GN, Gil L (2014). Extending glacial refugia for a European tree: genetic markers show that Iberian populations of white elm are native relicts and not introductions. Heredity 112: 105-113. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.81
24. Ghazoul J, Satake A (2009). Nonviable seed set enhances plant fitness: the sacrificial sibling hypothesis. Ecology 90: 369-377. doi: 10.1890/07-1436.1
25. Gil L, García-Nieto ME (1990). Paleobotánica e historia de los olmos de la Península Ibérica [Paleobotany and the history of elms in the Iberian Peninsula]. In: “Los olmos y la grafiosis en España” (Gil L ed). Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación - ICONA, Madrid, Spain, pp. 29-65. [in Spanish]
26. Gil L, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Soto A, Cervera MT, Collada C (2004). English elm is a 2000-yearold Roman clone. Nature 431: 1053. -10.1038/4311053a
27. Glenz C, Schlaepfer R, Iorgulescu I, Kienast F (2006). Flooding tolerance of Central European tree and shrub species. Forest Ecology and Management 235: 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.065
28. Goodall-Copestake WP, Hollingsworth ML, Hollingsworth PM, Jenkins GI, Collin E (2005). Molecular markers and ex situ conservation of the European elms (Ulmus spp.). Biological Conservation 122: 537-546. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.011
29. Hartmann AM, Abarzua S, Schlichting A, Richter DU, Leinweber P, Briese V (2011). Effects of elm bark extracts from Ulmus laevis on human chorion carcinoma cell lines. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 284: 1265-1269. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1830-5
30. Harvengt L, Meier-Dinkel A, Dumas A, Collin E (2004). Establishment of a cryopreserved gene bank of European elms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 43-55. doi: 10.1139/x03-193
31. Hemery GE, Clark JR, Aldinger E, Claessens H, Malvolti ME, O’Connor E, Raftoyannis Y, Savill PS, Brus R (2010). Growing scattered broadleaved tree species in Europe in a changing climate: a review of risks and opportunities. Forestry 83: 65-81. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpp034
32. Heuertz M, Fineschi S, Anzidei M, Pastorelli R, Salvini D, Paule L, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Hardy O, Vekemans X, Vendramin GG (2004). Chloroplast DNA variation and postglacial recolonization of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Europe. Molecular Ecology 13: 3437-3452. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02333.x
33. Hooke JM (2006). Human impacts on fluvial systems in the Mediterranean region. Geomorphology 79: 311-355. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.036
34. Howe HF, Miriti MN (2004). When seed dispersal matters. BioScience 54: 651-660. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0651:WSDM]2.0.CO;2
35. Hulme PE, Borelli T (1999). Variability in post- dispersal seed predation in deciduous woodland: relative importance of location, seed species, burial and density. Plant Ecology 145: 149-156. doi: 10.1023/A:1009821919855
36. Hulme PE, Hunt M (1999). Rodent post-dispersal seed predation in deciduous woodland: predator response to absolute and relative abundance of prey. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 417-428. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00294.x
37. Huntley B, Birks H (1983). Atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe 0-13.000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 667.
38. IUCN (2001). IUCN Red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Cambridge, UK, pp. 32.
39. Janzen DH (1969). Seed eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23: 1-27. doi: 10.2307/2406478
40. Kelly D, Sork VL (2002). Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 427-447. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095433
41. King RA, Ferris C (1998). Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Molecular Ecology 7: 1151-1161. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00432.x
42. Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012). Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63: 131-152. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105522
43. Kozlowski TT (1997). Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Monographs 1: 1-29. [online] URL: http://www.pucrs.br/fabio/fisiovegetal/Encharcamento.pdf
44. Kramer K, Vreugdenhil SJ, van der Werf DC (2008). Effects of flooding on the recruitment, damage and mortality of riparian tree species: a field and simulation study on the Rhine floodplain. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 3893-3903. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.044
45. Lafortezza R, Sanesi G, Chen J (2013). Largescale effects of forest management in Mediterranean landscapes of Europe. iForest 6: 331-335. doi: 10.3832/ifor0941-006
46. Laguna M, de Ávila P (1883). Flora forestal española, que comprende la descripción de los árboles, arbustos y matas que se crían silvestres o asilvestradas en España [Spanish forest flora, which includes the description of trees, shrubs and bushes that are grown wild or naturalized in Spain]. Colegio Nacional de Sordo-Mudos y de Ciegos, Madrid, Spain, pp. 280-287. [in Spanish]
47. Lapeyrouse P (1813). Histoire abrégée des plantes des Pyrénées et itinéraire des botanistes dans ces montagnes [Short history of the plants of the Pyrenees and route followed by the botanists in these mountains]. L’Imprimerie de Bellegarrigue, Toulouse, France, pp. 131-132. [in French]
48. Larbi A, Abadía A, Abadía J, Morales F (2006). Down co-regulation of light absorption, photochemistry, and carboxylation in Fe deficient plants growing in different environments. Photosynthesis Research 89: 113-126. doi: 10.1007/s11120-006-9089-1
49. Loscos F, Pardo J (1866). Serie imperfecta de las plantas aragonesas espontáneas, particularmente de las que habitan la parte meridional [Imperfect series of spontaneous Aragonese plants, particularly those living in the southern part of the region]. Imprenta de Ulpiano Huerta, Alcañiz, Spain, pp. 372. [in Spanish]
50. López R (2003). Paleobotánica de los olmos [Paleobotany of elms]. In: “Los olmos ibéricos. Conservación y mejora frente a la grafiosis” (Gil L, Solla A, Iglesias S eds). Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Madrid, Spain, pp. 49-68. [in Spanish]
51. López R, López de Heredia U, Collada C, Cano FJ, Emerson BC, Cochard H, Gil L (2013). On vulnerability to cavitation, hydraulic efficiency, growth and survival in an insular pine (Pinus canariensis). Annals of Botany 111: 1167-1179. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct084
52. López-Almansa JC, Gil L (2003). Empty samara and parthenocarpy in Ulmus minor s.l. in Spain. Silvae Genetica 52: 241-243. [online] URL: http://xn--rheinischesmuseumfrphilologie-2bd.-com/fileadmin/content/dokument/archiv/silvaegenetica/52_2003/52-5-6-241.pdf
53. López-Almansa JC (2004). Reproductive ecology of riparian elms. Investigaciones Agrarias: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 17-27.
54. López-Almansa JC, Yeung EC, Gil L (2004). Abortive seed development in Ulmus minor Mill. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145: 455-467. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00297.x
55. Machon N, Lefranc M, Bilger I, Henry JP (1995). Isoenzymes as an aid to clarify the taxonomy of French elms. Heredity 74: 39-47. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1995.5
56. Machon N, Lefranc M, Bilger I, Mazer SJ, Sarr A (1997). Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation. Heredity 78: 12-20. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.2
57. Mackenthun GL (2004). The role of Ulmus laevis in German floodplain landscapes. Investigaciones Agrarias: Sistemas y Recursos 13: 55-63.
58. Magri D, Vendramin GG, Comps B, Dupanloup I, Geburek T, Gömöry D, Lataaowa M, Litt T, Paule L, Roure JM, Tantau I, van der Knaap WO, Petit RJ, de Beaulieu JL (2006). A new scenario for the Quaterny history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytologist 171: 199-221. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x
59. Marschner H, Römheld V (1994). Strategies of plants for acquisition of iron. Plant and Soil 165: 261-274. doi: 10.1007/BF00008069
60. Martín-Benito D, García-Vallejo MC, Pajares JA, López D (2005). Triterpenes in elms in Spain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 199-205. doi: 10.1139/x04-158
61. Messenger S (1986). Alkaline runoff, soil pH and white oak manganese deficiency. Tree Physiology 2: 317-325. doi: 10.1093/treephys/2.1-2-3.317
62. Mežaka A, Brumelis G, Piterans A (2012). Tree and stand-scale factors affecting richness and composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in deciduous woodland key habitats. Biodiversity and Conservation 21: 3221-3241. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0361-8
63. Mittempergher L, La Porta N (1991). Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.). Silvae Genetica 40: 237-243.
64. Moritz C (2002). Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51: 238-254. doi: 10.1080/10635150252899752
65. Navarro C, Castroviejo S (1993). Ulmus. In: “Flora Ibérica. Vol. III. Plumbaginaceae (partim) - Capparaceae” (Castroviejo et al. eds). Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, pp. 244-248.
66. Nielsen LR, Kjær ED (2010). Fine-scale gene flow and genetic structure in a relic Ulmus laevis population at its northern range. Tree Genetics and Genomes 6: 643-649. doi: 10.1007/s11295-010-0280-3
67. Niinemets U, Valladares F (2006). Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs 76: 521-547. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0.CO;2
68. Nilsson C, Bergren K (2000). Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. Bio- Science 50: 783-792. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0783:AORECB]2.0.CO;2
69. Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM (2010). The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biological Reviews 85: 837-858.
70. Paal J, Rannik R, Jeletsky EM, Prieditis N (2007). Floodplain forests in Estonia: typological diversity and growth conditions. Folia Geobotanica 42: 383-400. doi: 10.1007/BF02861701
71. Pajares JA, García S, Díez JJ, Martín D, García- Vallejo MC (2004). Feeding responses by Scolytus scolytus to twig bark extracts from elms. Investigaciones Agrarias: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 217-225.
72. Paschke D, Abarzua S, Schlichting A, Richter DU, Leinweber P, Briese V (2009). Inhibitory effects of bark extracts from Ulmus laevis on endometrial carcinoma: an in-vitro study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 18(2): 162-168. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32831bc546.
73. Pastor P (1853). Diagnóstico agrícola sobre la provincia de Asturias [Agricultural diagnostic of Asturias province]. Memoria de la Real Academia de Ciencias de Madrid, Tomo 1, Parte 3. Madrid, Spain, pp. 38. [in Spanish]
74. Perea R, Venturas M, Gil L (2013). Empty seeds are not always bad: Simultaneous effect of seed emptiness and masting on animal seed predation. Plos One 8 (6): e65573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065573
75. Petit RJ, Csaikl UM, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, van Dam B, Deans JD, Dumolin- Lapègue S, Fineschi S, Finkeldey R, Gillies A, Glaz I, Goicoechea PG, Jensen JS, König AO, Lowe AJ, Madsen SF, Mátyás G, Munro RC, Olalde M, Pemonge MH, Popescu F, Slade D, Tabbener H, Taurchini D, de Vries SG, Ziegenhagen B, Kremer A (2002). Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks. Forest Ecology and Management 156 (1-3): 5-26. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00645-4
76. Pezeshki SR (2001). Wetland plant response to soil flooding. Environmental and Experimental Botany 46: 299-312. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00107-1
77. Pinon J, Husson C, Collin E (2005). Susceptibility of native French elm clones to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Annals of Forest Science 62: 689-696. doi: 10.1051/forest:2005066
78. Richens RH, Jeffers JR (1986). Numerical taxonomy and ethnobotany of elms of Northern Spain. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 42: 325-341.
79. Ruíz de la Torre J (1971). Árboles y arbustos de la España peninsular [Trees and shrubs of peninsular Spain] (1st edn). ETSI de Montes, Madrid, Spain, pp. 512. [in Spanish]
80. Schweingruber FH (1990). Anatomy of European woods: an atlas for the identification of European trees, shrubs and dwarf shrubs. Paul Haupt Berne and Stuttgart Publishers, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 726-727.
81. Segura A (1973). De la flora Soriana y circumsoriana [On the flora of Soria and its surroundings]. Pirineos 109: 35-49. [in Spanish]
82. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Burón M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Vanden Broeck A (2005). Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51: 134-141.
83. Somot S, Sevault F, Déqué M, Crépon M (2008). 21st century climate change scenario for the Mediterranean using a coupled Atmosphere- Ocean Regional Climate Model. Global and Planetary Change 63: 112-126. doi: 10.1016/j.-gloplacha.2007.10.003
84. Sperry JS, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA (2008). Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: Scaling from tissues to trees. Plant, Cell and Environment 31: 632-645. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01765.x
85. Srámek M, Cermák J (2012). The vertical leaf distribution of Ulmus laevis Pall. Trees – Structure and Function 26: 1781-1792. doi: 10.1007/s00468-012-0747-y
86. Stafford PJ (1995). The northwest European pollen flora. Ulmaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 88: 25-46. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(95)98770-8
87. Stašiov S, Stašiová A, Svitok M, Michalková E, Slobodník B, Lukáčik I (2012). Millipede (Diplopoda) communities in an arboretum: influence of tree species and soil properties. Biologia 67: 945-952. doi: 10.2478/s11756-012-0097-7
88. Stone GN, Sunnucks P (1993). Genetic consequences of an invasion through a patchy environment - the cynipid gallwasp Andricus kollari. Molecular Ecology 16: 2768-2781. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03348.x
89. Svenning JC, Normand S, Kageyama M (2008). Glacial refugia of temperate trees in Europe: insights from species distribution modelling. Journal of Ecology 96: 1117-1127. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01422.x
90. Thomas FM, Brandt T, Hartmann G (1998). Leaf chlorosis in pedunculate oaks (Quercus robur L) on calcareous soils resulting from lime-induced manganese iron-deficiency: Soil conditions and physiological reactions. Angewandte Botanik 72: 28-36.
91. Timbal J, Collin E (1999). L’orme lisse (Ulmus laevis Pallas) dans le Sud de la France: repartition et stratégie de conservation des resources génétiques [European white elm in southern France: distribution and conservation strategy of its genetic resources]. Revue Forestière Française 51: 593-604. [in French] - doi: 10.4267/2042/5468
92. Tyler G (1992). Inability to solubilize phosphate in limestone soils - key factor controlling calcifuges habit of plants. Plant and Soil 145: 65-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00009542
93. Vakkari P, Rusanen M, Karkkainen K (2009). High genetic differentiation in marginal populations of European white elm (Ulmus laevis). Silva Fennica 43: 185-196. doi: 10.14214/sf.205
94. Valbuena-Carabaña M, López-de-Heredia U, Fuentes- Utrilla P, González-Doncel I, Gil L (2010). Historical and recent changes in Spanish forests: a socioeconomic process. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 162: 492-506. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.003
95. Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Vanden Broeck A, Van Slycken J (2005). A survey of Ulmus laevis in Flanders (Northern Belgium). Belgian Journal of Botany 138: 199-204.
96. Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2004). Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.12.004
97. Venturas M (2013). Estudio de la ecología de Ulmus laevis Pallas en la Península Ibérica [Study of the ecology of Ulmus laevis Pallas in the Iberian Peninsula]. PhD Thesis, Departamento de Silvopascicultura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, pp. 105. [in Spanish]
98. Venturas M, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Ennos R, Collada C, Gil L (2013a). Human induced changes on fine-scale genetic structure in Ulmus laevis Pallas wetland forests at its SW distribution limit. Plant Ecology 214: 317-327. doi: 10.1007/s11258-013-0170-5
99. Venturas M, López R, Gascó A, Gil L (2013b). Hydraulic properties of European elms: xylem safety-efficiency tradeoff and species distribution in the Iberian Peninsula. Trees – Structure and Function 27: 1691-1701. doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0916-7
100. Venturas M, Nanos N, Gil L (2014a). The reproductive ecology of Ulmus laevis Pallas in a transformed habitat. Forest Ecology and Management 312: 170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10. 007
101. Venturas M, Fernandez V, Nadal P, Lucena JJ, Guzman P, Gil L (2014a). Root iron uptake efficiency of Ulmus laevis and U. minor and their distribution in soils of the Iberian Peninsula. Frontiers in Plant Science 5: 104. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00104
102. Webber JF, Kirby JN (1983). Host feeding preference of Scolytus scolytus. In: “Research on Dutch elm disease in Europe” (Burdekin DA ed). Forestry Commission Bulletin 60, HMSO, London, UK, pp. 47-49.
103. Webber JF (2004). Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. Investigaciones Agrarias: Sistemas y Recursos Forstales 13: 197-205.
104. Whiteley RE (2004). Quantitative and molecular genetic variation in Ulmus laevis Pall. PhD Thesis, Department of Plant Biology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 33.
105. Whiteley RE, Black-Samuelsson S, Clapham D (2003a). Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplification within the genus Ulmus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 598-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00525.x
106. Whiteley RE, Black-Samuelsson S, Jansson G (2003b). Within and between population variation in adaptive traits in Ulmus laevis, the European white elm. Forest Genetics 10: 309-319.
107. Wiegrefe S, Sytsma KJ, Guries RP (1994). Phylogeny of elms (Ulmus, Ulmaceae): molecular evidence for a sectional classification. Systematic Botany 19: 590-612. doi: 10.2307/2419779
108. Willkomm M, Lange J (1861). Prodromus Florae Hispanicae. Vol. I, Stuttgartiae, Germany, pp. 248-249.
109. Zohlen A, Tyler G (1997). Differences in iron nutrition strategies of two calcifuges, Carex pilulifera L. and Veronica officinalis L. Annals of Botany 80: 553-559. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0493
110. Zohlen A, Tyler G (2000). Immobilization of tissue iron on calcareous soil: differences between calcicole and calcifuge plants. Oikos 89: 95-106. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890110.x
111. Zohlen A, Tyler G (2004). Soluble inorganic tissue phosphorus and calcicole-calcifuge behaviour of plants. Annals of Botany 94: 427-432. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch162
112. Zohlen A (2002). Chlorosis in wild plants: is it a sing of iron deficiency? Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 2205-2228. doi: 10.1081/PLN-1200 14071