Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: Analysis of differentiation

Heredity

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 12-20

  Machon, Nathalie ^a   Lefranc, Madeleine ^a   Bilger, Isabelle ^b   Mazer, Susan J ^a,c   Sarr, Aboubakry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

French elms; genetic diversity; geographical differentiation; hybrids; isozymes; Ulmus

Indexed keywords

ULMACEAE; ULMUS; ULMUS GLABRA; ULMUS LAEVIS; ULMUS MINOR;

EID: 0031024387     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1997.2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BROWN, A. H. D. 1978. Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation. Theor. Appl. Genet., 52, 145-157.
2. ERIKSSON, G., NAMKOONG, G. AND ROBERDS, J. H. 1993. Dynamic gene conservation for uncertain futures. Forest Ecol. Management, 62, 15-37.
3. HAMRICK, J. L., GODT, M. J. W. AND SHERMAN-BROYLES, S. L. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests, 6, 95-124.
4. KREMER, A. 1994. Diversité génétique et variabilité des caractères phénotypiques chez les arbres forestiers. Génet. Sél. Évol, 26, suppl. 1, 105-123.
5. LEWONTIN, R. C. 1984. Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Am. Nat., 123, 115-124.
6. MACHON, N., LEFRANC, M., BILGER, I. AND HENRI, J.-P. 1995. Isoenzymes as an aid to clarify the taxonomy of French elms. Heredity, 74, 39-47.
7. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106, 282-292.
8. NEI, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 3321-3323.
9. NEI, M., MARUYAMA, T. AND CHAKRABORTY, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1-10.
10. PEARCE, N. J. AND RICHENS, R. H. 1977. Peroxidase isozymes in some elms (Ulmus L.) of eastern England. Watsonia, 11, 382-383.
11. RICHENS, R. H. 1968. The correct designation of the European field elm. Feddes Repertorium, 79, 1-2.
12. RICHENS, R. H. AND PEARCE, N. J. 1984. Isoperoxidases variation in Ulmus L. Forestry, 57, 75-84.
13. SCHOEN, D. J. AND BROWN, A. H. D. 1993. Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90, 10623-10627.
14. SHAW, C. R. AND PRASAD, R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes. A compilation of recipes. Biochem. Genet., 4, 297-320.
15. SOLTIS, D. E. AND SOLTIS, P. S. 1990. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Chapman & Hall, London.
16. SWOFFORD, D. AND SELANDER, R. 1989. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered., 72, 281-283.
17. WRIGHT, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19, 395-420.