Within and between population variation in adaptive traits in Ulmus laevis, the European white elm

Forest Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 309-319

  Whiteley, Rachel E ^a   Black Samuelsson, Sanna ^a   Jansson, Gunnar ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conservation; Field trial; Genetic variation; Growth; Quantitative genetics; Ulmus laevis

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; ULMUS; ULMUS LAEVIS;

EID: 4143110295     PISSN: 1335048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSON, J. V., CHAO, W. S. & HORVATH, D. P. 2001: A current review on the regulation of dormancy in vegetative buds. Weed Sci. 49: 581-589.
2. BALIUCKAS, V., LAGERSTRÖM, T. & ERIKSSON, G. 2000: Within-population variation in juvenile growth rhythm and growth in Fraxinus excelsior L. and Prunus avium L. For. Genet. 7(3): 183-192.
3. BALIUCKAS, V. 2002: Life history traits and broadleaved tree genetics. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. Silvestria 258, 35+69 pp.
4. CHEN, T. H. H., HOWE, G. T. & BRADSHAW JR., H. D. 2002: Molecular genetic analysis of dormancy-related traits in poplars. Weed Sci. 50: 232-240.
5. COLLIN, E., BILGER, I., ERIKSSON, G. & TUROK, J. 2000: The conservation of elm genetic resources in Europe. In: The elms - breeding, conservation and disease management (ed. C.P. DUNN). pp 281-293. J. Chapman and Hall, New York.
6. CORNELIUS, J. 1994: Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 372-379.
7. EKBERG, I., ERIKSSON, G., NAMKOONG, G., NILSSON, C. & NORELL, L. 1994: Genetic correlations for growth rhythm and growth capacity at ages 3-8 years in provenance hybrids of Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 25-33.
8. ERICSSON, T. & DANELL, Ö. 1995: Genetic evaluation, multiple-trait selection criteria and genetic thinning of Pinus contorta var. latifolia seed orchards in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 10: 313-325.
9. ERIKSSON, G. 2001: Conservation of noble hardwods in Europe. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 577-587.
10. ERIKSSON, G. & EKBERG, I. 2001: An introduction to Forest Genetics. SLU Repro, Uppsala, 166pp.
11. FREWEN, B. E., CHEN, T. H. H., HOWE, G. T., DAVIS, J., ROHDE, A., BOERJAN, W. & BRADSHAW, H. D. 2000: Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of bud set and bud flush in Populus. Genetics. 154(2): 837 -845.
12. GÄRDENPORS, U. 2000: Rödlistade after i Sverige 2000 - The 2000 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
13. GEHLE, T. & KRABEL, D. 2002: Genetic differentiation of elm (Ulmus minor Mill., Ulmus laevis Pallas) in mixed stands from the Elbe flood plains. For. Genet. 9(1): 39-46.
14. GIANOLA, D. & NORTON, H. W. 1981: Scaling threshold characters. Genetics 99: 357-364.
15. GILMOUR, A. R., CULLIS, B. R., WELHAM, S. J. & THOMPSON R. 1995: Average information REML, an efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics 51: 1440-1450.
16. GILMOUR, A. R., CULLIS, B. R., WELHAM, S. J. & THOMPSON R. 2001: ASReml. Program User Manual. Orange Agricultural Institute, New South Wales, Australia. pp 236.
17. HOULE, D. 1992: Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
18. LANDE, R. & SHANNON, S. 1996: The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in the environment. Evolution 50(1): 434-437.
19. LYNCH, M. 1996: A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In: Conservation genetics: Case histories from nature (ed. Avise & J. Hamrick). pp 471-501. J. Chapman and Hall, New York.
20. MACHON, N., LEFRANC, M., BILGER, I., MAZER, S. J. & SARR, A. 1997: Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation. Heredity 78: 12-20.
21. MATTILA, A. & VAKKARI, P. 1997: Genetic variation of Quercus robur and Ulmus laevis in Finland. In: Forest studies 28 - Proceedings of the Meeting of the Nordic Group for Tree Breeding, Estonia June 3-7 1996. pp. 63-68.
22. MITTEMPERGHER, L. & LA PORTA, N. 1991: Hybridization studies in the Eurasian species of elm (Ulmus spp.). Silvae Genet. 40: 237-243.
23. MOUSSEAU, T. A. & ROFF, D. A. 1987: Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181 -197.
24. SACCHETTI, P., TIBERI, R. & MITTEMPERGHER, L. 1990: Preferenza di Scolytus multistratus (Marsham) durante la fase di maturazione delle gonadi nei confronti di due specie di olmo. Redia 73: 347-354.
25. SAS Institute Inc. 2001: SAS/STAT software. Release 8.02. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
26. SPITZE, K. 1993: Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: Quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135: 367-374.
27. STORFER, A. 1996: Quantitative genetics: A promising approach for the assessment of genetic variation in endangered species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11(8): 343-348.
28. SOULÉ, M. E. & Mills, L. S. 1998: Population genetics: no need to isolate genetics. Science 282: 1658-1659.
29. WEBBER, J. 2000: Insect vector behavior and the evolution of Dutch elm disease. In: The elms - breeding, conservation and disease management (ed. C.P. DUNN). pp 47-60. J. Chapman and Hall, New York.
30. WHITELEY, R. E., BLACK-SAMUELSSON, S. & CLAPHAM, D. 2003: Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplification within the genus Ulmus. Mol. Ecol. Not. 3(4): 598-600.
31. WRIGHT, S. 1951: The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15: 323-354.