The RNA structurome: Transcriptome-wide structure probing with next-generation sequencing

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 221-232

  Kwok, Chun Kit ^a,b   Tang, Yin ^a,b   Assmann, Sarah M ^a,b   Bevilacqua, Philip C ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Next generation sequencing (NGS); RNA structure; RNA structurome; Structure prediction; Structure probing; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA; TRANSFER RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; REGULATORY RNA SEQUENCE; REVIEW; RIBOSWITCH; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA PROBE; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSLATION REGULATION; CONFORMATION; GENETICS; PROCEDURES;

ARABIDOPSIS;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84925301356     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: 13624326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Sharp P.A. The centrality of RNA. Cell 2009, 136:577-580.
2. Wan Y., et al. Understanding the transcriptome through RNA structure. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:641-655.
3. Mortimer S.A., et al. Insights into RNA structure and function from genome-wide studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15:469-479.
4. Kwok C.K., et al. Determination of in vivo RNA structure in low-abundance transcripts. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2971.
5. Tyrrell J., et al. The cellular environment stabilizes adenine riboswitch RNA structure. Biochemistry 2013, 52:8777-8785.
6. McGinnis J.L., Weeks K.M. Ribosome RNA assembly intermediates visualized in living cells. Biochemistry 2014, 53:3237-3247.
7. Blount K.F., Uhlenbeck O.C. The structure-function dilemma of the hammerhead ribozyme. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2005, 34:415-440.
8. Yajima R., et al. A conformationally restricted guanosine analog reveals the catalytic relevance of three structures of an RNA enzyme. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14:23-30.
9. Serganov A., Patel D.J. Ribozymes, riboswitches and beyond: regulation of gene expression without proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:776-790.
10. Gutell R.R. Comparative studies of RNA: inferring higher-order structure from patterns of sequence variation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1993, 3:313-322.
11. Gutell R.R., et al. Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58:10-26.
12. Cannone J., et al. The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinform. 2002, 3:2.
13. Gutell R.R., et al. The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12:301-310.
14. Reuter J., Mathews D. RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:129.
15. Turner D.H., Mathews D.H. NNDB: the nearest neighbor parameter database for predicting stability of nucleic acid secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D280-D282.
16. Freier S.M., et al. Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83:9373-9377.
17. Jaeger J.A., et al. Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86:7706-7710.
18. Mathews D.H., et al. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 288:911-940.
19. Mathews D.H. Using an RNA secondary structure partition function to determine confidence in base pairs predicted by free energy minimization. RNA 2004, 10:1178-1190.
20. Mathews D.H., et al. Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:7287-7292.
21. Xu Z., Mathews D.H. Multilign: an algorithm to predict secondary structures conserved in multiple RNA sequences. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:626-632.
22. Harmanci A., et al. TurboFold: Iterative probabilistic estimation of secondary structures for multiple RNA sequences. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:108.
23. Zuker M., Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9:133-148.
24. Ehresmann C., et al. Probing the structure of RNAs in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15:9109-9128.
25. Weeks K.M. Advances in RNA structure analysis by chemical probing. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20:295-304.
26. Aultman K.S., Chang S.H. Partial P1 nuclease digestion as a probe of tRNA structure. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982, 124:471-476.
27. Guerrier-Takada C., Altman S. Structure in solution of M1 RNA, the catalytic subunit of ribonuclease P from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1984, 23:6327-6334.
28. Woese C.R., et al. Secondary structure model for bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA: phylogenetic, enzymatic and chemical evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8:2275-2293.
29. Wells S.E., et al. Use of dimethyl sulfate to probe RNA structure in vivo. Method Enzymol. 2000, 318:479-493.
30. Wilkinson K.A., et al. Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE): quantitative RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:1610-1616.
31. Zaug A.J., Cech T.R. Analysis of the structure of Tetrahymena nuclear RNAs in vivo: telomerase RNA, the self-splicing rRNA intron, and U2 snRNA. RNA 1995, 1:363-374.
32. Spitale R.C., et al. RNA SHAPE analysis in living cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9:18-20.
33. Deigan K.E., et al. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA structure determination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:97-102.
34. Cordero P., et al. Quantitative dimethyl sulfate mapping for automated RNA secondary structure inference. Biochemistry 2012, 51:7037-7039.
35. Hajdin C.E., et al. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling, including pseudoknots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5498-5503.
36. Zarringhalam K., et al. Integrating chemical footprinting data into RNA secondary structure prediction. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e45160.
37. Quarrier S., et al. Evaluation of the information content of RNA structure mapping data for secondary structure prediction. RNA 2010, 16:1108-1117.
38. Washietl S., et al. RNA folding with soft constraints: reconciliation of probing data and thermodynamic secondary structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:4261-4272.
39. Eddy S.R. Computational analysis of conserved RNA secondary structure in transcriptomes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014, 43:433-456.
40. Vasa S.M., et al. ShapeFinder: a software system for high-throughput quantitative analysis of nucleic acid reactivity information resolved by capillary electrophoresis. RNA 2008, 14:1979-1990.
41. Westhof E., Romby P. The RNA structurome: high-throughput probing. Nat. Meth. 2010, 7:965-967.
42. Kertesz M., et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 2010, 467:103-107.
43. Underwood J.G., et al. FragSeq: transcriptome-wide RNA structure probing using high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Meth. 2010, 7:995-1001.
44. Zheng Q., et al. Genome-wide double-stranded RNA sequencing reveals the functional significance of base-paired RNAs in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001141.
45. Li F., et al. Global analysis of RNA secondary structure in two metazoans. Cell Rep. 2012, 1:69-82.
46. Li F., et al. Regulatory impact of RNA secondary structure across the Arabidopsis transcriptome. Plant Cell 2012, 24:4346-4359.
47. Wan Y., et al. Genome-wide mapping of RNA structure using nuclease digestion and high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8:849-869.
48. Wan Y., et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA folding energies. Mol. Cell 2012, 48:169-181.
49. Lucks J.B., et al. Multiplexed RNA structure characterization with selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:11063-11068.
50. Aviran S., et al. Modeling and automation of sequencing-based characterization of RNA structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:11069-11074.
51. Loughrey D., et al. SHAPE-Seq 2.0: systematic optimization and extension of high-throughput chemical probing of RNA secondary structure with next generation sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:e165.
52. Seetin M.G., et al. Massively parallel RNA chemical mapping with a reduced bias MAP-seq protocol. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1086:95-117.
53. Kielpinski L.J., Vinther J. Massive parallel-sequencing-based hydroxyl radical probing of RNA accessibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:e70.
54. Hector R.D., et al. Snapshots of pre-rRNA structural flexibility reveal eukaryotic 40S assembly dynamics at nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:12138-12154.
55. Incarnato D., et al. Genome-wide profiling of mouse RNA secondary structures reveals key features of the mammalian transcriptome. Genome Biol. 2014, 15:491.
56. Wan Y., et al. Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome. Nature 2014, 505:706-709.
57. Siegfried N.A., et al. RNA motif discovery by SHAPE and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP). Nat. Meth. 2014, 11:959-965.
58. Homan P.J., et al. Single-molecule correlated chemical probing of RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:13858-13863.
59. Ding Y., et al. In vivo genome-wide profiling of RNA secondary structure reveals novel regulatory features. Nature 2014, 505:696-700.
60. Rouskin S., et al. Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature 2014, 505:701-705.
61. Talkish J., et al. Mod-seq: high-throughput sequencing for chemical probing of RNA structure. RNA 2014, 20:713-720.
62. Walker G.C., et al. T4-induced RNA ligase joins single-stranded oligoribonucleotides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72:122-126.
63. England T.E., Uhlenbeck O.C. Enzymic oligoribonucleotide synthesis with T4 RNA ligase. Biochemistry 1978, 17:2069-2076.
64. Jayaprakash A.D., et al. Identification and remediation of biases in the activity of RNA ligases in small-RNA deep sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:e141.
65. Ingolia N.T., et al. The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7:1534-1550.
66. Gansauge M.T., Meyer M. Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8:737-748.
67. Kwok C.K., et al. A hybridization-based approach for quantitative and low-bias single-stranded DNA ligation. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 435:181-186.
68. Low J.T., Weeks K.M. SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure prediction. Methods 2010, 52:150-158.
69. Aviran S., Pachter L. Rational experiment design for sequencing-based RNA structure mapping. RNA 2014, 20:1864-1877.
70. Shabalina S.A., et al. A periodic pattern of mRNA secondary structure created by the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:2428-2437.
71. Jennings M.L., Cui J. Chloride homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: high affinity influx, V-ATPase-dependent sequestration, and identification of a candidate Cl- sensor. J. Gen. Physiol. 2008, 131:379-391.
72. Harris K.A., et al. In-vivo structural-analysis of spliced leader RNAs in Trypanosoma brucei and Leptomonas collosoma: a flexible structure that is independent of Cap4 methylations. RNA 1995, 1:351-362.
73. Adilakshmi T., et al. Structural analysis of RNA in living cells by in vivo synchrotron X-ray footprinting. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 468:239-258.
74. Steen K.A., et al. Fingerprinting noncanonical and tertiary RNA structures by differential SHAPE reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:13160-13163.
75. Rice G.M., et al. RNA secondary structure modeling at consistent high accuracy using differential SHAPE. RNA 2014, 20:846-854.
76. Lorenz R., et al. RNA folding algorithms with G-Quadruplexes. Adv. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2012, 7409:49-60.
77. Huppertz I., et al. iCLIP: Protein-RNA interactions at nucleotide resolution. Methods 2014, 65:274-287.
78. Helwak A., et al. Mapping the human miRNA interactome by CLASH reveals frequent noncanonical binding. Cell 2013, 153:654-665.
79. Quinn J.J., et al. Revealing long noncoding RNA architecture and functions using domain-specific chromatin isolation by RNA purification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:933-940.
80. Engreitz J.M., et al. RNA-RNA interactions enable specific targeting of noncoding RNAs to nascent Pre-mRNAs and chromatin sites. Cell 2014, 159:188-199.
81. Li F., et al. SAVoR: a server for sequencing annotation and visualization of RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:W59-W64.
82. Ouyang Z., et al. SeqFold: genome-scale reconstruction of RNA secondary structure integrating high-throughput sequencing data. Genome Res. 2013, 23:377-387.
83. Leontis N.B., et al. The RNA Ontology Consortium: an open invitation to the RNA community. RNA 2006, 12:533-541.